U.s. Launches Missiles At Syrian Base After Chemical Weapons Attack

[Lisa]

Watch for Damascus…someday it will no longer be a city.

 

[manama]

This is getting out of control Syrian people are attacked by their own shitty government and then US hops in, in a war to supposedly end this but we all know US is going to make it worse like it has always done like in iraq and afghanistan. And then they will be the good guys in war against "terror" but since US is idk retarded because in the war against terror only innocent civilians have died till now.
This war got out of hand in the first place because US has to play daddy everywhere

 

[Thunderian]

Assad has killed tons of his own people, so gassing them wouldn't be out of the realm. What is surprising is the US response, and the pointlessness of it. Why bother?

 

[Armas]

Interesting videos that might shed light on the matter:

 

[Thunderian]

Paul Joseph Watson does a good job of voicing my thoughts on this.

 

[TruthSucker]

Whether or not Assad did some gas attacks to his own people, this should be investigated by (really) independent sources.
But who cares: he's a jerk, Trump is captain america. Let's bomb the hell out of this arabian jihadists! Yeeehaaaaaaaaa!!!
There may be some sarcasm in the text above.

How many air strikes of the anti-isis-coalition went "wrong" in the last months? How many civilians got killed by other forces then the syrian? And by what law? Anyway, god bless america. It's disgusting. And my country isn't much better right now, don't get me wrong.

Taking a look at the world map ...
Afghanistan: check
Irak: check
Syria: won't take long
Pakistan: (drone-) check

So what's next ... hmmmmm. The truth maybe somewhere in the middle.
I can't eat as much as I wanna throw up.

 

[KoncreteMind]

"But... but.. . but.. Trump is AGAINST the Globalists!!"

So much for that.. Unless Assad WANTED US involvement in Syria, I doubt he'd be stupid enough to gas his own people, especially at a time like this.

 

[Aero]

I'm interested in hearing some supportive statements, describing why people think Assad wouldn't strike the Rebels. And because it would be stupid isn't good reasoning The Country has been in war for like 7 years. Isn't it better reasoning that after so many years of war a leader would decide to take the kid gloves off? I mean do we really think Assad was the slightest bit worried about U.S involvement?

Maybe the Syrians have been laughing at us over Obamas tough talk, and no action.

 

[KoncreteMind]

I'm interested in hearing some supportive statements, describing why people think Assad wouldn't strike the Rebels. And because it would be stupid isn't good reasoning The Country has been in war for like 7 years. Isn't it better reasoning that after so many years of war a leader would decide to take the kid gloves off? I mean do we really think Assad was the slightest bit worried about U.S involvement?

Maybe the Syrians have been laughing at us over Obamas tough talk, and no action.

Gassing whole cities full of civilians just to get the "bad guys"? Giving the US the ground they wanted to justify attacking Syria? Im not going to act as if Im up to par when it comes to whats going on in Syria, but would he have for actually doing this?

And thats with ignoring the fact that the rebels he's up against, have been supported by the US....

 

[Aero]

Gassing whole cities full of civilians just to get the "bad guys"? Giving the US the ground they wanted to justify attacking Syria? Im not going to act as if Im up to par when it comes to whats going on in Syria, but would he have for actually doing this?

And thats with ignoring the fact that the rebels he's up against, have been supported by the US....

That's what people do in war. Yeah you bomb Military targets, but when you want the other side to submit. You bomb the civilians.

 

[Thunderian]

"But... but.. . but.. Trump is AGAINST the Globalists!!"

So much for that.. Unless Assad WANTED US involvement in Syria, I doubt he'd be stupid enough to gas his own people, especially at a time like this.

I tend to agree, and I am willing to change my mind about Trump. Mind you, this is the only thing I know of so far that has been so out of character with his previous statements, so I guess we'll see.

This ENTIRE thing stinks, though. From the "gassing", to the bombing, to everything.

