Aeneid
But what are the alternatives to democracy?
Open dictatorships (e.g. Augusto Pinochet), group dictatorships (e.g. 20th century Russian/ Chinese Communism), or religious tyranny nations e.g. Iraq.
Where do refugees of all types want to go to: non-democratic nations or democractic nations?
No system is universally suitable for everyone. Each nation must, in time, settle upon it's own form of government.
Voltaire compares a republic to a dragon with many heads and many tails. "The many heads hurt each other, and the many tails obey a single head which wants to devour everything." This is what President George Washington warned about in his farewell address. Donald Trump has already made a colossal mistake with his nepotism. It will only get worse from here on out.
Nazism was never meant to be an export article. In it are preached lofty ideals that are peculiar to the German character. Hitler had read Aristotle, he was familiar with the golden mean. He considered himself a realist. He expected a Nazi renaissance in Germany, not in Britain, France, America, etc. This ongoing American Alt-Right appropriation of Nazism is contributing to the destruction of it's teachings.
History furnishes us with two prominent examples of ideals gone off the rails: Socrates and Jesus. The core of Jesus' teachings can be found in the Sermon on the Mount. What is taught there would most certainly not have been given off to everyone. It would be "casting pearls before the swine", a betrayal of his own principles. He had a seventy and a twelve. It's a symbolic number for his inner circle. Paul destroyed Jesus' teachings by adapting it for his superstitious hearers (Jews) and by spreading his own private interpretation of it to the Gentiles, who evidently had no interest in it (Acts 17:32). Didn't Jesus himself say he was sent only to the Jews (Matt. 15:24)?
Now a word on the belief of the Gentiles:
The Christian concept of heaven/hell is a literalization and distortion of the Elysian fields and Hades. These ancient Greek concepts signified a rational form of the reward/punishment system, as well as a rational reincarnation (not like the Hindus). Those who had cultivated the arts, music, philosophy, all sorts of ennobling crafts would be afforded the opportunity to cultivate them even further after they lost their physical body while those who were invested in material and sensuous pleasures would be utterly deprived of them, hence weeping and gnashing of teeth. Once these wretches had come to realize their mistake, they would be allowed to reincarnate back into this world. The two sources for my interpretation are Ovid's Metamorphoses and Virgil's Aeneid:
"I delight in journeying
among the distant stars: I delight in leaving
earth and its dull spaces, to ride the clouds; to
stand on the shoulders of mighty Atlas, looking
down from far off on men"
"Each spirit suffers its own: then we are sent
through wide Elysium, and we few stay in the joyous fields,
for a length of days, till the cycle of time,
complete, removes the hardened stain, and leaves
pure ethereal thought, and the brightness of natural air."