There are just 2 categories here. Reasons for believing the msn narrative (It was an assassination attempt. Reasons against.
Reasons against. (It may help if you read these really quickly like in a James Corbetty type of way).
Perp had no motive
Perp wasn't a trained marksman, in fact, he was not very good at shooting a gun.
Security services looked the other way whilst Perp scoped the area with drones and range finders.
"Catastrophic" breakdown of security services which rendered them unable to spot a security threat or prevent the security threat from being an assassin.
People predicting what was gonna happen before it happened.
After assassination attempt, Perp shot dead. Scene cleared up. Nothing to see here.
Msn give out more than one identity of Perp initially before settling on a single one.
Only footage of incident available on social media has been edited and pre screened.
"Sniper" who allegedly took out Perp seemed to think he was a better shot if his gun was moving.
Perp had acting experience in old Blackrock ad.
Msn runs the story everywhere for 36 hours then memory holes it and drops it like a hot stone.
Opposing political party doesn't seem to be able to find any of the above anomalies to use to politically to expose a fraud or deceit.
New censorship purge begins on social media cancelling anybody exposing the fraud or questioning the official narrative.
Crowd appears to have an unusually high number of crisis actors, wranglers and security personnel on a day off.
Demeanour, mood and political fortunes of intended victim seem to improve considerably immediately after being shot.
......there is plenty more but we'll stop there for now.
Reasons for.
It said on all the news programmes and all the papers.
If anybody can help me with buffing out the reasons for section I'd be very grateful.
time.com
