The British Royals

redqueen

redqueen

Superstar
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
6,034
i thought she died when they were using that
hologram for her jubilee,We here were all thinking
she'd be gone by yrs end

I can't believe We're already Seeing that "the queen is
dead,long live the king" crap also wondering what the
king and his queen consort will be doing now that they're
the ones wearing the crown

considering In common law,the queen and king are the same
legal person because the crown is what is known as a corporation
sole,strange wording eh means that, in official capacity, the
legal personality of the queen/king does not change when
different natural persons hold the position.

any legal documents and instruments issued in the name of
the queen or that mention the queen will apply and be understood
to be from the king,which means the queen could rule from
the grave really by the wording being used

are the Peoples gonna accept charles and his consort idk
no ones really ever liked him eh specially after he treated
and far as most believe murdered Diana

is this why the vatican is calling in all assets,moving all
funds to the vatican bank/vaults for oct1
strange for sure somethings up
 
P

PeninsulaDweller

Established
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
101
And someone on this thread was defending British Israelism saying that the Queen would be dethroned and shamed and I don't know what else. Let's see how adherents of that theory shift their script so that this event fits into it.
 
D

Doomsday Cult Mom

Veteran
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
830
redqueen said:
i thought she died when they were using that
hologram for her jubilee,We here were all thinking
she'd be gone by yrs end

I can't believe We're already Seeing that "the queen is
dead,long live the king" crap also wondering what the
king and his queen consort will be doing now that they're
the ones wearing the crown

considering In common law,the queen and king are the same
legal person because the crown is what is known as a corporation
sole,strange wording eh means that, in official capacity, the
legal personality of the queen/king does not change when
different natural persons hold the position.

any legal documents and instruments issued in the name of
the queen or that mention the queen will apply and be understood
to be from the king,which means the queen could rule from
the grave really by the wording being used

are the Peoples gonna accept charles and his consort idk
no ones really ever liked him eh specially after he treated
and far as most believe murdered Diana

is this why the vatican is calling in all assets,moving all
funds to the vatican bank/vaults for oct1
strange for sure somethings up
Click to expand...
Poor Canadians have to look at her picture everyday on money ?
 
A Freeman

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
6,886
Lurking009 said:
Still standing behind the nostradamus & jahtruth 'prophecy'?*

*And no, dying of old age is not 'dethroning'.
Click to expand...
Still standing behind Scripture...

Ezekiel 21:25-27
21:25 And thou, profane wicked prince of Israel, whose day is come, when inequity [shall have] an end,
21:26 Thus saith the Lord "I AM"; Remove the diadem (sovereignty), and take off the crown: this [shall] not [be] the same: exalt [him that is] low (Line of Zarah), and abase [him that is] high (Line of Pharez).
21:27 I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it: and it shall be no [more], [overturned] UNTIL he come whose Right it is; and I will give it [him - Shiloh (Gen. 49:10)].

Luke 1:31-33
1:31 And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS (Saviour).
1:32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of The Highest: and the Lord God his Father shall give unto him the Throne of David:
1:33 And he shall reign over the "House of Jacob/Israel" for ever; and of his Kingdom there shall be no end.

...and waiting to see what Father will reveal, when He chooses to reveal it.
 
L

Lurking009

Veteran
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
638
A Freeman said:
Still standing behind Scripture...

Ezekiel 21:25-27
21:25 And thou, profane wicked prince of Israel, whose day is come, when inequity [shall have] an end,
21:26 Thus saith the Lord "I AM"; Remove the diadem (sovereignty), and take off the crown: this [shall] not [be] the same: exalt [him that is] low (Line of Zarah), and abase [him that is] high (Line of Pharez).
21:27 I will overturn, overturn, overturn, it: and it shall be no [more], [overturned] UNTIL he come whose Right it is; and I will give it [him - Shiloh (Gen. 49:10)].

Luke 1:31-33
1:31 And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS (Saviour).
1:32 He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of The Highest: and the Lord God his Father shall give unto him the Throne of David:
1:33 And he shall reign over the "House of Jacob/Israel" for ever; and of his Kingdom there shall be no end.

