Abortion : The Otherside of the slippery slope

saki

Veteran
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Messages
545
Likes
971
https://newstarget.com/2019-11-03-nazi-extermination-gas-abortion-pills-pharmaceutical-company.html

Extermination gas used by Nazis during Holocaust developed by same pharmaceutical company that invented abortion pills
11/03/2019 / By Ethan Huff


A popular “abortion pill” that terminates unborn human life during the first nine or 10 weeks of pregnancy just so happens to have been created by the very same folks that invented the extermination gas used in Nazi death camps during World War II, a new video produced by the pro-life group Live Action has revealed.

As it turns out, Roussel-Uclaf, a French pharmaceutical company that’s credited with first coming up with the RU-486 abortion pill back in 1980, is actually a subsidiary of Hoechst AG, a German pharmaceutical company that developed some of the poisonous gas compounds that were used by the Nazis to kill Jews and other “undesirables” in death camps during the Holocaust.

This shocking revelation gives a whole new meaning to the popular Antifa chant, Go home, Nazis!, as it proves that the real Nazis in our society are the legal drug cartels that dispense life-destroying pharmaceuticals as “medicine” – and all with the blessing of the corrupt U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The roughly four-minute video by Live Action explains how nearly 350,000 unborn babies were killed by the RU-486 abortion pill just in the year 2017. This represents nearly 40 percent of all abortions that were reported that year, the video goes on to explain.

You can watch the Live Action video about the RU-486 abortion pill on YouTube, as well as below:

Back in 1964, the Walt Disney Company produced a pro-abortion film for The Population Council, a eugenicist group that was given patent rights for RU-486 in 1994

In case you’re unfamiliar with it, RU-486 contains a drug known as mifepristone that kills unborn babies by starving them of nutrients. And while Roussel-Uclaf had initially refused to sell it in the United States, none other than former President Bill Clinton signed an executive order back in 1993 to expedite the drug’s import into America.

Just one year later in 1994, Roussel-Uclaf donated the patent rights for RU-486 to The Population Council, Inc., a not-for-profit corporation founded by eugenicists who want to control the populations of the world by killing off as many unborn children as possible.

Believe it or not, Walt Disney Productions actually partnered up with The Population Council back in 1964 to produce a “Family Planning” propaganda film that pushed the message that there are too many people in the world, and that something needs to be done to curb population numbers.

“Today, deaths are cut in half or better, especially among children. The old balance is upset. Those who live now instead of die are added each year to the number of people in the community,” the narrator of this 1964 Disney production states.

“The mother will have too much to do. She’ll be tired and cross, and her health will suffer. The children will be sickly and unhappy, with little hope for the future. This picture can be true for countless families if the number of children born is left to chance,” he goes on to explain, adding that family planning is a way of overcoming this, “merely by taking pills or using simple devices.”

Just one year after The Population Council was given the patent rights to RU-486, it set up a pharmaceutical company known as DANCO Laboratories that quickly rushed abortion pills onto the market. DANCO was originally chartered offshore in the Grand Cayman Islands, which is a well-known tax haven.

RU-486, or mifepristone, was also brought over to China not long after, where it continues to be the abortion drug of choice for families to abide by China’s one-child policy.

Be sure to watch the full Live Action video for the rest of the story on YouTube.
 





Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
95
Likes
165
Pro abortionists tend to use "r*pe" as a way to justify the murder of babies. By this i mean they always say "what if" The person was raped. ?? That simply does not win the argument. not only that pregnancy is a potential outcome of r*pe it's not something that happens a lot from it. Obviously if i were to be in that situation it'd be a lot to take in. (Either have my rapists baby... or abort it... but personally i'd choose the innocent life over my own well being probably give it up for a adoption to someone who could love it because part of me wouldn't ever be able to....)

