So I did some work and showed you direct quotes from the medical examiners.
So you realize if someone gives an opinion on trial and then contradicts themself later, or is contradicted by another expert, that opinion doesn’t stand as absolute, right? You can’t just give one quote and then say that is a fact, that is really stupid
no lmao. If his heart stopped functioning, you have a question of causality. Did chauvins knee cause the heart to stop or did it stop because it was incapable of continuing due to its ill health.
Source? Can you even show a link to an article where I can confirm that? Or is that too much work for you? Funny how Mr. "I've watched every second of the trial" can't even back anything up with a single source.
I would be more willing to do the work you are requesting me to do for you if posts werent composed of insults against me. I dont really enjoy conversing with you so don’t know why I would do a bunch of favours for you
Of course, if someone dies at home with drugs in their system they will rule it an overdose. What the hell else are they going to say, their cat killed them?
it means that the drugs were sufficient to kill him, to be deadly,
Also, 3000 prone position holds is an incredibly small sample size.
youd think if this hold was so deadly and dangerous, there would have been 1 other death in over 3000.
Except that's not what you summarized at all. You are literally all over the map, and trying to make the defense's case for them.
that is what I summarized
Homicide being a medical, not legal term. The medical examiner said that Floyd was essentially medically incapable of surviving the encounter with the police, due to his heart and drug levels, not that he was killed.
floyd was medically incapable of surviving the encounter, as the doctor said. is that murder? If a football player tackles someone and they die of a heart attack, and the tackle wasn’t illegal or negligent, is that murder? It’s the same hypothetical
Since you refuse to show any sources for what you are saying, I have to find my own. And all my sources are painting a bleak picture for Chauvin
i showed you some sources. You want me to walk you through this step by step ? It would be nicer if someone with an informed opinion would comment, not demand me to do it for them
The medical examiners confirmed Floyd did not die from an OD
Thats just not true in the context of their testimonies. The medical examiner wrote on the report that the drugs played a significant role in his death.the other ones admitted they were deadly levels. That’s enough for reasonable doubt.
Use of force-trained police officers testified that the force Chauvin used was excessive
there wasn’t a single police officer that didn’t walk back that statement when questioned, to admit that given the circumstances, what he did was nessessary
inb4 SOURCES NOW, Jesus man if you don’t know what I’m talking about, dont give an opinion