...and waiting to see what Father will reveal, when He chooses to reveal it.
Click to expand...
Scripture didn't fail, though. False prophets, Biblical misinterpretations, and false teachings failed. I hope you will consider that when a prophecy fails, it's the sure sign of a false prophet.
 
Last edited:
D

Doomsday Cult Mom

Veteran
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
830
I read somewhere that the Queen had only 477 millions when she died? The Evil Ones steal that much from us everyday and send it to Ukraine. Even scumbags like the Kardashian family and Jay-Z and Beyonce have more than that. Hunter probably smoked that much in crack not counting ten percent for the big guy.
 
T

ToxicFemininitySucks

Star
Joined
Jun 26, 2022
Messages
2,264
Has any one read this book?

The book, called Mummies, Cannibals and Vampires, will be published on June 29 (2016) by Routledge and charts the largely forgotten history of European corpse medicine from the Renaissance to the Victorians.

www.goodreads.com

Mummies, Cannibals and Vampires

Mummies, Cannibals and Vampires charts in vivid detail the largely forgotten history of European corpse medicine, when kings, ladies, gen...
www.goodreads.com

www.dailymail.co.uk

British royalty dined on human flesh (but don't worry it was 300 years ago)

It will come as quite a surprise to Prince William's new wife, but some of his royal ancestors such as Charles II (pictured) once dined on human flesh, according to a new book.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
They have long been famed for their love of lavish banquets and rich recipes. But what is less well known is that the British royals also had a taste for human flesh.

A new book on medicinal cannibalism has revealed that possibly as recently as the end of the 18th century British royalty swallowed parts of the human body.

The author adds that this was not a practice reserved for monarchs but was widespread among the well-to-do in Europe.

Even as they denounced the barbaric cannibals of the New World, they applied, drank, or wore powdered Egyptian mummy, human fat, flesh, bone, blood, brains and skin.

Moss taken from the skulls of dead soldiers was even used as a cure for nosebleeds, according to Dr Richard Sugg at Durham University.

Dr Sugg said: 'The human body has been widely used as a therapeutic agent with the most popular treatments involving flesh, bone or blood.

The history of medicinal cannibalism, Dr Sugg argues, raised a number of important social questions.

He said: 'Medicinal cannibalism used the formidable weight of European science, publishing, trade networks and educated theory.

'Whilst corpse medicine has sometimes been presented as a medieval therapy, it was at its height during the social and scientific revolutions of early-modern Britain.

'It survived well into the 18th century, and amongst the poor it lingered stubbornly on into the time of Queen Victoria.

'Quite apart from the question of cannibalism, the sourcing of body parts now looks highly unethical to us.

'In the heyday of medicinal cannibalism bodies or bones were routinely taken from Egyptian tombs and European graveyards. Not only that, but some way into the eighteenth century one of the biggest imports from Ireland into Britain was human skulls.

'Whether or not all this was worse than the modern black market in human organs is difficult to say.'

The book gives numerous vivid, often disturbing examples of the practice, ranging from the execution scaffolds of Germany and Scandinavia, through the courts and laboratories of Italy, France and Britain, to the battlefields of Holland and Ireland and on to the tribal man-eating of the Americas.

A painting showing the 1649 execution of Charles I showed people mopping up the king's blood with handkerchiefs.

Dr Sugg said: 'This was used to treat the "king's evil" - a complaint more usually cured by the touch of living monarchs.

'Over in continental Europe, where the axe fell routinely on the necks of criminals, blood was the medicine of choice for many epileptics.

'In Denmark the young Hans Christian Andersen saw parents getting their sick child to drink blood at the scaffold. So popular was this treatment that hangmen routinely had their assistants catch the blood in cups as it spurted from the necks of dying felons.

'Occasionally a patient might shortcut this system. At one early sixteenth-century execution in Germany, 'a vagrant grabbed the beheaded body "before it had fallen, and drank the blood from him..".'

The last recorded instance of this practice in Germany fell in 1865.