A girl who's pro abortion wishing r*pe on someone because they don't agree. V

A video of a tiny baby the outcome of an abortion V (warning Graphic)
 





NPC

Established
Joined
Jul 6, 2019
Messages
182
Likes
393
https://newstarget.com/2019-11-03-nazi-extermination-gas-abortion-pills-pharmaceutical-company.html

Extermination gas used by Nazis during Holocaust developed by same pharmaceutical company that invented abortion pills
11/03/2019 / By Ethan Huff


A popular “abortion pill” that terminates unborn human life during the first nine or 10 weeks of pregnancy just so happens to have been created by the very same folks that invented the extermination gas used in Nazi death camps during World War II, a new video produced by the pro-life group Live Action has revealed.

As it turns out, Roussel-Uclaf, a French pharmaceutical company that’s credited with first coming up with the RU-486 abortion pill back in 1980, is actually a subsidiary of Hoechst AG, a German pharmaceutical company that developed some of the poisonous gas compounds that were used by the Nazis to kill Jews and other “undesirables” in death camps during the Holocaust.

This shocking revelation gives a whole new meaning to the popular Antifa chant, Go home, Nazis!, as it proves that the real Nazis in our society are the legal drug cartels that dispense life-destroying pharmaceuticals as “medicine” – and all with the blessing of the corrupt U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The roughly four-minute video by Live Action explains how nearly 350,000 unborn babies were killed by the RU-486 abortion pill just in the year 2017. This represents nearly 40 percent of all abortions that were reported that year, the video goes on to explain.

You can watch the Live Action video about the RU-486 abortion pill on YouTube, as well as below:

Back in 1964, the Walt Disney Company produced a pro-abortion film for The Population Council, a eugenicist group that was given patent rights for RU-486 in 1994

In case you’re unfamiliar with it, RU-486 contains a drug known as mifepristone that kills unborn babies by starving them of nutrients. And while Roussel-Uclaf had initially refused to sell it in the United States, none other than former President Bill Clinton signed an executive order back in 1993 to expedite the drug’s import into America.

Just one year later in 1994, Roussel-Uclaf donated the patent rights for RU-486 to The Population Council, Inc., a not-for-profit corporation founded by eugenicists who want to control the populations of the world by killing off as many unborn children as possible.

Believe it or not, Walt Disney Productions actually partnered up with The Population Council back in 1964 to produce a “Family Planning” propaganda film that pushed the message that there are too many people in the world, and that something needs to be done to curb population numbers.

“Today, deaths are cut in half or better, especially among children. The old balance is upset. Those who live now instead of die are added each year to the number of people in the community,” the narrator of this 1964 Disney production states.

“The mother will have too much to do. She’ll be tired and cross, and her health will suffer. The children will be sickly and unhappy, with little hope for the future. This picture can be true for countless families if the number of children born is left to chance,” he goes on to explain, adding that family planning is a way of overcoming this, “merely by taking pills or using simple devices.”

Just one year after The Population Council was given the patent rights to RU-486, it set up a pharmaceutical company known as DANCO Laboratories that quickly rushed abortion pills onto the market. DANCO was originally chartered offshore in the Grand Cayman Islands, which is a well-known tax haven.

RU-486, or mifepristone, was also brought over to China not long after, where it continues to be the abortion drug of choice for families to abide by China’s one-child policy.

Be sure to watch the full Live Action video for the rest of the story on YouTube.
Here is that Disney film:
 





Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
45
Likes
65
https://newstarget.com/2019-11-03-nazi-extermination-gas-abortion-pills-pharmaceutical-company.html

Extermination gas used by Nazis during Holocaust developed by same pharmaceutical company that invented abortion pills
11/03/2019 / By Ethan Huff


A popular “abortion pill” that terminates unborn human life during the first nine or 10 weeks of pregnancy just so happens to have been created by the very same folks that invented the extermination gas used in Nazi death camps during World War II, a new video produced by the pro-life group Live Action has revealed.

As it turns out, Roussel-Uclaf, a French pharmaceutical company that’s credited with first coming up with the RU-486 abortion pill back in 1980, is actually a subsidiary of Hoechst AG, a German pharmaceutical company that developed some of the poisonous gas compounds that were used by the Nazis to kill Jews and other “undesirables” in death camps during the Holocaust.

