Alex Jones Trial

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
5,814
Watching anything featuring Alex Jones is the same as jumping into the back of a clowns putt putt car at the circus.

Sure, the ride will be lots of fun but you just end up with lots of people laughing at you....

....and that's it.
 

Lurking009

Star
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
1,691
I watched a video once about how all the homes in the Sandy Hook area were bought off, mortgages all paid in full. It was a researcher who made public a spreadsheet listing all the addresses and amounts paid off.

The video was up about two days before being removed.

If you add up all the weight of the "circumstantial" evidence that this was a staged event it kinda crushes the official narrative into dust.

From experience I've learned to never believe the official narrative. Fool me once shame on you....fool me twice....
I'm not disagreeing about the shadiness and I completely understand why people have doubts surrounding this incident, but there may be another side and explanation to this story that no one is taking into account. Who paid the mortgages? Are there public records of this that anyone can look at?

The families received a combined settlement of $33 million from the Remington Company alone. There may have been more settlements which would account for the sudden financial gains of the families and could have contributed to mortgage payments. All sides must be looked at rather than just the ones that fit a theory.
 
Last edited:

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
5,814
I'm not disagreeing about the shadiness and I completely understand why people have doubts surrounding this incident, but there may be another side to this story and explanation that no one is taking into account.
I personally feel there are only two sided here not three. Either it happened exactly as the msn reported it or it was a staged event to forward political agendas and to perpetuate the social engineering programme that we have all been subjected to all our lives.

You simply cannot afford to believe anything that is reported by the msn. Just look around you, look what they've done to people, walking around with silly masks on. Their heads are owned.

No need to go over the details of Sandy Hook. The media lie, once people fully understand this, the game changes
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
14,305
Not saying that you are wrong but how does AJ benefit from so called clown show?
Agent Jones is an actor playing his part in a massive psy-op. His character Alex Jones doesn't benefit, but his actions serve two purposes. One, to resurrect the Sandy Hook gun grab agenda (what timing!) and Two, to stifle free speech and scare journalists or any AJ types and/or truthers from speaking out.
 

Lurking009

Star
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
1,691
I personally feel there are only two sided here not three. Either it happened exactly as the msn reported it or it was a staged event to forward political agendas and to perpetuate the social engineering programme that we have all been subjected to all our lives.

You simply cannot afford to believe anything that is reported by the msn. Just look around you, look what they've done to people, walking around with silly masks on. Their heads are owned.

No need to go over the details of Sandy Hook. The media lie, once people fully understand this, the game changes

You said mortgages were paid off, and that was part of the circumstantial evidence. I'm asking who paid the mortgages off and if there is a public record of it. A video doesn't do any good if it can't be corroborated via public records.

I don't buy into this line of reasoning: "MSM lies therefore the opposite of what they say is always true.". That's an unreasoned reaction rather than a logical argument.
 
Last edited:

Lurking009

Star
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
1,691
Agent Jones is an actor playing his part in a massive psy-op. His character Alex Jones doesn't benefit, but his actions serve two purposes. One, to resurrect the Sandy Hook gun grab agenda (what timing!) and Two, to stifle free speech and scare journalists or any AJ types and/or truthers from speaking out.
Regarding Jones: That's definitely food for thought. I had heard this explanation a long time ago from somewhere else but forgot about it, and it's something to consider.

Edit to add: I must say, though, that he looked authentically shocked and caught off guard [complete with sweating red face] when the prosecutor told him his own lawyers leaked his entire phone data to the SH hook lawyers. I don't think he's that good of an actor to fake such a thing.

Regarding the gun grab and free speech: Yes, there should be no doubt in anyone's mind by now about how this works. Whether people believe mass shootings are real or a hoax, the end goal is always the same. Never let a crisis go to waste.
 

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
5,814
I don't buy into this line of reasoning: "MSM lies therefore the opposite of what they say is always true.". That's a reaction rather than a logical argument.

And I don't buy into the reasoning that sometimes the msn just make shit up to brainwash us and other times they are trying to give you valuable information to enhance your life.

They are doing one or the other, and I've seem enough of their bullshit to inform me of their overall objectives.

Your reasoning is like saying it's fine to put your head in the crocodiles mouth because he doesn't bite people's heads off ALL the time.

I just don't understand that at all.
 

Lurking009

Star
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
1,691
And I don't buy into the reasoning that sometimes the msn just make shit up to brainwash us and other times they are trying to give you valuable information to enhance your life.

They are doing one or the other, and I've seem enough of their bullshit to inform me of their overall objectives.

Your reasoning is like saying it's fine to put your head in the crocodiles mouth because he doesn't bite people's heads off ALL the time.

I just don't understand that at all.

So, do you have any valid information on the mortgages or not? If this was part of why you firmly believe it was a hoax, that would be key information.
 

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
5,814
So, do you have any valid information on the mortgages or not? If this was part of why you firmly believe it was a hoax, that would be key information.
No obviously not, as I said that info lasted about two days.

The Truth disappears pretty quickly nowadays you know.

The money was paid before the event not after so it had nothing to do with any legitimate fund raising.
 

Lurking009

Star
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
1,691
No obviously not, as I said that info lasted about two days.

The Truth disappears pretty quickly nowadays you know.

If you weren't able to corroborate the information yourself [such as through public records], how do you know it was true? If it was true, it still comes back to the question of who paid the mortgages off. Kind of a big deal if you're willing to accuse parents of faking their own children's murders.
 

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
5,814
If you weren't able to corroborate the information yourself [such as through public records], how do you know it was true?
Public records are currently claiming a bunch of Muslims did 9/11.

I'll pass on the public record thing if that's OK with you?
 

Lurking009

Star
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
1,691
Public records are currently claiming a bunch of Muslims did 9/11.

I'll pass on the public record thing if that's OK with you?
Wow. I'm not here to change your mind about SH. I'm also not here to take your word for it. I'm simply challenging your own claims of 'evidence'. Without actual evidence, accusations are nothing more than slander and opinion.
 

Awoken2

Superstar
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
5,814
The families received a combined settlement of $33 million from the Remington Company alone. There may have been more settlements which would account for the sudden financial gains of the families and could have contributed to mortgage payments. All sides must be looked at rather than just the ones that fit a theory.
Familiar figures aren't they? 33 66....just happen to be there coincidentally.

July 27 (Reuters) - Remington Arms Co on Tuesday offered to pay nearly $33 million to nine families to settle lawsuits claiming that its marketing of firearms contributed to the 2012 Sandy Hook school massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, where 26 people died.

The proposed settlements would provide $3.66 million to relatives of each victim, subject to approval by the federal judge overseeing Remington's bankruptcy case in Alabama.

How do you verify this as actual truth, right back at ya?
 

Lurking009

Star
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
1,691
Familiar figures aren't they? 33 66....just happen to be there coincidentally.

July 27 (Reuters) - Remington Arms Co on Tuesday offered to pay nearly $33 million to nine families to settle lawsuits claiming that its marketing of firearms contributed to the 2012 Sandy Hook school massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, where 26 people died.

The proposed settlements would provide $3.66 million to relatives of each victim, subject to approval by the federal judge overseeing Remington's bankruptcy case in Alabama.

How do you verify this as actual truth, right back at ya?

The difference is one person's video about mortgages which cannot be corroborated [including who allegedly paid them off] vs. a very well-known lawsuit that has been widely covered, ruled on by the Supreme Court, and reported by numerous sources. You would have to prove all of this - including the Supreme Court - does not exist:













 
Last edited:
Top