A Freeman
Superstar
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2019
- Messages
- 8,329
Can you see Christ in his second coming? He has already cast his net | VT Foreign Policy
www.veteranstoday.com
Because the Rapture isn’t his return.First, there is no biblical evidence for a seven-year period of tribulation following Jesus’ return to Earth.
Catholics do think of themselves as Christians but a lot of their beliefs stem from paganism and are not biblical or Christian at all. Some of their beliefs and practices are sadly also in most Christian religions. For example Sunday worship is not biblical or Christian but most Christians go to church on Sunday instead of the true Sabbath which is Saturday. Also celebrations of Christmas and Easter are all from Catholicism (which were pagan festivals) but now most Christians celebrate them too. As Christians we are meant to do only what God asks of us not man-made traditions. So that's the difference between true Christianity and false Christianity. I have forums on these subjects here, here, here and here.Firstly i apologise for my ignorence but this seems the right place to ask the question
Catholicism/vatican has been linked to paedophilia and satanic practices this is just ehat i have read not by any means to offend anyone but catholics believe in christ and christians believe in christ what are the main differences?
And again apologies for not knowing this but jesus was persecuted by the romans were these then roman catholic? Pagan? What was the religion of the romans and ponsious pilot at the time, as they call jesus king of the jews then when he came as new prophet some jews became christ followers christians
But where was catholicism what is the difference please could someone tell me
No one who believes in the Rapture calls it a “secret” Rapture. I’m not sure where the term came from, but it’s not part of the doctrine. You’re posting complete straw man arguments based on lies about what people like me believe.Four reasons for rejecting the idea of a secret rapture
A careful study of the Bible suggests at least four major reasons for rejecting the view of a two-stage second coming of Christ:
1. The vocabulary of the Second Advent offers no support for such a view. None of the three Greek terms used in the New Testament to describe the return of Christ namely, parousia, coming; apokalypsis, revelation; and epiphaneia, appearing suggest a secret rapture prior to the Tribulation (often called the pretribulation rapture ) as the object of the Christian's Advent hope.
Pretribulationists claim that in 1 Thessalonians 4:15, Paul used the word parousia to describe the secret rapture. But in 1 Thessalonians 3:13, he used the same word to describe the coming of our Lord Jesus with all His saints a description, according to pretribulationists, of the second phase of Christ's return. In 2 Thessalonians 2:8, Paul again employs the term parousia to refer to the coming of Christ that will cause the destruction of the antichrist an event that, according to pretribulationists, is supposed to happen during the second phase of Christ's coming (see also Matthew 24:27, 38-39). Similarly, the words apokalypsis and epiphaneia are used to describe both what pretribulationists call the rapture (1 Corinthians 1:7; 1 Timothy 6:14) and what they call the return or second phase of Christ s coming (2 Thessalonians 1:7, 8; 2:8). So, the vocabulary of the Blessed Hope provides no basis whatsoever for a two-phase distinction of Christ's return. Its terms are used interchangeably to describe a single, indivisible, posttribulational Advent of Christ that will bring salvation to believers and retribution to unbelievers.
2. The New Testament contains no trace of a secret, invisible, instantaneous rapture of the church. In fact, 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17, which gives the most famous description of the Second Advent, suggests the very opposite. It speaks of the Lord descending from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first, and together with the living saints, they will be caught up (raptured) to meet the Lord in the air (verses 16, 17).
The command, the trumpet call, and the great gathering of living and resurrected saints hardly suggest a secret, invisible, and instantaneous event. On the contrary, as has often been pointed out, this is perhaps the noisiest passage in the Bible. The references to a trumpet call in the parallel passages of Matthew 24:31 and 1 Corinthians 15:52 corroborate the public nature of the Second Advent. No trace of a secret rapture can be found in any of these passages.
3. The Bible's Tribulation passages offer no support for a pretribulation rapture of the church. In His Olivet discourse, Jesus spoke of the great Tribulation that will immediately precede His coming, promising that for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened (Matthew 24:22). To argue that the elect are only Jewish believers and not members of the church is to ignore the fact that Christ was addressing His apostles, who represent not only national Israel but also the church at large. This is confirmed by the fact that both Mark and Luke, who wrote their Gospels for the Gentile church, report the same discourse (Mark 13:20; Luke 21).
Noteworthy also is the striking similarity between Christ's description of the second coming of Christ in Matthew 24:30-31 and Paul's in 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17. Both passages mention the descent of the Lord, the sounding of the trumpet, the accompanying angels or archangel, and the gathering of God's people. Yet, pretribulationists say the 1 Thessalonians passage describes the rapture prior to the Tribulation, but the passage in Matthew describes Christ's second coming after the Tribulation. However, the parallel nature between the two passages clearly indicates they describe a single event not two. So, the rapture of the church does not precede but, on the contrary, follows the great Tribulation.