This shocking revelation gives a whole new meaning to the popular Antifa chant, Go home, Nazis!, as it proves that the real Nazis in our society are the legal drug cartels that dispense life-destroying pharmaceuticals as “medicine” – and all with the blessing of the corrupt U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The roughly four-minute video by Live Action explains how nearly 350,000 unborn babies were killed by the RU-486 abortion pill just in the year 2017. This represents nearly 40 percent of all abortions that were reported that year, the video goes on to explain.

You can watch the Live Action video about the RU-486 abortion pill on YouTube, as well as below:

Back in 1964, the Walt Disney Company produced a pro-abortion film for The Population Council, a eugenicist group that was given patent rights for RU-486 in 1994

In case you’re unfamiliar with it, RU-486 contains a drug known as mifepristone that kills unborn babies by starving them of nutrients. And while Roussel-Uclaf had initially refused to sell it in the United States, none other than former President Bill Clinton signed an executive order back in 1993 to expedite the drug’s import into America.

Just one year later in 1994, Roussel-Uclaf donated the patent rights for RU-486 to The Population Council, Inc., a not-for-profit corporation founded by eugenicists who want to control the populations of the world by killing off as many unborn children as possible.

Believe it or not, Walt Disney Productions actually partnered up with The Population Council back in 1964 to produce a “Family Planning” propaganda film that pushed the message that there are too many people in the world, and that something needs to be done to curb population numbers.

“Today, deaths are cut in half or better, especially among children. The old balance is upset. Those who live now instead of die are added each year to the number of people in the community,” the narrator of this 1964 Disney production states.

“The mother will have too much to do. She’ll be tired and cross, and her health will suffer. The children will be sickly and unhappy, with little hope for the future. This picture can be true for countless families if the number of children born is left to chance,” he goes on to explain, adding that family planning is a way of overcoming this, “merely by taking pills or using simple devices.”

Just one year after The Population Council was given the patent rights to RU-486, it set up a pharmaceutical company known as DANCO Laboratories that quickly rushed abortion pills onto the market. DANCO was originally chartered offshore in the Grand Cayman Islands, which is a well-known tax haven.

RU-486, or mifepristone, was also brought over to China not long after, where it continues to be the abortion drug of choice for families to abide by China’s one-child policy.

Be sure to watch the full Live Action video for the rest of the story on YouTube.
a lot of things we use today came from Nazi and Japanese concentration and prisoner of war camps, in fact america did a deal with japan, america could get all the medical experimentation medical reports for leniency from the Japanese scientists.
most of what we know, like gangrene, frostbite, germ warfare, plague and pneumonia come from Japanese human experimentation, including living dissections on Australian and American pows, and Chinese prisoners, they also shot. blew people up and drenched them in water to see the effects on the ALIVE people research unit 731. yet america let them get away with it for the information.
regarding Nazi concentration camps, again america, Britain and Russia, all took information from nazi scientists, including but not limited to, nuclear bombs, rocket science, jet engine technology, drugs like LSD, live experimentation on living humans, including draining oxygen from rooms to see what happens to people, leaving them in cold water to see the effects, removing body parts, cutting and inserting debris and soil into the cuts to see how the body reacted, all so they could improve nazi soldiers.
again this information was took by the allies in exchange for lenient sentences, including operation paperclip where nazi scientists where took to america, to help fund and improve america warfare, NASA was built on nazi technology.

so yes abortion pills may have come from a concentration camp but 90% of our pharmaceuticals, knowledge of disease and warfare comes from human experimentation by the enemy that was usurped and used by the allies during and after the war. so you cant just cherry pick one issue and forget the rest, to fit a prolife narrative.

also pills and herbs have been used for abortions long before WW2, as long as women could get pregnent, people have found ways to abort.
 





Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
45
Likes
65
Pro abortionists tend to use "r*pe" as a way to justify the murder of babies. By this i mean they always say "what if" The person was raped. ?? That simply does not win the argument. not only that pregnancy is a potential outcome of r*pe it's not something that happens a lot from it. Obviously if i were to be in that situation it'd be a lot to take in. (Either have my rapists baby... or abort it... but personally i'd choose the innocent life over my own well being probably give it up for a adoption to someone who could love it because part of me wouldn't ever be able to....)

