Karlysymon
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2017
- Messages
- 7,324
Good point made by you, polymoog, and others. The hypocritical climate change peddlers could care less about pollution (the US military is one of the top polluters in the world) or geoengineering. I just watched the first 1/2 of this documentary so the topic is on my mind:Of course....they won't acknowledge that...
Wow several of these articles fit that description and you can add this one to the list:Absurdities for the day
Censorship is coming.....alot of material on geoengineering may disappear.
Wikipedia Deletes "List of Scientists who Disagree with the Scientific Consensus on Global Warming" in Astonishing Act of Censorship - Electroverse
Some arbitrary (or otherwise) attempt at censorship should not be successful on the back of loud "opinions". Dissenting voices are key.electroverse.net
You got a new picture!
"Russian ambassador Vassily Nebenzia complained that Monday’s proposed resolution would turn “a scientific and economic issue into a politicized question”, divert the council’s attention from what he called “genuine” sources of conflict in various places and give the council a pretext to intervene in virtually any country on the planet.Russia vetoes UN security council resolution linking climate crisis to international peace
The resolution proposed that the climate crisis could potentially threaten ‘global peace, security and stability’www.theguardian.com
“This approach would be a ticking time bomb,” he said."
What irks me about people who believe in climate change (as peddled by MSM) is that they aren’t willing to meet in the middle and atleast acknowledge the reality of weather warfare or geoengineering. Ofcourse, the source of the resistance is that they would have to constantly question who/what is actually responsible for freak weather incidents. Yes, the weather is getting crazier but who is changing it? Is it natural or induced? And if it is induced, then what’s the motive? It is in some peoples’ interest to manipulate the weather because….as a present example…we wouldn’t have academics (Marianna Mazzucato) proposing “climate lockdowns” and gross green austerity that, coincidentally, is meant to benefit a small class of people and economically crush everyone else.Good point made by you, polymoog, and others. The hypocritical climate change peddlers could care less about pollution (the US military is one of the top polluters in the world) or geoengineering. I just watched the first 1/2 of this documentary so the topic is on my mind:
Well, atleast he and Mazzucato are brazen enough to admit that mandates/force are what’s going to cut it. How do you bribe or nudge people into austerity anyway? To give up their cars, meat, heating etc? It’s obvious “they” are going to use the sticks rather than carrots.Wow several of these articles fit that description and you can add this one to the list:
If You Think Vaccine Mandate Pushback is Bad...
At some point, governments will start using more sticks than carrots to break our deadly dependence on fossil fuels. How will humanity respond?
This tweet was originally posted in the thread on Oregon fires, last year, so i think it's fitting to drop it here too.They causing fires and droughts in California and chemtrails everywhere. They lying about everything 24/7 so I don't need proof.
My friend who lives in Oregon said antifa was setting fires and causing problems in rural places last year.This tweet was originally posted in the thread on Oregon fires, last year, so i think it's fitting to drop it here too.
"What irks me about people who believe in climate change (as peddled by MSM) is that they aren’t willing to meet in the middle and atleast acknowledge the reality of weather warfare or geoengineering."What irks me about people who believe in climate change (as peddled by MSM) is that they aren’t willing to meet in the middle and atleast acknowledge the reality of weather warfare or geoengineering. Ofcourse, the source of the resistance is that they would have to constantly question who/what is actually responsible for freak weather incidents. Yes, the weather is getting crazier but who is changing it? Is it natural or induced? And if it is induced, then what’s the motive? It is in some peoples’ interest to manipulate the weather because….as a present example…we wouldn’t have academics (Marianna Mazzucato) proposing “climate lockdowns” and gross green austerity that, coincidentally, is meant to benefit a small class of people and economically crush everyone else.
People like Prince William scream all day about climate change but unsurprisingly won’t so much as acknowledge geoengineering…something that was orchestrated for his wedding day so that it would be picturesque. Iam sure most people that day thought it was a naturally beautiful sunny day and were thankful for the weather, unbeknownst to them of the modification. So it begets the question; if the Royal Family could manipulate the weather for a wedding (something benign), who’s to say the British gov’t wouldn’t do the same for nefarious purposes…both at home and abroad?
It’s difficult enough to convince someone that weather warfare is real because they can’t see someone in the sky moving the levers (so to speak) but it is also a greater threat to any resistance against the NWO. I mean, we can all refuse to take the shots and throw away our cellphones to render vaxx passes irrelevant but how do you actually fight back against the manipulation of the elements? What defense do we actually have against induced earthquakes or tornadoes or freak storms? Yes, people at NASA and NOAA can all walk away from their desks but iam sure there is contingency plans for an eventuality like that.
“The Dimming” has been posted a couple times on the forum. I haven’t yet come around to watch it but I will. Dane Wigington has an extensive list of weather modification patents on his site, going back to the 1800s. There’s also copious amounts of military literature on the subject, for anyone willing to look, but I guess some people just want to continue believing what the paid-for-peddlers peddle.
Well, atleast he and Mazzucato are brazen enough to admit that mandates/force are what’s going to cut it. How do you bribe or nudge people into austerity anyway? To give up their cars, meat, heating etc? It’s obvious “they” are going to use the sticks rather than carrots.
I'm surprised you think that way. It was actually the many links and videos shared here that opened my eyes to the truth behind the climate change/global warming psyop. Much of the Left feels that yes, environmental activism has been co-opted by the banks and mega-corporations but clearly the entire movement has its origins in the UN, CFR, Club of Rome, and other globalist NGO's. Global warming is a manufactured crisis, a tool of the technocrats and billionaire class. The importance of this thread is understanding the World Bank's covid reset was only a stage of a larger operation- namely Agenda 21."What irks me about people who believe in climate change (as peddled by MSM) is that they aren’t willing to meet in the middle and atleast acknowledge the reality of weather warfare or geoengineering."
I think climate change deniers are either too morally corrupt or ignorant to be taken seriously. But that quote of yours there does make a lot of sense.