After 3 years I think it's still difficult to tell "who is who" in the alt-covid community. There are many different camps that have disagreed since the start of the pandemic. There are debates on the theory of virus' themselves or if sarscov2 exists as an identifiable material. Some have focused on 5G and other environmental poisoning, while other are investigating the injections as the real bio-weapon, etc. In general there are so many perspectives that the term "controlled opposition" has become overused, more by those who want to ignore or silence different opinions.
Following the lead of Ryan Christian and TLAV channel I'm been taking everything in stride. I think all the material is worth considering no matter the source. The recent Project Veritas video is odd but they've done good work in the past exposing fraudulence. What was admitted by the Pfizer employee isn't even that shocking (that they're experimenting with gain of function processes) so I'm not understanding the extreme reaction that "It's all staged!". I personally like McCullough, a renowned cardiologist who is absolutely exposing the harm of the vaccine and, like Malone, thinks now that all vax administration should be stopped. Like you said Vanden Bossche, with his complicated theories on immunology, still is basically saying the injections were never a proper public health policy. That said it was cool to read the criticism of VB's thesis Frank posted from Rosemary Frei.
Definitely the discussion between viewpoints can only make us sharper. At the end of the day we synthesize information to make the best choices for our health and the health of our families. As much as we may seem to be in opposition I think there's a general consensus in the way we're all suspicious of everything we're told. As Christian says every show, we have to come to our own conclusions.
off-guardian.org
off-guardian.org
www.bitchute.com
www.ibtimes.com
rumble.com
michaelpsenger.substack.com
healthimpactnews.com
www.newsweek.com
usawatchdog.com
www.activistpost.com