A girl who's pro abortion wishing r*pe on someone because they don't agree. V

A video of a tiny baby the outcome of an abortion V (warning Graphic)
pro choicers use a number of examples as to why women are not incubators and forfeit their humanity once a fertilised egg attaches to her uterine wall or a Fallopian tube
  1. Medical issues - including eptopic pregnancies, extreme morning sickness, diabetes,
  2. risk to mothers life - abortions after a partial miscarriage that is going septic, she needs cancer treatment.
  3. the fetus is not viable - it wont live once born, it will live in extreme pain, it has no brain, it is already dying, extreme disabilities
  4. financial - can not afford the pregnancy, birth, or future child
  5. autonomy - a woman does not forfeit her health, body or life, for someone or something, in the same way you can not be forced to donate organs, body parts or blood, even when dead
  6. simply does not wish to be pregnant - most abortions are from women who took all the precautions, she was married, she used all the contraceptives, she watched her cycle and an accident happened, she does not wish to carry the pregnancy.
  7. already have to many children
  8. poverty
  9. and yes r*pe
 





Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
95
Likes
165
pro choicers use a number of examples as to why women are not incubators and forfeit their humanity once a fertilised egg attaches to her uterine wall or a Fallopian tube
  1. Medical issues - including eptopic pregnancies, extreme morning sickness, diabetes,
  2. risk to mothers life - abortions after a partial miscarriage that is going septic, she needs cancer treatment.
  3. the fetus is not viable - it wont live once born, it will live in extreme pain, it has no brain, it is already dying, extreme disabilities
  4. financial - can not afford the pregnancy, birth, or future child
  5. autonomy - a woman does not forfeit her health, body or life, for someone or something, in the same way you can not be forced to donate organs, body parts or blood, even when dead
  6. simply does not wish to be pregnant - most abortions are from women who took all the precautions, she was married, she used all the contraceptives, she watched her cycle and an accident happened, she does not wish to carry the pregnancy.
  7. already have to many children
  8. poverty
  9. and yes r*pe
If you financially cannot afford to raise a child you have no business getting pregnant that's selfish!!!

Also if you don't want a baby get sterilised or don't open your legs! Simple I will never agree to the murder of an unborn baby especially not for ridiculous reasons.
 





Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
45
Likes
65
Strictly from a woman's health perspective, I'd say that using mugwort and/or motherwort to induce a miscarriage early in a pregnancy is very different than having a fetus ripped from the womb at 18 weeks.
how?
its still a miscarriage by design, after all miscarriage is still abortion. if you use herbs, drugs or medical intervention its still, there to exspell a pregnancy. so how is using a herb different from a medical procedure, if your against abortion, due to the expulsion of a fetus then surely you are against eh use of herbs, how is it different?
 





Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
45
Likes
65
If you financially cannot afford to raise a child you have no business getting pregnant that's selfish!!!

Also if you don't want a baby get sterilised or don't open your legs! Simple I will never agree to the murder of an unborn baby especially not for ridiculous reasons.
you have a very simple view of life, for one where is the responsibility of the man.
how are they ridiculous reasons?
also its not a baby
selfsih surely is bringing a life into the world you cant feed, clothes or care for.
pregnancy is not something often chosen, consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy.
sex is enjoyable, people evolved to want it, its not realistic to expect people to not have sex, take married women they make up a good portion of abortion statistics, meaning a married couple exercised their right to sex, and they got pregnant when they did not want to be, so they had an abortion, also the majority of abortions are before the pregnancy is even at the level of a fetus, it barely even resembles a human, if at all, has no brain or nervous system.

a woman does not owe someone else the use of her body, same as no man owes people the right to his blood or organs, even a corpse does not loose their rights to body autonomy, you cant just take organs and body parts, with out consent from the decreased prior to death.
yet we expect women to forfeit their rights to their body for something that quite frankly will cause her harm, and could kill her, she could end up with life changing and permanent damage to her body including incontinence, hip damage, prolapsed womb, organ failure.
the pregnancy can cause
  1. anaemia
  2. diabetes
  3. depression
  4. high blood pressure
  5. morning sickness, sometimes so severe it can nearly kill her.
  6. placenta previa
  7. placenta abruption
  8. preeclapsia
  9. pelvic pain
  10. deep vein thrombosis
these can kill in some cases, and will cause her permanent issues. so yeah she is selfish but sometimes you have to be, thats not a bad thing. women should not be expected to be martyred for a potential life when she already has one. she does not forfeit her life because an egg became fertilised.
 