 

[Aero]

Yeah I mean the videos I saw of the gas attacked looked pretty horrible. It was strange though how everyone had cameras at the right time. To me that is one of the hallmarks of an Mk Ultra style hit. And every government has an Mk ultra program. But the U.S is best at it, so either way it's probably all our fault.

 

[KoncreteMind]

That's what people do in war. Yeah you bomb Military targets, but when you want the other side to submit. You bomb the civilians.

The US at one time or another (heck, maybe even now) supporting the rebels means nothing in this? If Assad knows that they supported the rebels, what benefit would it REALLY be to gas these rebels and his own people? I really cant see a benefit to him doing so but of course that doesnt mean he didnt do it. But the US backing the rebels at one time or another, and their quick use of the bombs, leads me to believe that it was most likely the rebels that did the gassing...

I tend to agree, and I am willing to change my mind about Trump. Mind you, this is the only thing I know of so far that has been so out of character with his previous statements, so I guess we'll see.

This ENTIRE thing stinks, though. From the "gassing", to the bombing, to everything.

I honestly dont know why anyone fell for the hook line and sinker no matter what side of the spectrum (from conservative to liberal) they lie on. Time and time again, those in power show themselves willing to say whatever it is to get them into office, then do opposite once inside. I know you dont view Israel as the big bad wolf that I and some others do, but his support of blind unwavering support of Israel (like all other presidents) didnt cause you to be suspicious even a little? If it wasnt for that, and my belief that no one gets into office without being allowed to, it would have seemed to me like Trump was against the NWO with all the out in the open hate he was getting...

 

[Lisa]

Paul Joseph Watson does a good job of voicing my thoughts on this.

He's starting to sound like drama king-Alex when he does his reports.

 

[Thunderian]

I honestly dont know why anyone fell for the hook line and sinker no matter what side of the spectrum (from conservative to liberal) they lie on. Time and time again, those in power show themselves willing to say whatever it is to get them into office, then do opposite once inside.

If not really liking the guy but agreeing with a lot of what he said is "hook, line and sinker", then I guess I'm guilty, but the truth is I was never a MAGA maniac and any support I had for Trump was always more about keeping Hillary out of the oval office at all costs. If Hitler had been running against Hillary, I would have supported his election rather than hers.

And he didn't just say the right things -- he did the right things. As I said, and as far as I know, this is the first thing he has done that is out of step with what he has been saying and doing up until now, and I am not the only one who is surprised.

I know you dont view Israel as the big bad wolf that I and some others do, but his support of blind unwavering support of Israel (like all other presidents) didnt cause you to be suspicious even a little?

What do you mean by blind, unwavering support? Not condemning everything Israel does?

Why would not hating the only free and open democracy in the Middle East make me suspicious of him? I don't view Israel as a big bad wolf because there is no reason to. Despite what your Facebook feed is telling you, Israel is not any worse than any other country, and lot better than most. There are more Arab citizens of Israel, with all the rights and freedoms that Jews have, than there are Jews in all Arab countries, combined.

And if you think a Jew in Tehran or Damascus has anything like the freedom an Arab in Tel Aviv has, you are reading too much Electronic Intifada again. Heck, not even Arabs in Arab countries have the rights Arabs in Israel have.

Also, do you know anything at all about Obama's relationship with the Israelis, and the actions he took that damaged them? You really don't know what you're talking about, if you really believe that all US presidents have blindly supported Israel.

 

[Aero]

The US at one time or another (heck, maybe even now) supporting the rebels means nothing in this? If Assad knows that they supported the rebels, what benefit would it REALLY be to gas these rebels and his own people? I really cant see a benefit to him doing so but of course that doesnt mean he didnt do it. But the US backing the rebels at one time or another, and their quick use of the bombs, leads me to believe that it was most likely the rebels that did the gassing...

Depends. The Rebels have been getting crushed since the end of Obama's last term. I feel like everyone in the world knows U.S involvement isn't going to do much at the moment. And if all they had to do was throw some sarin gas out there and America would step in, they would of done it. A lot I imagine.

