Abortion And Eugenics

[Etagloc]

Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood

Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems. -Margaret Sanger

The campaign for birth control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims of eugenics. -Margaret Sanger

As an advocate of birth control I wish … to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the 'unfit' and the 'fit,' admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation.... On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective. -Margaret Sanger

If plants, and live stock as well, require space and air, sunlight and love, children need them even more. The only real wealth of our country lies in the men and women of the next generation. A farmer would rather produce a thousand thoroughbreds than a million runts. -Margaret Sanger

The main objects of the Population Congress would be [...] (f) to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization. -Margaret Sanger

Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives. So, in compliance with nature’s working plan, we must permit womanhood its full development before we can expect of it efficient motherhood. If we are to make racial progress, this development of womanhood must precede motherhood in every individual woman. -Margaret Sanger

Those vast, complex, interrelated organizations aiming to control and to diminish the spread of misery and destitution and all the menacing evils that spring out of this sinisterly fertile soil, are the surest sign that our civilization has bred, is breeding and is perpetuating constantly increasing numbers of defectives, delinquents and dependents. My criticism, therefore, is not directed at the "failure" of philanthropy, but rather at its success. -Margaret Sanger

Eugenics aims to arouse the enthusiasm or the interest of the people in the welfare of the world fifteen or twenty generations in the future. On its negative side it shows us that we are paying for and even submitting to the dictates of an ever increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all—that the wealth of individuals and of states is being diverted from the development and the progress of human expression and civilization. -Margaret Sanger

Well I suppose a subject like that is really so personal that it is entirely up to the parents to decide, but from my view, I believe there should be no more babies in starving countries for the next ten years. -Margaret Sanger

 

[Aero]

Now you are anti birth control too? Wow.

 

[Etagloc]

To learn more about this urgent subject, there is a great documentary called MAAFA 21 that you can view here. This stuff makes my stomache churn and it disgusts me and I'm not surprised when middle-class white liberals don't care but that's to be expected- they're not the ones who are being threatened with the genocide that the rest of us face but we have power so we can fight this without white liberals. I am not against anyone, nor trying to create racial tension- but we whose survival is threatened deserve to know the truth. And I wish death to the white supremacist power structure and I have faith that it will collapse before this century has ended. Here is the documentary:

 

[Etagloc]

Now you are anti birth control too? Wow.

I'm not anti-anything. I'm pro-facts and pro-truth.

 

[Etagloc]

Now you are anti birth control too? Wow.

Maybe the KKK and white supremacy doesn't bother you (how CONVENIENT) but you won't be the only one seeing this. And I've done nothing but present facts.

 

[Tatilina]

 

[Tatilina]

 

[Etagloc]

Thank you, Tanya. Your support means a lot to me.

 

[Aero]

Trust me I'm against the white power structure too. But I don't see denying basic health rights doing that. I see you helping the Eugenics movement actually. Because a person in Jail is also a person that doesn't reproduce. A person who is dead doesn't reproduce. A person on drugs, is an unfit parent or wont reproduce.

You want more people born into the power structure. Without solving the reason women seek abortions. So I think your strategy is flawed is all I'm saying.

 

[Tatilina]

Thank you, Tanya. Your support means a lot to me.

You're welcome. This video sums it shortly against the argument that it's all about the woman's choice and her body. That statement is supposed to be the smoke screen. I hate racism and I am glad to find someone who has dug a little deeper than the most do.

Let's call it for what it really is, genocide, racism, and murder.

 

[mecca]

http://time.com/4081760/margaret-sanger-history-eugenics/

Much of the controversy stems from a 1939 letter in which Sanger outlined her plan to reach out to black leaders — specifically ministers — to help dispel community suspicions about the family planning clinics she was opening in the South.

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members,” she wrote. It was, as the Washington Post called it, an “inartfully written” sentence, but one that, in context, describes the sort of preposterous allegations she feared — not her actual mission. The irony is that it has been used to propagate those very allegations. Cruz’s letter to the director of the National Portrait Gallery, for example, quotes only the first half of the sentence.

Sanger’s stated mission was to empower women to make their own reproductive choices. She did focus her efforts on minority communities, because that was where, due to poverty and limited access to health care, women were especially vulnerable to the effects of unplanned pregnancy. As she framed it, birth control was the fundamental women’s rights issue. “Enforced motherhood,” she wrote in 1914, “is the most complete denial of a woman’s right to life and liberty.”

 

[Tatilina]

The Negro Project


The Negro Project was initiated in 1939 by Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. It was a collaborative effort between the American Birth Control League and Sanger’s Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau.1 For a eugenist, it wasn’t controversial, it was integral to the implementation of eugenics to eliminate the ‘unfit’. Eugenics is “a science that deals with the improvement (as by control of human mating) of hereditary qualities of a race or breed”.2 Negative eugenics focused on preventing the birth of those it considered inferior or unfit. This was the foundation of Sanger’s Birth Control Policy and advocated throughout her writings, speeches, and her periodicals including “Pivot of Civilization”, “Plan for Peace” and countless Birth Control Review articles. The pseudo-science (racial hygiene theory) of negative eugenics influenced social policy and eugenics-based legislation (Immigration Act of 19243, segregation laws, sterilization laws) and led to the racial hygiene theory adopted by the Nazis. Noted eugenist, Eugen Fischer, who was funded by The Rockefeller Foundation (one of many same organizations that also financially supported Sanger’s work), was responsible for the Nazi adoption of racial hygiene theory at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute that led to the eugenics implementation of the holocaust.4 The connections between American Eugenics and the horrors of Nazi Germany are irrefutable. The preponderance of evidence of where Sanger wanted to go (although she decried the atrocities of the holocaust after WWII) shows the ignorance and naivete of eugenics philosophy and its eventual conclusion left undeterred. The Negro Project was but a precursor to what eugenists wanted to implement on a much larger scale.

