Yes, they did. That's why we don't have all those shootings, which is exactly my point.I thought Europeans voluntarily gave up their guns? Except for the Swiss or is it the Austrians? I can’t remember which ones make their citizens have them.
We've traded gun violence with other forms of violence but Europe has had a Breivik. Thankfully we have healthcare instead of guns or Europe would be far worse than America with all the things that occured during the last 10 years. MKUltra wouldn't be necessary at all.Yes, they did. That's why we don't have all those shootings, which is exactly my point.
Well articulated post. I shudder to think about the implications of what you're describing when Drumph says we need "reforms to our mental health laws." I understand the situation of a mental health crisis needs attention but when the establishment is behind organizing laws and funding... egad. So what, conspiracy theorists will eventually be labeled as mentally ill? If you question the official narrative the white coats show up and drag you off?Defence contractors cashing in: ArmorMe
ArmorMe Bulletproof Backpacks, Developed by Israeli Security Experts, Offer Increased Safety for Students
https://www.prnewswire.com/il/news-releases/armorme-bulletproof-backpacks-developed-by-israeli-security-experts-offer-increased-safety-for-students-300896259.html
https://www.algemeiner.com/2019/02/27/israeli-company-markets-bulletproof-backpacks-and-will-donate-proceeds-to-school-safety-activists/
___________
"Watts wants Congress to make domestic terrorism a federal crime (suspected domestic terrorists now typically face gun, conspiracy, or hate-crime charges) and to pass a law for designating domestic terrorism organizations and domestic terrorists (the State Department does this for international terrorists and terrorist groups). He’s also proposed that the FBI director launch a national domestic-terrorism case for “white-nationalist-inspired terrorism,” which would “help the FBI dedicate more resources and personnel to white-nationalist terrorism, may help them detect violent plots earlier, and increase the amount of information for sharing with state and local partners who may be better informed and positioned for thwarting extremist violence.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/08/how-can-fbi-fight-far-right-extremism-ideology/595435/
Ummm…….I think I now finally understand the real goal that these mass shootings (of which the US somehow maintains a monopoly) are supposed to achieve for TPTB. While disarmament may be part of it, the other goal is to quell every form of dissent by classifying every dissenting behavior as terrorism. I don’t think it was a coincidence that a few days ago this made news:
Yahoo News reports that the FBI “for the first time has identified fringe conspiracy theories as a domestic terrorist threat.”
Or Obama comparing these mass shooters to ISIS.
And now one of the shootings is classified as “domestic terrorism” and everyone is talking about this “new” menace. I think that they want everyone to get very comfortable with the term and what it entails. Everyone knows what “international terrorism” called for: dhs, legal surveillance, etc. Therefore, in tossing around the term, it is expected that everyone think about what is to be demanded of them inorder to be kept safe from domestic terrorists/next-door neighbor and the question is: what are you prepared to give up in exchange for security? Protection from yourself and others. This furthers atomization of the society. If a conspiracy theorist is a terrorist, it translates into the idea that you are a threat not only to yourself but also to others and the threat has to be neutralized somehow.
The demonization of the Arab/colored was never the ultimate but rather used to segue into the white terrorist. While it was difficult, after 9/11, to portray whites as terrorists in movies and tv shows, there were afew that did otherwise.
9/11 called for mass surveillance, legally that is. This calls for massive roll-out of pre-crime apparatus to protect you from yourself and others.
Bush: "terrorists hate our freedoms"
"The ultimate goal, and one that we are rapidly approaching, is the destruction of all social bonds and the obliteration of any remaining sense of community— the complete atomization of society."
But people still get killed in Europe? That didn’t end did it?Yes, they did. That's why we don't have all those shootings, which is exactly my point.
That was already taken care of….7yrs agoWell articulated post. I shudder to think about the implications of what you're describing when Drumph says we need "reforms to our mental health laws." I understand the situation of a mental health crisis needs attention but when the establishment is behind organizing laws and funding... egad. So what, conspiracy theorists will eventually be labeled as mentally ill? If you question the official narrative the white coats show up and drag you off?
Yeah but Walmart does have a security apparatus. They probably pay an astronomical amount for "loss prevention". It's just that all that means is crunching numbers and occasionally checking a security camera. Point being, they can allocate some of those funds toward proactive measures.Apparantly the guys manifesto was also anti corporations.. so Walmart makes sense.
They won’t even pay cashiers so I doubt they are going to pay for security. The Walmart by where I used to live has a town cop assigned to it 24:7
If they cared about people’s lives they would. They won’t because despite all that money on security the only thing they care about securing is their money/revenue.Yeah but Walmart does have a security apparatus. They probably pay an astronomical amount for "loss prevention". It's just that all that means is crunching numbers and occasionally checking a security camera. Point being, they can allocate some of those funds toward proactive measures.
Agreed and it's ironic because Walmart is still a victim of tons of theft. Of course, I use the term victim loosely. I tend to think of it more as a cause and effect type of deal. Or Karma.If they cared about people’s lives they would. They won’t because despite all that money on security the only thing they care about securing is their money/revenue.
They lose money in merchandise using those stupid self checkouts but they save way more by automating peoples jobs away so it’s a win for them. One freaking cashier on a Sunday afternoon in a store with 30 checkout lanes. And they pay THAT cashier absolute slave wages when they could afford to pay way more.
No, I won’t kill you because I’ve made my peace with your position. Iam not picky with sources because iam capable of seeing through what iam being sold. Is the news manipulated? Ofcourse it is. Nevertheless I read and watch news everyday and that is why I said in another thread that iam not of the opinion that the tv should be thrown out. Some of my musings/conclusions i post on here come to me while iam literally watching “news” on my television. Infact, I came to the conclusions in my first post in this thread after watching all these terrorism experts being interviewed in a news segment. Personally, every source is important, however flawed. Even Noam Chomsky, in an interview on the 30th (??) Anniversary of the release of his book “Manufactured Consent” (about msm manipulation), was asked what news site he reads first thing every morning and he replied: The New York Times.I know you are going to kill me for saying this, but there is nothing I would trust less than MSM and Vice articles on white nationalism in that most are designed to create outrage. In short, the news is manipulated to no end when it comes to opinion. So you think Trump may have ordered false flags as opposed to the left or deep state doing the same thing for gun control? Also, with this being a conspiracy site, we do remember the controversies put forth by the likes of William Cooper on McVeigh. Maybe I am missing a point or something, so feel free to explain for I just did not seem to follow your point.
Another thing here. Did someone order the Ohio shooting to be a left-wing fanatic? If so, why? How do the two tie together for we cannot really talk about one incident and not the other. You see, most living in America do not see the same gap of division that is on the news as we go to work and play.
I have no doubt that control is the central issue here, but I think we all just have speculation at best.