My agenda? What would that look like?
A white Christian Europe only. You might not admit it but deep down that's what you want.
Can you quit the straw man, please? I understand you're going after my moral integrity since I called you out on your immoral view, but you're being irrational. I defended the ME based on moral principles, ie. the non-aggression principle and the right to self-determination. If you don't like that I apply the same to the actions and beliefs of other peoples and civilisations, then that's your problem.
Takes a jab at me and then when the jab is returned in kind you call out "foul". Sorry, that's not how it works.
There's also the aspect of empathy. This guilt complex among western people has manifested due to the feminisation of society and the accompanying increase of empathy. Not intrinsically a bad thing, but it's an explanation why western people participate more in collective self-criticism of failing to reach the standards they expect to achieve. People who empathise and self-criticise too much in the face of others who do not return the empathy are destined to lose. Moreover, people who empathise too much with other people are most vulnerable for exploitation and this is exactly what's happening. Other peoples with less to no empathy and self-criticism are exploiting the guilt complex of the more empathic peoples and are doing it in order to extract resources. It's a one-way stream and all groups are queuing up to hit that white guilt button like an ATM to get their handouts. It's one of the lowest, disrespectful and greediest forms of leeching and I literally despise anyone who participates in it.
I can agree with this. Would you say there needs to be a balance between masculinity and femininity within society in order for it to flourish? Or does there need to be a little more of one than the other?
Yet you still didn't mention any accomplishment. What values and what aspects of our lost culture?
Why are you so intent on me mentioning an accomplishment of the West when I've already stated that there have been many accomplishments by the West?
Modesty, good manners, being kind to your parents and taking care of them in their old age, acting your age, and etc. Instead we have pornography, alcoholism, drugs addicts, gambling addicts, promiscuity, celebrities, single parent homes, and etc.
I specifically said "not because of immigration alone", but immigration is the major factor that will make the change irreversible. Moral relativism is at the basis of decadence and the destruction of spiritual unity, but if we can reverse this and spread more philosophy and Christianity to people we could possibly restore what we've lost. But when you replace the people with a different philosophy and world view that does contain a universal moral code and is spiritually more united, that reversal becomes very unlikely.
Sorry to break it to you but with immigration or no immigration the Europe of old that you admire so much is gone just as the Muslim world of old which I admire is gone as well.
What research have you done to believe it is all propaganda?
Well it seems like all these "r*pe" cases come from the Alt-Right. That seems a little suspicious to me. No other media-outlet seems to be reporting on it and if it's such a big issue it would make it to at least one news outlet.
Didn't know it was that simple. I'll change my signature into "I Love Muslims" so we can finally argue the actual points without being distracted by emotions towards racism.
You don't need to lie so please don't put that in your signature. You should probably go more towards "I want a white only Europe".
I'm gonna need you to clear up the vagueness. What are you comparing? What do you mean with "in terms of modernity"'? What did the whites do that the Africans and Arabs did but on a larger scale?
The way the world looks now and what's happening in it is a direct result mostly from the actions of Europe and America through the acts of Colonialism and then Imperialism followed by the two World Wars. Conflict and wars. When it comes to those two whites take the cake on that one.
They controlled territories through expansion in which Arabs and other Semites lived and used Arabs as pawns and collateral damage in their conflicts with Rome.
Most Jews are integrated. They are almost everywhere on television and radio with most people being clueless that they're Jewish. If you're talking about the orthodox Jews, they are entitled to live as they wish since we live in a secular society with freedom of religion. They are not becoming such a large part of the population that our society is turning Jewish. Neither do these Jews want our society to become Jewish since Jewishness is an ethno-religious elitarian identity that they are not keen on sharing. If you're going to continue with false equivalence, just let it drop. Take a plane to Luton, Malmö or Molenbeek and check it out for yourself, since you're clearly arguing from a place of ignorance.