“…those of us who believe that the benefits of Planned Parenthood as a vital key to the elimination of human waste must reach the entire population, also believe that a double effort must be made to extend this program as a public health measure to Negroes who need is proportionately greater.”

— Dr. Dorothy Ferebee (black physician serving as the Chairman of the Family Planning Committee of the National Council of Negro Women) in a presentation at 1942 annual meeting of the Birth Control Federation of America (Planned Parenthood). (One should note that today, both Planned Parenthood and the National Council of Negro Women are radically pro-abortion.)

This is the same Sanger who persuaded a few reluctant, yet incredibly influential, black ministers to join in her Birth Control movement. To dispel the rising doubts among those who objected to Birth Control on religious and moral grounds, Sanger wrote that “the ministers' work is also important…offering to train him in their ideals because “we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members”.6 Many use this statement to bolster the claim that Sanger wanted to exterminate all of the black population, but this statement is about reducing a certain type of black individual that Sanger believed should be eliminated, sterilized, or segregated onto farms.7 Those who were poor and (supposedly) less intelligent. Eugenists believed the entirety of the black population were intellectually and racially inferior. With the help of elite and famous African-Americans Mary McLeod Bethune, W.E.B. DuBois, and Rev. Adam Clayton Powell, Sr., the Negro Project was able to be sold as a false solution to poverty and high birth rates. It is crucial, however, to understand this endeavor in conjunction with Sanger’s dominant efforts of ‘eliminating the unfit’ and her hatred of charitable organizations. She devotes an entire chapter on charities and how those who finance them “are dropping millions into rosewater philanthropies and charities that are silly at best and vicious at worst.”8

“Organized charity itself is the symptom of a malignant social disease…Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks [of people] that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant.”
— Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, Chapter V, “Cruelty of Charity”

Abortion is today’s Birth Control.
Frederick Osborne, President of the American Eugenics Society (1946-1952) declared after the Supremely wrong Roe decision: “Birth control and abortion are turning out to be great eugenic advances of our time.” Eugenicists fought for decades to eliminate those they considered “unfit”. It is by historical design that, today, nearly 40% of all African-American pregnancies end in induced abortion.9 There is more access to birth control than ever before and the huge disparity in poverty rates between whites and blacks continues. Fatherlessness and poverty are rampant. Unintended pregnancy rates in the black community continue to rise. Today, the same mouthpieces for Planned Parenthood are claiming “lack of access” while black women access abortion clinics at 5 times the rate of white women. Abortion kills more black lives (363,705)10 than all other causes of death combined (285,522).11 In NYC, home of Planned Parenthood, more black babies are aborted than born alive! Abortion, no matter the race, is a tragedy. But in the black community, it is an epidemic. Mainstream media, black celebrities, health care professionals and so-called black leaders continue to shill for Planned Parenthood, while our churches (who stood against injustice during the Civil Rights Movement) are mostly silent. Regardless, the truth screams loud and clear. Under the false liberty of ‘reproductive freedom,’ we are killing our very future.

http://www.toomanyaborted.com/thenegroproject/

 

[mecca]

http://time.com/4081760/margaret-sanger-history-eugenics/

In 1966, Martin Luther King Jr. made clear that he agreed that Sanger’s life’s work was anything but inhumane. In 1966, when King received Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger Award in Human Rights, he praised her contributions to the black community. “There is a striking kinship between our movement and Margaret Sanger’s early efforts,” he said. “…Margaret Sanger had to commit what was then called a crime in order to enrich humanity, and today we honor her courage and vision.”

As Gloria Steinem pointed out in a 1998 essay for TIME, Sanger’s embrace of the eugenics rhetoric may have been less a heartfelt belief than a political ploy to broaden birth control’s appeal. But even speaking the language of eugenics could be insidious. Steinem writes:

[Sanger] adopted the mainstream eugenics language of the day, partly as a tactic, since many eugenicists opposed birth control on the grounds that the educated would use it more. Though her own work was directed toward voluntary birth control and public health programs, her use of eugenics language probably helped justify sterilization abuse. Her misjudgments should cause us to wonder what parallel errors we are making now and to question any tactics that fail to embody the ends we hope to achieve.​

 

[Etagloc]

@mecca it is undeniable that she was a racist and eugenicist. Eugenics and depopulation are promoted by the elites so of course the elite-controlled mainstream media would try to hide the truth about her.

 

[Etagloc]

Martin Luther King is not some modern Jesus and Gloria Steinem was a CIA shill

http://www.rense.com/general21/hw.htm

 

[Etagloc]

 

[Etagloc]

 

[Lisa]

Abortion is today’s Birth Control.

No truer statement

 

[Lisa]

Does that include other countries as well...or just the US?

 

[Damien50]

Stupid question but is Margaret Sanger forcing women to get abortions? I don't see that, I know of her racism and eugenics quite well yet are we trying to use the

Guns and liquors stores on every corner in poor areas causing death and crime

?