 

[SunnyK]

Sure, if he is. Question is: why would he do that? What would be achieved aside from giving a green light for US invasion? There is no purpose of sh****ng in own nest.

Basically in the Middle East there are numerous tribes fighting for power and Assad is a dictator. These tribes are basically fighting him for power. But he is not a good guy he has flown numerous barrel bombs over the people in Syria. Syria is not at all like America, it's like a land of lawless savages.

 

[KoncreteMind]

If not really liking the guy but agreeing with a lot of what he said is "hook, line and sinker", then I guess I'm guilty, but the truth is I was never a MAGA maniac and any support I had for Trump was always more about keeping Hillary out of the oval office at all costs. If Hitler had been running against Hillary, I would have supported his election rather than hers.

And he didn't just say the right things -- he did the right things. As I said, and as far as I know, this is the first thing he has done that is out of step with what he has been saying and doing up until now, and I am not the only one who is surprised.

Its just on a conspiracy site, I didnt personally understand why people reverted to thinking that the population actually "elects" the president. But maybe my mistake was assuming that people went with the belief that theres a shadow group controlling things such as politics and media. So I wasnt specifically speaking about you, but since you did have some type of support for him, I guess it does fit. Do you disagree that those in power control the elections? And correct me if Im wrong, but didnt you support him BEFORE he got elected? So there wasnt much he could DO while campaigning to show he was about what he was saying.

What do you mean by blind, unwavering support? Not condemning everything Israel does?

Why would not hating the only free and open democracy in the Middle East make me suspicious of him? I don't view Israel as a big bad wolf because there is no reason to. Despite what your Facebook feed is telling you, Israel is not any worse than any other country, and lot better than most. There are more Arab citizens of Israel, with all the rights and freedoms that Jews have, than there are Jews in all Arab countries, combined.

And if you think a Jew in Tehran or Damascus has anything like the freedom an Arab in Tel Aviv has, you are reading too much Electronic Intifada again. Heck, not even Arabs in Arab countries have the rights Arabs in Israel have.

Also, do you know anything at all about Obama's relationship with the Israelis, and the actions he took that damaged them? You really don't know what you're talking about, if you really believe that all US presidents have blindly supported Israel.

Im talking about his pro Israel stance. Or his "we need to cut spending but not from the aid to Israel" stance. I think you ignore the fact that the bankers had a great deal to do with the state of Israel existing, but my point wasnt the quality of life there but moreso his support of Israel like every other puppet president. One would think if he was anti establishment, that he'd be against the grain when it came to Israel too...

 

[KoncreteMind]

Depends. The Rebels have been getting crushed since the end of Obama's last term. I feel like everyone in the world knows U.S involvement isn't going to do much at the moment. And if all they had to do was throw some sarin gas out there and America would step in, they would of done it. A lot I imagine.

So the rebels being supported by the same group that did the bombing isnt relevant in your opinion? Because to me, it seems like business as usual. Support the rebellion, get the authority out of office, then install a puppet leader in their place. Happened to Libya, whats so different here?

As well, Russia/China seem to be keeping their eyes on the US's involvement from my perspective though like I said, I havent been paying the greatest attention to whats going on there..

 

[Aero]

So the rebels being supported by the same group that did the bombing isnt relevant in your opinion? Because to me, it seems like business as usual. Support the rebellion, get the authority out of office, then install a puppet leader in their place. Happened to Libya, whats so different here?

As well, Russia/China seem to be keeping their eyes on the US's involvement from my perspective though like I said, I havent been paying the greatest attention to whats going on there..

I don't understand your first question. I don't think the Rebels false flagged themselves. That would kind of be like ISIS bombing themselves to try to drum up more hatred for America. Pointless. And nothing is irrelevant. I just consider the possibility Assad is a terrible leader and brought it upon himself