Okay, but my point still stands which is that white Europeans are hypocrites. They want Muslims to integrate but say nothing to the Jews that have their own police, laws, and customs within a EUROPEAN country. Muslims living in England don't care about others converting to Islam they just want to live their lives without all the hypocrisy. The only person arguing from a place of ignorance is yourself. You fail to see the plain hypocrisy within white European communities. Jews have their own country within white European nations and get nothing said to them while Muslims can't even wear what they want without being told that they have to integrate or get out. It's a very simple issue yet you're dancing around it trying to make it more complicated than it really is.
It is not that simple. You're not taking into account that this migration into the West is desired by Soros-like individuals and organisations and politicians go along with the current because of this toxic age of political correctness, voter gaining and the welfare state which expands the reach of government. The replacement of the native populations of Europe is
designed and coming to fruition as we speak.
From the godfather of the European Union:
"The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. [...]
Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe's feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation."
Practical Idealism, Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, 1925
Would you say that they bomb to smithereens Arab lands and the lands they don't bomb they destabilize through proxy wars and governments, all in order to give Arabs no choice but to immigrate which then the elite give them access into Europe? This would allow Israel to easily conquer the lands they want and at the same time destabilize Europe?
Right now the Red Cross is picking up migrants in Libya by plane. They used to be transferred with one of the many NGO ferry services in the Mediterranean, until both the Italian and Libyan governments accused those NGOs of human trafficking. They were caught exchanging equipment with actual smugglers, but anyone with half a brain already knew that they were at least facilitating human trafficking. And I'm not sure if you're really trying to understand my point. I've said on numerous occasions that this migration wave is largely not organic, but organised, with the specific purpose to replace the native population and further dechristianise western civilisation. Am I not explaining it well?
This would not have been possible if NATO didn't bomb them to smithereens. Refer to my reply to the above and we'll move from there depending on what your thoughts are on that.
If you want me to ignore that question you wouldn't have posted it. And again, it's not about accepting scholarly peer reviewed works, but about facts. There are scholarly peer reviewed works that contradict each other. If you can't bring up facts than just admit that. If you can, show them instead of complaining about me not accepting your theories.
Here are the facts. A black man with a similar history and record serves longer jail sentences for the exact same crime than a white man. That's racism plain and simple. I've shown this already and you had nothing to say a while back on the previous iteration of these forums. There's simply too much information and hence an abundant amount of peer reviewed articles that state this. We can go through the gymnastics again where I provide the facts and you'll either ignore it or say it's false without giving a proper reason as to why. Here:
"
Black male offenders continued to receive longer sentences than similarly situated White male offenders."
"Violence in an offender’s criminal history does not appear to account for any of the demographic differences in sentencing."
https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/demographic-differences-sentencing
Is the US Sentencing Commission also looking for a handout in all of this white guilt business and therefore not accept their findings?
That's not how it works. They are estimates based on casualties and displacements of peoples. They're not gonna take polls in jihadi territory.
Estimates is right. The whole region is a war zone so please don't throw me surveys in a region where people are dying, looking for food, and running away from bombs as if they were some kind of legitimate findings. As of now the only thing we know about the ME is that it's a cluster of a mess that has been bombed to death by America and it's allies.
Say it as it is then. I can tell that you think I'm a racist, since you even think rainerann is a racist, but truth be told, if I was a neutral and objective newcomer to this forum, void of indoctrination, I'd single you out as the biggest racist in this thread. You will defend any position that accuses whites (not ideology or phenomena) but the actual white race and deflect any negative commentary that is directed to non-white ideologies or trends. And I don't care what people think racism is, they've raped that word sideways that it has lost all meaning.
Rainerann is definitely a racist but that's because she isn't too bright and exposes herself in fits of annoyance or anger. With you it's a little different but I'm not going to get into it now. Denying facts about black people getting longer sentences for the exact same crime while their history and records are similar is pretty suspect to me. You seem to go to any lengths in trying to show that racism doesn't exist within the West when there have been overwhelming data and peer reviewed research to go contrary to your view.
Trying to deflect and label me as the racist won't help your cause. Of course, the likely racist would try to turn it around and label me as the racist. The majority of America (which is white) supported the Iraq invasion according to Gallop so am I wrong in saying that the majority of white people in America are responsible for the death of innocent Arabs based off of complete lies?
A likely racist saying that the word "racism" has lost all meaning is predictable don't you think?