No single "gay gene" says researchers

JoChris

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
6,168
Scientists have again debunked the idea of a single "gay gene", in the largest study to date of the genetics of same-sex sexual behaviour....

...Nearly half a million people took part in the study, mostly from the United Kingdom and the United States, which was published in the journal Science today....

...The data used in the study, which was predominantly drawn from the UK Biobank and 23andMe, looked at the male and female participants' DNA and questions they had answered about their sexual behaviour, including whether they'd ever had sex with someone of the same sex....

.... But the five markers identified by the researchers have only a very small effect. Taken together, they contributed to less than 1 per cent of the variation in same-sex sexual behaviour. Looking across the entire genome, all the markers only account for between 8 and 25 per cent of variation....

...It is impossible to predict an individual's sexual behaviour from their genome, said study co-author Ben Neale of the Broad Institute. "Genetics is less than half of this story for sexual behaviour, but it's still a very important contributing factor."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2019-08-30/no-single-gay-gene-study-finds-science/11461114

------
As expected, further down the article there was some concerns expressed about how this research would be used, using guilt trip tactics.

It is very unlikely that this will become widely known/ reported by mainstream COMMERCIAL media.
The LGBTQ+ "I can't help it, I was born this way" propaganda has taken hold of 21st century's society's worldview and they will do their very best to keep us from rejecting their excuses for their lifestyle choices *translation* perversions.
 

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,288
It is very unlikely that this will become widely known/ reported by mainstream COMMERCIAL media.
The LGBTQ+ "I can't help it, I was born this way" propaganda has taken hold of 21st century's society's worldview and they will do their very best to keep us from rejecting their excuses for their lifestyle choices *translation* perversions.
Even it it is many people will think its fake news.
 

Aero

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
5,910
The LGBTQ+ "I can't help it, I was born this way" propaganda has taken hold of 21st century's society's worldview and they will do their very best to keep us from rejecting their excuses for their lifestyle choices *translation* perversions.
This study doesn't disprove being born in a specific way. It simply means there isn't one gene they can locate. People can be born a lot of different ways even without the gene factor.
 

Aero

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
5,910
What do you mean?
I was talking about environmental factors. Like if someone is born with a bad heart, that could be due to a lack of nutrients in utero. Or exposure to some type of virus. Point being, a person can be born abnormal without genetics being at play.

I'm only drawing parallels here, I'm not trying to compare birth defects with homosexuality. I have my own theory as to why people are born gay. Homosexuality appears to be an unconscious archetype. In fact, it's the same archetype that heterosexuals identify with, it's just been flipped around.
 

Aero

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
5,910
O good!

You don’t think that homosexuality is a choice then?
I think that both options can be true. Some people can be born homosexual, and some can make a conscious choice. But I think the conscious type is probably extremely rare.

Nobody makes a choice to be happy, or angry. Or introverted vs extroverted. They just are those things at any given point in time. So the same is probably true for homosexuality.

I should also note, the school of thought I subscribe to considers us all mental. Like consciousness in and of itself is a type of mental sickness. Call it our monkey brains trivial attempt at bridging the gap between conscious and unconscious. I think we would all be way smarter, and get further if we communicated unconsciously.
 

JoChris

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
6,168
This study doesn't disprove being born in a specific way. It simply means there isn't one gene they can locate. People can be born a lot of different ways even without the gene factor.
The genetic markers they have identified are insufficient to explain the numbers of LGBTQ+ people.
They reported the figures in the most flattering way possible.

Repeat from above: ".... But the five markers identified by the researchers have only a very small effect. Taken together, they contributed to less than 1 per cent of the variation in same-sex sexual behaviour. Looking across the entire genome, all the markers only account for between 8 and 25 per cent of variation...."

Look from the opposite perspective: More than 75% - 92% of LGBTQ+ have no cluster of genomes that have been identified as markers that provide the excuses that they were born that way.
 
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
4,046
So in other words homosexuality is something you do and not something you are. Makes sense. However the same community says they can be born in the wrong body and believes that mutilating the body they were born in is becoming more themselves, so it probably won’t matter much to them
 

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,288
I think that both options can be true. Some people can be born homosexual, and some can make a conscious choice. But I think the conscious type is probably extremely rare.

Nobody makes a choice to be happy, or angry. Or introverted vs extroverted. They just are those things at any given point in time. So the same is probably true for homosexuality.

I should also note, the school of thought I subscribe to considers us all mental. Like consciousness in and of itself is a type of mental sickness. Call it our monkey brains trivial attempt at bridging the gap between conscious and unconscious. I think we would all be way smarter, and get further if we communicated unconsciously.
Life is about choices, sometimes you make the wrong choices.
 

Axl888

Established
Joined
Jul 29, 2019
Messages
413
Of course there is no such gene, gender confusion is only in the mind and TPTB (with the help of their lord satan) has since been waging psychological warfare through MSM's and other mediums to normalize this LGBTQ-none sense
 

polymoog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
8,207
Lol if sexuality was passed through genes, all these teens wouldn't suddenly be going gay after having straight ancestors.
clearly, you have no idea beyond mendelian genetics.
better stick to touting the pro-vax line.
 

polymoog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
8,207
I think that both options can be true.
agreed here, but i think it is more like 95% choice/environmental (abuse related) and 5% genetic.

homosexuality has existed for thousands of years. american indians had homosexuals in their tribes.
the only thing new is the fad of homo/multi-sexuality possibly via estrogen-mimicking compounds (BPA, soya, etc.) and possibly the prevalance of child abuse which drives the numbers higher.
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
clearly, you have no idea beyond mendelian genetics.
better stick to touting the pro-vax line.
Alright then educate me on what other types of genetics we are talking about because clearly you are a geneticist. Oh wait you won't because you cuck out everytime someone calls you out
 

manama

Star
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
3,827
Sexuality is a preference, while your preference isn't 100% choice based its not inherited either. Environment has more to do with it than just having a "gay gene".

Not just that but people forget that sexuality isn't just limited to gay and straight. Asexuality or especially bisexuality's existence does enough to kill these arguments before they even begin.
 

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,288
I think that both options can be true. Some people can be born homosexual, and some can make a conscious choice. But I think the conscious type is probably extremely rare.

Nobody makes a choice to be happy, or angry. Or introverted vs extroverted. They just are those things at any given point in time. So the same is probably true for homosexuality.

I should also note, the school of thought I subscribe to considers us all mental. Like consciousness in and of itself is a type of mental sickness. Call it our monkey brains trivial attempt at bridging the gap between conscious and unconscious. I think we would all be way smarter, and get further if we communicated unconsciously.
When homosexuality goes against nature, it has to be a choice. Those other things you suggest introverts/extroverts, happy/sad are all natural and is like comparing apples and oranges. The natural way is heterosexuality not homosexuality. Homosexuality has always been considered perverse which is why it was underground until people’s minds could be changed otherwise. It must be very satisfying for some people that the entertainment industry was so successful at changing people’s perception of homosexuality.

How does one communicate unconsciously?
 

polymoog

Superstar
Joined
Jun 17, 2017
Messages
8,207
Alright then educate me on what other types of genetics we are talking about because clearly you are a geneticist. Oh wait you won't because you cuck out everytime someone calls you out
since you prodded me into discussing it, yes, i went to school for genetic engineering. the difference between you and me is i broke out of the scientific brainwashing they feed us in the lecture halls while you still accept what they say as gospel.
not all genetic traits are in the classical 9:3:3:1 ratio. its more complicated than that. look it up yourself.
 
Top