Dangers Of Marijuanas

Lurker

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
3,783
1) you don’t know lisa
No, I don't. But in a hypothetical where I see Person A attacking Person B, I don't need to know Person B's history to come to their defense
You'll learn. LOL
3) it’s more than “know a couple people with autism” - it’s literally my career.
That wasn't my point. My point was that your refutation of the study was based on an anecdote. Even if you're an expert on autism anecdotes aren't "proof" that your argument is the correct one. I say that even while acknowledging I don't even think the study is true.
Career and anecdote don't belong in the same sentence.
4) it is doing a grave disservice to people with autism by perpetuating a bad mother steroetype on their parents with shoddy half assed science, blame the mom blah blah.. it’s a disservice to the whole autism community.
Really? Does the whole autism community come to the VC forums to get the latest hot take on autism?
You're not wrong, it's a disservice to the whole world.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
1) you don’t know lisa
No, I don't. But in a hypothetical where I see Person A attacking Person B, I don't need to know Person B's history to come to their defense
2) Lisa didn’t ask a question
Quoting Lisa: "The true cause of autism?"
3) it’s more than “know a couple people with autism” - it’s literally my career.
That wasn't my point. My point was that your refutation of the study was based on an anecdote. Even if you're an expert on autism anecdotes aren't "proof" that your argument is the correct one. I say that even while acknowledging I don't even think the study is true.
4) it is doing a grave disservice to people with autism by perpetuating a bad mother steroetype on their parents with shoddy half assed science, blame the mom blah blah.. it’s a disservice to the whole autism community.
Really? Does the whole autism community come to the VC forums to get the latest hot take on autism?
1) if you insist on chiming in with your personal opinion about how two people are interacting with each other then yes you should have some background details about those two peoples history and character before doing so. Comments about the subject matter in and of itself is something else.

2) if you knew Lisa you would know that wasn’t an honest question. But you either don’t know her because your new here OR your not new here, you do know her and your only purpose is to take over here usual MO of sowing chaos

3) no, I asked HER a question in an effort to get HER to think. There’s something called face validity. It’s more than an anecdote. If something lacks face validity it typically lacks any other sort of validity. I suggest you google it if you are still confused.

4) does it matter if the whole autism community comes to this forum? Perpetuating a lie against a community is harmful to that community no matter where it’s posted and it isn’t as if this was Lisa’s original idea and she didn’t find it somewhere else and repost it. What is your purpose in being here?
 

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,288
1) you don’t know lisa
You don’t either... :rolleyes:

Sorry to interject here but can I just enquire as to who you are? Are you the defence for the clownage? If not then I'd suggest you have a quick look through this forum so you can see the quality of Lisafers work here at VC forum.

I think this is a reasonable request as not to cause you any type of public embarrassment when you do find out that Lisafer is nothing more than a slightly dysfunctional troll.
I think @Moswen can figure out your character in how you address me...
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
Maybe it should be called the Popcorn Thread?
Maybe when I make a reply to a comment on an issue other people shouldn’t turn it into a petty quabble to begin with. She posted an article and I made a relevant response with a question. Then some poster who joined today came in and derailed the subject to make it into a petty quibble and here we are now.
 

Moswen

Newbie
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
8
Maybe when I make a reply to a comment on an issue other people shouldn’t turn it into a petty quabble to begin with. She posted an article and I made a relevant response with a question. Then some poster who joined today came in and derailed the subject to make it into a petty quibble and here we are now.
I see. You're allowed to share an opinion on something you disagree with, but if someone disagrees with you THAT'S when the thread gets derailed. Very convenient.
 

Lurker

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
3,783
I see. You're allowed to share an opinion on something you disagree with, but if someone disagrees with you THAT'S when the thread gets derailed. Very convenient.
Absolutely not, Jess will entertain thoughts that are against her own when they are presented with a good argument. Lisa does not do that and I suspect you won't either.
 

Moswen

Newbie
Joined
Aug 13, 2020
Messages
8
Absolutely not, Jess will entertain thoughts that are against her own when they are presented with a good argument. Lisa does not do that and I suspect you won't either.
I never had a dog in the fight regarding the validity of the study. What I was arguing against was ganging up on an individual. Everyone in this thread needs access to a good therapist.
 

Lurker

Star
Joined
Mar 14, 2017
Messages
3,783
I never had a dog in the fight regarding the validity of the study. What I was arguing against was ganging up on an individual. Everyone in this thread needs access to a good therapist.
Is it ganging up to call a spade a spade?
 

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,288
Be honest with yourself. You post without reading past the headline.
I read it all. I thought it was interesting enough to post the article. People can make yo their own minds as to the validity of the study. I think it is an interesting development though.
 
Top