Whilst James I had refused to take human skull, his grandson Charles II liked the idea so much that he bought the recipe. Having paid perhaps £6,000 for this, he often distilled human skull himself in his private laboratory.

Dr Sugg said: 'Accordingly known before long as "the King's Drops", this fluid remedy was used against epilepsy, convulsions, diseases of the head, and often as an emergency treatment for the dying.

'It was the very first thing which Charles reached for on February 2 1685, at the start of his last illness, and was administered not only on his deathbed, but on that of Queen Mary in 1698.'

Dr Sugg's research will be featured in a forthcoming Channel 4 documentary with Tony Robinson in which they reconstruct versions of older cannibalistic medicines with the help of pigs' brains, blood and skull.

The book, called Mummies, Cannibals and Vampires, will be published on June 29 by Routledge and charts the largely forgotten history of European corpse medicine from the Renaissance to the Victorians.
Click to expand...
I haven't read it, but going by the description and the article it seems they're admitting it, but it's ok because it was "medicinal".
 
A Freeman

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
6,886
Lurking009 said:
Scripture didn't fail, though.
Click to expand...
Agreed. And neither will that particular scriptural prophesy, which has yet to be fulfilled.

Lurking009 said:
False prophets, Biblical misinterpretations, and false teachings failed. I hope you will consider that when a prophecy fails, it's the sure sign of a false prophet.
Click to expand...
Thank-you. And agreed about false prophets, Biblical misinterpretations and false teachings, which will always fail.

Hopefully you will consider that one of our inherent faults on this planet is our rush to judgment, despite being Commanded NOT to do that (Matt. 7:1-4). Everything that is currently hidden shall be revealed before the end (Luke 12:2), and that includes everything involved in this particular situation.

There is absolutely no doubt that the British throne is the Throne of David, nor is there any doubt that God Himself will give that throne to Christ. There is likewise no doubt whatsoever that the 458 lb purplish, porphyry REAL Stone of Destiny, which was taken from Westminster Abbey on 25 December 1950, was NOT the stone used during the coronation ceremony on 2 June 1953.

Instead, that fraudulent coronation ceremony knowingly used the 336 lb yellowish, Perthshire sandstone fake left in Arbroath Abbey in April of 1951. The same fake that was then sent back to Scotland in 1996 and has been sitting under lights and behind glass in Edinburgh Castle. The same fake stone that will likely now have to be fetched for the next fake coronation ceremony, if there ever is another ceremony.

You perhaps have not considered that this is precisely the time and precisely the exact sequence of events required to finally expose the fake nature of the fake 336 lb stone to the British people and the public at large who, for the most part, have ignored this irrefutable evidence for the past 70 years.

And once the fake stone is exposed, and the fact that fake stone was used during Elizabeth's fraudulent coronation on 2 June 1953, her fake rule as the fake monarch will likewise be exposed for all to see, effectively removing her from the historical records of real monarchs that preceded her, as God already did when He had the real Stone of Destiny removed from Westminster Abbey on Christ-mas day in 1950. And the same will hold true for Charles or William or anyone else that may very briefly pretend to be the monarch, and intentionally try to use (or try to avoid using to keep from exposing themselves) that fake stone again.

It's understandable that pointing out possible Scriptural connections within the prophecies of Nostradamus (or messages in film, or anything from extra-Biblical sources), can and will be used by unbelievers as a means of persecuting God's Messengers. That is exactly what has happened with every single Prophet of God and with Christ too, when He was here in the body of Jesus 2000 years ago. That same false judgment is actually what sent Him to the cross. Why should it be any different now?

On the JAHTruth.net/diana web-page, concerning the likely murder of Diane by Elizabeth via the special services, JAH stated the following about Nostradamus:

Psalm 89:34-36
89:34 My Covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips.
89:35 Once have I sworn by My holiness that I will not lie unto David.
89:36 His seed shall endure for ever, and his throne as "the sun" before me.

The British Empire has been in its worst decline throughout the fraudulent reign of Elizabeth, which has darkened the British throne exactly as prophesied.

So instead of making hasty assumptions and judgments, would it not be wiser to wait and see exactly how all of this unfolds?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top