Joined
Sep 20, 2017
Messages
95
Likes
165
you have a very simple view of life, for one where is the responsibility of the man.
how are they ridiculous reasons?
also its not a baby
selfsih surely is bringing a life into the world you cant feed, clothes or care for.
pregnancy is not something often chosen, consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy.
sex is enjoyable, people evolved to want it, its not realistic to expect people to not have sex, take married women they make up a good portion of abortion statistics, meaning a married couple exercised their right to sex, and they got pregnant when they did not want to be, so they had an abortion, also the majority of abortions are before the pregnancy is even at the level of a fetus, it barely even resembles a human, if at all, has no brain or nervous system.

a woman does not owe someone else the use of her body, same as no man owes people the right to his blood or organs, even a corpse does not loose their rights to body autonomy, you cant just take organs and body parts, with out consent from the decreased prior to death.
yet we expect women to forfeit their rights to their body for something that quite frankly will cause her harm, and could kill her, she could end up with life changing and permanent damage to her body including incontinence, hip damage, prolapsed womb, organ failure.
the pregnancy can cause
  1. anaemia
  2. diabetes
  3. depression
  4. high blood pressure
  5. morning sickness, sometimes so severe it can nearly kill her.
  6. placenta previa
  7. placenta abruption
  8. preeclapsia
  9. pelvic pain
  10. deep vein thrombosis
these can kill in some cases, and will cause her permanent issues. so yeah she is selfish but sometimes you have to be, thats not a bad thing. women should not be expected to be martyred for a potential life when she already has one. she does not forfeit her life because an egg became fertilised.


Actually consent to sex is consent to pregnancy whether or not you want to believe it. As for the conditions of pregnancies you mentioned they are extremely rare. the majority of births are natural with no issues at all. Also may i ask are you a male or female?
 





saki

Veteran
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Messages
545
Likes
971
...not about abortion.... more like training young kindergartners to 'need' an abortion... and the sooner the better...
...brought to your child's classroom by your friends at Planned Parenthood...

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ed-book-seeks-groom-children-early-onset-sex/
Former Planned Parenthood Trainer: Sex Ed Book Seeks ‘to Groom Children for Early Onset of Sex’

A former Title X family planning training manager and volunteer educator for Planned Parenthood says the abortion vendor’s new graphic sex ed book is intended “to groom children” for early sexual experiences.

Monica Cline told Breitbart News that Planned Parenthood’s new sex ed book, titled In Case You’re Curious, “targets children with just enough cuteness” to be able to present itself as a resource for curious children seeking answers to questions about sex.

Cline, who left Planned Parenthood after she learned the organization’s main goal was to develop a continued stream of abortions, said the book gives the appearance of being “age appropriate” while it doles out “a whole lot of hypersexualized answers to groom children for early onset of sex”:

Abortion is health care — and it needs to be included in conversations about sex and sexual health at home and in the classroom: https://p.ppfa.org/2GZMYPg via @rewire_news

The first chapter of the book is titled “Can You Die from Masturbating Too Much?” Subsequent chapters include “Do Guys Really Cum in Their Sleep?” and “Is Twelve Too Young to Know I’m Bi?”

“They justify their actions by stating that they are simply answering the questions of curious youth,” explained Cline, who left Planned Parenthood and ultimately founded her own website and organization called It Takes a Family. Now, she urges parents to “reclaim parenthood” and provides them with resources needed to build up trust in family bonds.

Cline said:

Children’s curiosity is a positive indicator of proper development, but what they learn on that journey needs to be carefully monitored and taught by parents, not Planned Parenthood. I can already hear some of you shouting, “not all parents speak to their kids about this,” or “some kids have awful parents.” We agree on that point. But withholding the safest and most beneficial lessons for only those with good parents is advantage discrimination. You can’t tell me that some kids deserve healthy and protective information while others have to settle for sex at a young age and compromise health. All children, from all walks of life, deserve the safest and most beneficial education that protects them physically and emotionally:​
Hooking up? Here are 12 ways to do it right: https://p.ppfa.org/31AgBhN via @TeenVogue

Planned Parenthood continues to put its seal of approval on young people having sex.

