Karlysymon
Superstar
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2017
- Messages
- 6,840
The media told “you” to “Stand with Ukraine” & “hate Putin”. The next thing you know, you are staring poverty, food & gas shortages in the face….aswell as, in Larry Fink’s(BLACKROCK CEO) words…accelerating the adoption of CBDCs. Certainly, not things you bargained for in “standing with Ukraine”.
In the same vein, abortion rights/women’s rights carries the very real prospect of putting the US Constitution into the shredder and tearing the country apart at the seams. But by the time people wake up or wise up to the game being played, it will be too late because “By 2030………..”(everyone knows the drill by now, fill in the blanks).
"A constitutional amendment proposal supporting or limiting abortion rights would, like any amendment, require a two-thirds vote of both the US House and US Senate — a much greater threshold than Congress passing a law, which Democrats are also expected to try in an all-but-futile attempt to codify Roe v. Wade for the long term.
If such a constitution amendment proposal somehow passed, three-fourths of state legislatures must then ratify it for the amendment to become law.
From the 1970s through the early 2000s, abortion rights opponents — overwhelmingly Republicans — tried this route. They proposed a series of materially similar constitutional amendment proposals, which all sought to overturn Roe v. Wade. Often dubbed the "Human Life Amendment," none came close to passage out of either the House or Senate.
Alternately, two-thirds of US states could request the nation conduct a constitutional convention — sometimes known as an Article V convention — for the purpose of amending the Constitution. Three-fourths of states would again have to ratify any amendments the convention proposed. There are also fundamental questions about how a constitutional convention might even work, with the Congressional Research Service noting numerous unanswered questions.
Such a convention has never occurred in US history.
The likelihood of one occurring for the purposes of creating a constitutional right to abortion seems as remote today as ever, particularly given that Republicans control a notable majority of state legislative bodies, according to the latest count by the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Despite the odds, some Democrats almost certainly will advocate making the right to an abortion the Constitution's 28th amendment."
In the same vein, abortion rights/women’s rights carries the very real prospect of putting the US Constitution into the shredder and tearing the country apart at the seams. But by the time people wake up or wise up to the game being played, it will be too late because “By 2030………..”(everyone knows the drill by now, fill in the blanks).
Is it?? Think bigger……iam not going to be surprised at all if this quickly feeds into “We need a Constitutional Convention(Con-Con) ASAP”. As I mentioned above, this stuff is waiting in the wings awaiting a super energizing “crisis” such as this.
Why a constitutional amendment enshrining abortion rights is next to impossible
Could the American body politic effectively override the Supreme Court's abortion ruling by amending the Constitution? Almost impossible.
www.yahoo.com
"A constitutional amendment proposal supporting or limiting abortion rights would, like any amendment, require a two-thirds vote of both the US House and US Senate — a much greater threshold than Congress passing a law, which Democrats are also expected to try in an all-but-futile attempt to codify Roe v. Wade for the long term.
If such a constitution amendment proposal somehow passed, three-fourths of state legislatures must then ratify it for the amendment to become law.
From the 1970s through the early 2000s, abortion rights opponents — overwhelmingly Republicans — tried this route. They proposed a series of materially similar constitutional amendment proposals, which all sought to overturn Roe v. Wade. Often dubbed the "Human Life Amendment," none came close to passage out of either the House or Senate.
Alternately, two-thirds of US states could request the nation conduct a constitutional convention — sometimes known as an Article V convention — for the purpose of amending the Constitution. Three-fourths of states would again have to ratify any amendments the convention proposed. There are also fundamental questions about how a constitutional convention might even work, with the Congressional Research Service noting numerous unanswered questions.
Such a convention has never occurred in US history.
The likelihood of one occurring for the purposes of creating a constitutional right to abortion seems as remote today as ever, particularly given that Republicans control a notable majority of state legislative bodies, according to the latest count by the National Conference of State Legislatures.
Despite the odds, some Democrats almost certainly will advocate making the right to an abortion the Constitution's 28th amendment."
The DRs Mike Yeadon (formerly with Pfizer) & Wolfgang Wodarg (called out the WHO in 2009 for faking a pandemic) wrote to the EMA (European Medicines agency) imploring them to halt the vaccine rollout because of concerns that the spike protein in the shots would affect the placenta and also lead to "indefinite infertility". If they were just blowing hot air, there's only one way to find out.....time.Like all your predictions over the years it won’t come true either. By the end of the century is a long ways off and declining birth rates isn’t terrible anyway. A lot less suffering with less births.