He is another cult founder. Blending multiple faiths together to support his own worldview. He is yet another pawn of Satan being moved on the chessboard to create the One World Religion forecast in the Book of Revelation.“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” ―Arthur Schopenhauer
http://jahtruth.net/truth.htm
Who is JAH? :- http://jahtruth.net/mal4.htm
Thanks for replying. See for me, everything is deliberately written the way it is. it is no coincidence.Ok @AspiringSoul let's try...
I am writing exams this Wednesday, and I have been wanting to make a thread exposing the RCC for what she truly is, but this is a really long post and I cannot now spend 3 hours typing everything up as I just do not have the time. So bear with me please, I will give you an answer after my exams...
The atheists' pope. Genuine Catholics don't like him.Ah! The pope seems like a nice guy.
Well, good thing I'm not a genuine Catholic.The atheists' pope. Genuine Catholics don't like him.
Loves talking out of both sides of his mouth. Hasn't changed any doctrines though. Actions speak louder than words. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/19/living/pope-said-what/index.html
The previous pope looked like Darth Sidious so I always thought it was all an act and the penny would drop, but then he just vanished..maybe he was a good one?Ah! The pope seems like a nice guy.
it would help if they didnt misquoteThe atheists' pope. Genuine Catholics don't like him.
Loves talking out of both sides of his mouth. Hasn't changed any doctrines though. Actions speak louder than words. http://edition.cnn.com/2015/01/19/living/pope-said-what/index.html
He said that? I like him even more! (deep down he knows there's something more important than belief in God)it would help if they didnt misquote
We must meet one another doing good," the pope said. To those who say: " 'But I don't believe, Father, I am an atheist!' " the pope said, "But do good: We will meet one another there."
So, was the pope saying that people can go to heaven, even if they don't believe in God?
Probably not, say church experts.
meeting them there isn't literal, like a place in heaven
it just means agreeing on at least one thing ie doing good.
the way he tackled the topic of atheism isn't bad at all, or homosexuality.
you really desperately try to demonise others who you have a bias against don't you?
It would be good to see what Quentin Tarantino could do with a movie featuring this actor as the Pope!reading back my lengthy posts, maaan, so many spelling/grammatical errors but ive been really busy and tired over the weekend so can barely remember most of it.
I'm way too harsh in my posts.
still
i fucking love this
0:14
Ok.Fair enough.
One question and we'll leave it alone. Do you believe that Christ is God, incarnate?
P.S. Consider that John, who spent much time with Jesus, also wrote:Fair enough.
One question and we'll leave it alone. Do you believe that Christ is God, incarnate?
Agreed. Likewise.Can I tell you something?
in the middle ages, muslim alims didn't have 1 particular interpretation of the Quran.
it was common for someone to have multiple interpretations....some even had as many as 20 different interpretations and by that i mean for each single verse
why would they do that?
it was about being open to understanding something from multiple perspectives
the when, what, why, how, if, but, could have, should have, perhaps, if not, if then
they had knowledge of metaphysics (inc numerology, astrology), psychology.
back then, such men would not even write down their interpretations because they felt shame to potentially get it so wrong.
however for what WAS written in texts, you only have to look at examples like the lost libraries of timbuktu, im talking treasure troves of information....beyond comprehension
in this particular case and many more like it, african people actively buried or destroyed their material because white men wanted it...and much of it was confiscated.
we're sat here posting some stuff on a forum, you're linking us to websites
BUT
i swear to you, most of what ive ever learnt was learnt through careful reading of texts from the middle ages esp sufi material, but it extends to hindu, jewish, christian knowledge too.
Much of this knowledge was made available in the modern era through translations.
We're very lucky to live in the age of information.
Still, what we actually are doing is interpreting translated interpretations
do you get this?
For me, I believe in the Quran but the Quran tells me to believe in the Torah, Psalms and Gospel. so I accept that and don't care what people have to say.
i accept that there is a lot i don't know, so it's better to accept the basic outlines and then attempt to understand the rest according to those outlines
Understood. That is better than most can say, but have you ever read the book of Enoch, please? Because there is a prophecy in it, that says that people would write things down incorrectly, but that once God's Word was all written down CORRECTLY, then everything in the Books would concur. It is at this link in case you become interested.many muslims here say the bible is altered/corrupt
i don't because that contradicts the Quran
many say christians follow a pauline doctrine and not Jesus
I don't because that too potentially contradicts the Quran
Understood. However, there is also this in the Qur'an:many of the arguments ive put out on here revolved around these topics.
the reason why i won't read what you tell me to is because what little i read was a load of shite
for example 'if you pray in the mosque, you're a kafir'
the guy who wrote that has a screw loose.
P.S. I'm not saying that you should do something I say. Like you, I know there is a lot I still don't know. These posts are however about sharing this information so that it may be considered, but that is up to everyone that reads. To choose to do, or not do for themselves.9:107. And there are those who put up mosques (etc.), by way of mischief and BETRAYAL - to disunite the Believers - and in preparation for one who warred against "I AM" (Revelation 12:7) and His Messenger aforetime. They will indeed swear that their intention is nothing but good; but "I AM" doth declare that they are certainly LIARS.