4. Lastly, both Paul and the book of Revelation negate the notion of a secret pretribulation rapture. In 2 Thessalonians 2, Paul refuted a misconception that was prevalent among the Thessalonian Christians. Apparently, they believed that the day of the Lord had already come. To refute this misconception, Paul cited two major events that must occur before the coming of the Lord namely, the rebellion and the appearance of the man of lawlessness who will persecute God s people (2 Thessalonians 2:3). If Paul had expected the church to be raptured away from this world before the Tribulation caused by the appearance of the antichrist, he would hardly have taught that believers would see the appearance of the antichrist before the coming of the Lord.
The book of Revelation treats the events associated with the great Tribulation in greater detail than any other book of the New Testament, events such as the appearance of a beast power that persecutes the saints of God and the pouring out of the seven last plagues (Revelation 8:13). Though John describes these Tribulation events in great detail, he never suggests a pretribulation secret coming of Christ to rapture the church away. This is all the more surprising in view of John's s express purpose to instruct the churches regarding final events. In fact, John explicitly mentions a countless multitude of believers who will pass through the great Tribulation: "These are they who have come out of the great tribulation; they have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb" (Revelation 7:14).
Pretribulationists argue that these believers are all of the Jewish race, allegedly because, during the events described in Revelation 4:1-9, the church is no longer on earth but in heaven. This reasoning is discredited, first of all, by the fact that nowhere does John differentiate between Jewish and Gentile Tribulation saints. To the contrary, John explicitly states that the victorious Tribulation believers come from every nation, tribe, people and language (Revelation 7:9). This phrase occurs repeatedly in Revelation to designate not the Jews exclusively but every member of the human family, regardless of their ethnic or national origin (Revelation 5:9; 10:11; 13:7; 14:6). Obviously, Christ has ransomed not only Jews but people of every race.
In Revelation 22:16, Jesus claims to have sent His angel to John with a testimony that Revelation contains for the churches. It is difficult to see how the messages the angel gave to John could be a testimony for the churches if the church is not directly involved in the events described in chapters 4:1-9 in other words, in most of the book.
The fact is that Revelation describes the church as suffering persecution by satanic powers during the final Tribulation but not as suffering divine wrath. As the ancient Israelites enjoyed God's protection during the ten plagues (Exodus 11:7), so God's people will be protected when His divine wrath falls upon the wicked. Revelation represents this divine protection by an angel sealing the servants of God on their foreheads so they may be protected when God's wrath falls upon the impenitent (Revelation 7:3; 9:4). Ultimately, God's people will be rescued by the glorious return of Christ (Revelation 16:15; 19:1-11). Revelation, then, portrays not a pretribulation rapture of the church but a single, posttribulational return of Christ.
In light of the reasons discussed here, we conclude that the popular teaching of a secret coming of Christ to rapture the church before the final Tribulation is devoid of any biblical support. Such a belief makes God guilty of giving preferential treatment to the church by removing it from the earth while leaving believing Jews to suffer the final Tribulation.
Scripture, however, teaches that Christ's second coming is a single event that occurs after the great Tribulation and will be experienced by believers of all ages and all races. This is the Blessed Hope that unites every nation, tribe, language and people (Revelation 14:6).
Belated rapture
How soon, according to pretribulationists, is the mass disappearance of millions of true Christians from every nation supposed to occur? Many believe that this event is imminent because its main preconditions namely, the re-establishment of the State of Israel and the repossession of ancient Jerusalem have already taken place.
According to Hal Lindsey's initial calculations in The Late Great Planet Earth, the secret rapture of the church is already overdue. In 1970, he predicted that within forty years or so of 1948, all these things could take place. Lindsey derived the forty years from the biblical duration of a generation. He argued on the basis of the parable of the fig tree (Matthew 24:32-33) that the formation of the State of Israel in 1948 marked the beginning of the last generation (Daniel 9:27) that would see first the rapture, then the seven years of tribulation, and finally, the return of Christ in glory. Since Lindsey and the majority of the pretribulationists believe the rapture will take place seven years before Christ's visible return in glory, it should have occurred by 1981 or 1982. So, time has already run out on this sensational prediction.
Link.
Unless you accept that Jesus Christ is Lord, you will certainly get that chance.I know I'd want to stay and face down the Apoc like a man.
Unless you accept that Jesus Christ is Lord, you will certainly get that chance.