“Hooking up?” asked Planned Parenthood in a recent tweet. “Here are 12 ways to do it right.” The tweet contains a link to a Teen Vogue article, titled “How to Be an Ethical Hook-Up Partner,” which targets adolescents. The article states:

Despite the often-negative press, hookups, or, short term sexual/intimate encounters, like one-night stands, summer flings, and semester-long friends-with-benefits relationships, can come with a lot of descriptors: “casual,” “fun,” “random,” and “spontaneous” can be some, but can they also be ethical, considerate, and satisfying? We think yes!​
Teen Vogue’s idea of “ethics” is reminding young people who are “hooking up” to be open about which sexually transmitted infections (STIs) they already have.

After her experience working with Planned Parenthood, Cline said she believes the organization uses “a child’s natural curiosity to manipulate and enthrall them into a world of dehumanization, objectification and risky behavior that leads to negative health outcomes.”

She pointed to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report that revealed the number of cases of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in the United States has skyrocketed for the fifth year in a row.

“The CDC has reported more staggering numbers of the STD epidemic among youth and Planned Parenthood’s response is to further sexualize children in the name of sexual rights,” Cline said, adding:

Their clever marketing and rhetoric deceives children, and many adults, into believing that sexuality is a game to be played without consequence. They have taken something that is positive and life changing, and reduced it to sexual experimentation using condoms, lubrication, getting tested for disease, getting treatment, aborting unplanned pregnancies and then start all over again. We can do better than that.​
Not sure how to answer your kid’s questions about sex, sexuality, bodies, or puberty? Use our sex ed chatbot Roo with your child to help facilitate conversations and answer questions → http://Roo.PlannedParenthood.org

Cline said when asked if there is anything that frightens Planned Parenthood, she responds, “Parents!”

“Planned Parenthood is afraid of educated, engaged, protective and confident parents,” she asserted:

Remember, they think that parents are a barrier to service. They depend on the public submitting to them as the “sex experts” but they have little to offer with their low standards and bullying tactics against parents who want to protect their children from disease, unplanned pregnancies and compromised emotional health.
Cline said the job of teaching children about sex belongs to parents, not Planned Parenthood.

“We can stop Planned Parenthood from sexualizing our children by having parents lead the conversation at home, in the community and through legislation,” she said. “It’s time we reject Planned Parenthood’s practice of eliminating the parent from their children’s health care and education.”
 





Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
2,358
Likes
3,750
Strictly from a woman's health perspective
how?
its still a miscarriage by design, after all miscarriage is still abortion. if you use herbs, drugs or medical intervention its still, there to exspell a pregnancy. so how is using a herb different from a medical procedure, if your against abortion, due to the expulsion of a fetus then surely you are against eh use of herbs, how is it different?
An abortion is an invasive procedure and has been linked to an increased risk of endometriosis, uterine and breast cancers.
 





Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
45
Likes
65
An abortion is an invasive procedure and has been linked to an increased risk of endometriosis, uterine and breast cancers.
Miscarriages are abortions, just spontaneous abortions, abortion pills or herbs are abortions and then there's medical abortions, they are literally all abortions. Not just the medical ones, your greatly misinformed, and there are no connections between Abortions and cancers or endometriosis, literally non. They are all lies by the poor forced birthers
 





Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
45
Likes
65
Actually consent to sex is consent to pregnancy whether or not you want to believe it. As for the conditions of pregnancies you mentioned they are extremely rare. the majority of births are natural with no issues at all. Also may i ask are you a male or female?
Seeing as a woman can only get pregnant at certain times then no sex is not consenting to pregnancy.
Until medical intervention 1 in 5 births ended in death, for mother, baby or both. Women today still die from childbirth or pregnancy, you really do live in a cosy fantasy world, they don't call giving birth a holiday, it's called labour for a reason. I know several women who nearly died from childbirth and pregnancy, just two examples, my cousin nearly died from blood lose and a friend was ina coma for a week after a difficult delivery. Those are just two my own mother spent 9 months in hospital when pregnant with my sister due to complications.
I can give you some more pregnancy complications that are quite common, stroke, water retention, excessive urination, sickness, emotional and hormonal issues, back pain, stretch skin.
No one should be forced to go through this if they do not choose to, for anyone or thing.
Pregnancy isn't some magical mystical experience, women die from it, even those who truly want to be pregnant suffer, no woman who is over due goes, oh I wish this could last forever, no they are uncomfortable and want it out.
I haven't even given you the list of complications in labour, just from the nine months of pregnancy.
 





Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
2,358
Likes
3,750
Miscarriages are abortions, just spontaneous abortions, abortion pills or herbs are abortions and then there's medical abortions, they are literally all abortions. Not just the medical ones, your greatly misinformed, and there are no connections between Abortions and cancers or endometriosis, literally non. They are all lies by the poor forced birthers
Abstract
PIP:
Abortion may increase the risk of breast cancer. Leon Bradlow, M.D., director of the Laboratory of Biochemical Endocrinology and the Strang-Cornell Cancer Research Laboratory in New York, believes that pregnancy protects against breast cancer through the differentiation of breast cells during the second half of pregnancy. Since estrogen, which increases breast cancer risk, is secreted during the first half of pregnancy in order to stimulate breast growth, abortion at that time will expose the mother to high concentrations of estrogen when cells are undifferentiated. Bradlow believes the public should be made aware of studies showing this. Louise Brinton, M.D., of the National Cancer Institute's Division of Cancer Etiology, disagrees because there are many studies that show no link between breast cancer and abortion. Malcolm Pike, M.D., who did the first study linking the two in 1981 (Women less than 33 years of age who had an abortion were 2.4 times more likely to get breast cancer.), declined comment because he had not studied recent data. Holly Howe, Ph.D., of the New York State Department of Health, examined data from fetal death certificates and breast cancer incidence records (1451 women between 1976 and 1980), to find that women (40 years of age) whose pregnancies had been terminated had a relative risk of breast cancer ranging from 1.5 to 1.9. An unpublished study by Janet Daling, M.D., of the Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center in Seattle, shows a 50% to 90% increase in risk for women who had an abortion before the age of 18. Lynn Rosenberg, M.D., of the Slone Epidemiology Unit of the Boston University School of Medicine, based on a study of 3200 women with breast cancer and 4844 controls, found no relationship between abortion and risk. Brinton is currently conducting a study on breast cancer risk that includes abortion evaluation.

Studies with opposing results is not the same as no connection. I'd say you're greatly uninformed because apparently you haven't looked at a PubMed. I admit that using herbs could still increase the risk of breast cancer, still far less traumatic on a woman's body.
 





saki

Veteran
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Messages
545
Likes
971
...."killed more people than Ted Bundy".... don't really know what to add to that statement...
...the 'money-shot': "I read an article that compared abortion to the Holocaust, and it was the big "a-ha" moment for me when I realized that here I was killing all these people because I didn't consider them to be human beings."
...PS... do not know why, but my c/p of this article appears in 'strike-out' characters.... not my doing....

https://www.theblaze.com/news/former-abortion-doctor-d
Retired abortion doctor: I've killed more people than Ted Bundy
'Science is really on the pro-life side'

In a chilling conversation on "The Van Maren Show," a doctor said she deeply regrets having performed 500 to 1,000 abortions throughout her career: "I killed a lot more people than Ted Bundy."

The retired OB-GYN, Dr. Kathi Aultman, told host Jonathon Van Maren that her first ethical concerns came during her medical training when she realized she was attempting to save unborn babies who were the same age as those she was aborting. "That was the only time that I had reservations, but I was able to tuck it in the back of my brain and forget about it. It wasn't until I had my baby that I began to see the fetus as a human being for the first time."

Dr. Aultman, is now a national advocate for pro-life legislation. She has testified before Congress, including at the "End Infanticide: Examining the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act" hearing.

