It's not women of feminism's fault that houses are unaffordable. Women have a right to be able to get an education and go into any career they want and they should be able to at any time regardless of how hard it is to live off of even a two earner household nowadays.
This isn't the fault of feminism this is the fault of people who think a woman has to be the one to manage and do all the work in the household. This should actually be blamed on the lingering sexist and pre-feminist mentality. Feminists want both the man and the women to share the workload and raise their children and do the chores together.
Or perhaps the sexism and bigotry can be slowly resolved and people can refrain from mistreating each other for their gender. Most people are working on bettering themselves. Each generation raised in a better environment with better values will be more and more against sexism and know why it's wrong and should not keep going.
This is an inaccurate comparison.
Lol evolution has nothing to do with it. Feminism is about women getting rights and being treated fairly. It's about bringing awareness to and minimizing sexism and sexism's effects on society.
All men are not pigs and this behavior is not normal. Many men would not act this way, a properly raised and educated man would not even think to say these things because he would have some respect for himself and others.
No they don't, half the population can't be generalized into a stereotype.
Thanks for the reply, it perfectly matches what I've described. In economic systems, things like fairness and equality aren't relevant. Am I saying it's inherently racist or sexist? No, I am saying it's basically a big math problem and it is inherently indifferent. The system works itself out to have the most qualified people in the most appropriate spots and this allows those companies to succeed and to have more success than others who aren't as effective. If a woman is better suited to a particular job and can't get hired or promoted to the position that she's better at then it harms the company or organization that is discriminating. Someone will hire her or promote her and because she is so good at her job the place she works for will succeed and then do better than the company that failed to recognize her potential. This is how economic systems work. If the woman can't find a place to hire her then the onus is on her to start her own company or organization.
So how is the NBA example not applicable? It's a system where team owners seek players that will play better than other teams and give them victory. An employer seeks employees that will do the best work, thereby ensuring the highest profits and a competitive edge over rivals. You can't legislate "fairness" into this equation without inhibiting success and discriminating against the more qualified individuals. It ends up discriminating just like the previous system but not it also screws over everyone else.
Up until the 20th century, work was typically very hard. The workplace was way different than what it is today. It was mostly manual labor either through manufacturing or farming. Going out to work everyday was far different than sitting in a cubicle in the A/C and pushing a pen all day. Do you think that men and women are identical physically? Men were better at these jobs, naturally and the women were better suited at home raising the family. It worked out for both parties because women are naturally more nurturing. Feminists are triggered that society dared to take this shape of discrimination against women but it was actually quite organic in nature. It wasn't the diabolical plot of the patriarchy.
Why is it this way? God made it that way. Evolution is quite relevant because it removes the whole design element away from the family structure. Man and woman didn't invent or create the nuclear family, God did. The root of this movement is rebellion. It might seem to be rebelling against an evil patriarchy but it's actually rebellion against God. If God didn't design it, then everything is relative and it doesn't matter who raises the kids or who goes out and works. When you say things like feminists want both parents to share the workload of raising the kids and earning money, it sounds really great on paper if you don't think this system was God-given. What actually happens is that women must now work to support the home in addition to the man but they are also expected and naturally inclined to want to handle the household duties. This puts more stress on women than ever and they end up wanting to blame someone for the situation, which ends up being men.
"Or perhaps the sexism and bigotry can be slowly resolved and people can refrain from mistreating each other for their gender. Most people are working on bettering themselves. Each generation raised in a better environment with better values will be more and more against sexism and know why it's wrong and should not keep going."
You see this is just wishful thinking again. Things just don't work like this in the real-world. I am not saying that I don't want them to, I am just realistic. People get offended and go overboard and end up discriminating against people that were never responsible for their original issue and then those people react creating a cycle that looks much like a pendulum. That's just how things work. Again, if you don't believe God created us and that man sinned and now has a sinful nature then this seems like a completely feasible goal(even though historical analysis should show you it isn't.) The bedrock of society is it's adherence and recognition to the fact they were created by a God. When you take that away then it becomes the rule of the jungle.
All of these things can be chalked up to not wanting to admit there's a God who holds us responsible and doesn't just want us to follow His plan because He says so but because it's actually the best system for us. We are happier that way. The modern agenda is that everything is relative and everything is the same. You can be any sex or gender that you feel you identify with and you can be attracted to any sex or gender you want to. No man and especially not an imaginary God should be able to tell you that you can't do something. Do you agree that children should be taken away from their parents because the parents won't let the still-minor child take hormone blockers to change their sex? If I were a feminist then I would be angry about woman of the year going to a man(Jenner) instead of a woman.
In the end this isn't a fight against man, or sexism or bigotry(not that these two don't exist) but rather against the facts. A good example here is that you won't allow a stereotype that women like to gossip. Stereotyping is basically against the law, despite the fact that it's a natural survival mechanism and one that you can't simply wish away. Certain people can be expected to act a certain way, it doesn't mean you know that person or have defined them. This is why they collect big data. It's possible to implement successful marketing strategies by studying how certain groups of people act and then catering towards that behavior. In fact that is how marketing actually works. This new attitude of "you can't define me, you don't know me" is everywhere and it has become a grave sin to anticipate a behavior that a certain group is predisposed to. If you were to be walking near a rattlesnake and hear the rattle and see that it's close then you wouldn't go touching it would you? Well, certain people have negative characteristics that should be avoided from time to time and it's not a crime to act on that instinct. But in our world using your God-given instincts and assigning characteristics to certain groups by analyzing trends has become conflated with prejudice and discrimination. Feminism just fits into the larger umbrella of this bigger war on the facts. I haven't even touched on how it's being used to justify murder on our most defenseless population(infants.)
I am all for women having the same rights like voting, driving, property-ownership and etc. I am all for them having equal opportunity in education and in the workplace. Opportunity is not the same as success though. There are many jobs that I would love to do but I fully understand that it's not possible for me to a viable candidate based on unchangeable characteristics that I was born with. I am not on board with discrimination against men or assault on the nuclear family. I am not on board with killing babies. I am sure you'll break my post down and take the time to tell me that I'm wrong and that you don't agree. It sort of sums of the argument though, it's more about feelings and emotions and desires rather than thinking about actual facts and the greater good for all men. As I said before this has been implemented by satanists in high places, and I have no delusions that it will change without divine assistance.