elsbet
Superstar
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2017
- Messages
- 5,122
Ah, of course-- as the lawyers say, then: "living expenses... and much more."Profitable? It’s illegal to be paid to give your child up for adoption... what are you talking about?
Micro vs macro, it is possible something is difficult/sad for an individual (the actual abortion) and also good for women’s rights (the ability to have that abortion)
Win-win.
I disagree, though, on the late-term, third trimester legality of abortion. While I don't think the government should dictate *anything* a person can and cannot do, with or to, their own person, I think physicians should barred from performing"late term" infanticide. There are very rare (very tragic) medical situations that may warrant personal consideration of abortion-- even though it may not be deemed "medically necessary" from an ethical standpoint-- and those should, by all means, be considered on a case by case basis. Convenience is not one of them.