'Science is really on pro-life side'
In an interview with the Daily Signal, Dr. Aultman said her mind changed on abortion when she realized the practice dehumanizes unborn babies in a fashion similar to the horrors perpetrated by Germany Nazis.
I read an article that compared abortion to the Holocaust, and it was the big "a-ha" moment for me when I realized that here I was killing all these people because I didn't consider them to be human beings. And that's how the Germans were. They did not consider the Jews and the Russians and the other people that they exterminated to be human beings. And from that point on, I became pro-life and actually answered an email that I got asking if there would be anyone willing to go to Congress and testify.​
The retired doctor also noted that pro-abortion arguments run counter to scientific evidence:
cience is really on the pro-life side. There actually is no other place that we can define the beginning of life other than when a sperm and an egg meet. We know that these babies develop quickly, and that they feel pain, and yet the media never [report] that kind of stuff. It's always pooh-poohed or told it's a blatant lie so that people aren't aware. So many times when I have spoken to people, they are absolutely appalled when babies beyond five months are being aborted. They think, "Well, that doesn't happen. Oh, it's only in the first trimester." And I think the vast majority of Americans do not approve of abortions past the first trimester, especially when you're dismembering them to get them out.

Dr. Aultman told Van Maren she is remorseful for past line of work. "I never even thought about the pain the baby was experiencing as it was having its arms and legs pulled off and that makes me really sad."

Over 11,000 late-term abortions per year
The Guttmacher Institute reported in September that 862,320 abortions were formed in the United States in 2017, a 7 percent drop from 926,190 in 2014. Excluding miscarriages, the report noted that 18 percent of pregnancies are terminated each year.


Although at least one 21-week-old baby has been born prematurely and saved, the Guttmacher study notes that 1.3 percent of abortions happen at or after 21 weeks. This means an estimated 11,210 unborn babies are aborted each year that may have otherwise been viable. As David French noted in National Review, this figure is comparable to the number of murders committed using firearms during the same period.

Contrary to claims by pro-abortion activists, a 2013 study stated that most late-term abortions are not performed for reasons related to the health of the mother or the fetus. "[D]ata suggest that most women seeking later terminations are not doing so for reasons of fetal anomaly or life endangerment."
 





Last edited:

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
8,575
Likes
4,127
'Science is really on pro-life side'
In an interview with the Daily Signal, Dr. Aultman said her mind changed on abortion when she realized the practice dehumanizes unborn babies in a fashion similar to the horrors perpetrated by Germany Nazis.
I read an article that compared abortion to the Holocaust, and it was the big "a-ha" moment for me when I realized that here I was killing all these people because I didn't consider them to be human beings. And that's how the Germans were. They did not consider the Jews and the Russians and the other people that they exterminated to be human beings. And from that point on, I became pro-life and actually answered an email that I got asking if there would be anyone willing to go to Congress and testify.​
That’s what the pro abortion side has been doing all along...dehumanizing unborn babies..calling it the bump and a clump of cells. Yet, a baby is born out of the woman’s body..I guess that clump turns human as soon as the head sees daylight...lol!
 





Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
45
Likes
65
That’s what the pro abortion side has been doing all along...dehumanizing unborn babies..calling it the bump and a clump of cells. Yet, a baby is born out of the woman’s body..I guess that clump turns human as soon as the head sees daylight...lol!
but it is a clump of cells first, its not like a tiny microscopic baby shoots out of a mans penis during ejaculation, of that was true masturbation would be murder too, ever period a woman has should be mourned. there is no baby until later into the pregnancy, this is when abortion is ruled out, except for extreme cases like the fetus/baby has died and is going septic for the woman slowly killing her, or the fetus has no brain ect
 





Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
45
Likes
65
I think someone's had an abortion and is trying to make excuses to make themselves feel better....
who? if your talking about me then your wrong, my uterus has never carried or expelled any potential or actual humans, im quite childless and prefer to remain so. i havent even had any oopsies or risks of pregnancy or even maybes. but thanks for the concern.
i just believe a woman is more than just a walking incubator, and the choice is hers alone if she wishes to feed and gestate a human