9:108. Never stand thou forth therein. There is a Temple (House of God - Kaba - on Mt. Moriah) whose foundation was laid from the first day on piety; it is more worthy of the standing forth (for prayer) therein. In it are men who love to be purified; and "I AM" loveth those who make themselves pure.
9:109. Which then is best? - he that layeth his foundation on piety (a Rock - Matthew 7:24-27) to "I AM" and His Good Pleasure? - or he that layeth his foundation on an undermined sand-cliff ready to crumble to pieces? And it doth crumble to pieces with him, into the fire of Hell. And "I AM" guideth not people that do wrong (if they are doing wrong Satan is guiding them).
9:110. The foundation of those who so build is never free from suspicion and shakiness in their hearts, until their hearts are cut to pieces. And "I AM" is All- Knowing, Wise.
JAH - Muad'dib.
http://jahtruth.net/nomos.htm
Exactly! Any and all angels will not permit you to worship them, the only exception is fallen angels - they want to be worshipped...View attachment 2031 Just one thing is still bothering me...
I wonder why "Michael" doesn't rebuke people from worshiping him, as the angel in Revelation does to John?
I have not been here on this forum before.lmao
this guy used to be on here before with the
'when michael stands up' stuff
The terms "No disrespect" preceded almost immediately by "lmao" actually could be considered an indication of a contradiction in terms, if perhaps you failed to notice.No disrespect bro but your views are lacking in any metaphysical clarity
Thank you for sharing how you see this.The logos IS eternal.
The way i understand this theme is like this
The existence of a thing, is only real if there is an awareness of it. So it stands to reason for the universe to be real, there is a universal awareness.
My existence had a beginning, yet I have existed in the awareness of God forever.
Therefore it should also stand to reason that in actuality I am also eternal. There never was a time, the universal awareness wasn't aware of me.
There's nothing I have or will ever do the awareness didn't already know, eternally.
Therefore in reality ALL things are eternal.
This 'all things' element is precisely what the Logos is supposed to be ie the universal consciousness.
However the process of the creation of time and our individual existence, this is a perception of ours, something we're made to experience.
From the universal eternal perspective it is just an illusion. It is the infinite manifesting itself.
The logos is the infinite ocean and we are the drops in that experience.
we represent the expansion of consciousness as the microcosmic consciousness.
that is a very basic explanation of reality.
And you know this how, please?angels are just part of that process ie they are drops
Michael is actually a seraph, their naturei s fire and they are tied with the realm of malakut which came into being.
Correct.the angels were not higher than Jesus Christ.
Far out.Ok.
I believe:
Christ is Prince Michael (The Archangel).
Christ (the Spirit-Being) was sent by God, and incarnated into the human body, that was called Jesus (which means Saviour) thereby making the human+Being, called Jesus+Christ.
http://thewayhomeorfacethefire.net
John 14:27 Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.
14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come [again] unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
John 20:17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and [to] my God, and your God.
Christ is identified as Prince Michael, The Archangel (first of the chief of the princes of God):
Daniel 10:13 But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, the first of the chief princes [of God], came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia.
10:21 But I will show thee that which is noted in the Scripture of Truth: and [there is] NONE that holdeth with me in these things, EXCEPT Michael your prince (Eno. 67:1; Rev. 5:3; 5; 9 & 12:7).
Matthew 19:16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have Eternal Life?
19:17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou ME good? [there is] none good but One, [that is], God: but if thou wilt enter into Life, keep the Commandments.
19:18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness (tell lies),
19:19 Honour thy father and [thy] mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Christ was sent to rule over us, by God.
John 5:22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
5:23 That all [men] should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.
Christ (Prince Michael) therefore has the authority of God (Judge) over us, because Father (God) sent him (His Eldest Son) and gave this to him (Christ).
So then, was Christ "God" incarnate? I believe it depends on exactly how you are defining the word "God". "God" over us - as in Judge? In that case, yes most definitely.
But he did not say he is The Father.
He said he is The Son (Christ).
Christ made a point of it, to tell us that His Father (God) is greater than he (Christ) is. (Allahu Akbar)
He said this out loud, so that we could hear/read it (and John could write down) and that Father is not only our God, but Father is also his God.
John 20:17 Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and [to] my God, and your God.
So, that is how I believe to understand it. Christ and Father are one; just as They would like all of us to be, too.
John 17:17 Sanctify them through Thy Truth: Thy Word is Truth.
17:18 As Thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world.
17:19 And for their sakes I sanctify myself, that they also might be sanctified through the Truth.
17:20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe me through their word;
17:21 That they all may be one; as Thou, Father, [art] in me, and I in Thee, that they also may be one in Us: that the world may believe that Thou hast sent me.
17:22 And the glory which Thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as We are One:
17:23 I in them, and Thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one; and that the world may know that Thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as Thou hast loved me.
17:24 Father, I will that they also, whom Thou hast given me, be with me where I am; that they may behold my Glory, which Thou hast given me: for Thou lovedst me BEFORE the foundation of the world.
John 5:23 That all [men] should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.View attachment 2031 Just one thing is still bothering me...
I wonder why "Michael" doesn't rebuke people from worshiping him, as the angel in Revelation does to John?