COVID-19, DOCTORS SPEAK OUT, W.H.O./GREAT RESET/4IR, 5G, DIGITAL ID, VACCINE, FOOD SUPPLY, TRACKING & TRACING...

A Freeman

Superstar
Joined
Nov 11, 2019
Messages
8,373
Something perhaps worth clarifying for those who may be new to reading this thread:

You will notice "likes" being shared for posts made here which chronicle the lies, crimes and oppression which are being intentionally perpetrated by the corporate governments, corporate big pharma (medical, chemical and pharmaceutical industries) and the corporate apparatus for delivering the propaganda to sell all this nonsense to the public (the corporate mainstream media).

These "likes" are NOT an endorsement of the lies, crimes and oppression; the "likes" are merely a simple way of saying "thank-you" to those who are diligently searching for the truth and sharing that truth with others, to expose the lies, and the crimes and oppression that lies always cause.

"A well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,157
Something perhaps worth clarifying for those who may be new to reading this thread:

You will notice "likes" being shared for posts made here which chronicle the lies, crimes and oppression which are being intentionally perpetrated by the corporate governments, corporate big pharma (medical, chemical and pharmaceutical industries) and the corporate apparatus for delivering the propaganda to sell all this nonsense to the public (the corporate mainstream media).

These "likes" are NOT an endorsement of the lies, crimes and oppression; the "likes" are merely a simple way of saying "thank-you" to those who are diligently searching for the truth and sharing that truth with others, to expose the lies, and the crimes and oppression that lies always cause.

"A well-informed citizenry is the best defense against tyranny." -- Thomas Jefferson
Hadn't really thought about that, but know that you mention it...
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,157

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,157
Screenshot_2020-08-27 COVID-19, LOCKDOWN, DOCTORS SPEAK OUT, NEW WORLD ORDER THE GREAT RESET, ...png
The PCR "test" isn't a test; it's a tool. And now that tool is being used to perpetuate this FAKE problem, that has invoked a MISINFORMED reaction so that the gullible public begs the parasitic criminal class for their PLANNED solution: get rid of over 90% of the useless eaters and make outright slaves out of those who remain.
Yes, you are correct and I'm very aware of this. I was responding to the article regarding the part that says - Steve Kelly shows the sequence “CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT” which is an 18-character primer sequence found in the WHO coronavirus PCR testing protocol document. It is also common to all the DNA of all humans, whether healthy or sick.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Messages
1,387
CONFIRMED: China Launched a Massive Social Media Campaign in March to Get Countries to Adopt Stringent Coronavirus Lockdowns and Destroy Their Economies – exactly what David Icke has been saying from the start


This is huge. The gateway pundit article has more details on the New York Times expose and the Tweets:

 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,157
Forensic Doctor Destroys Media Lies: 'Nobody Died of Covid in Hamburg without Previous illnesses’
Read Full Article:
Püschel slammed German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s irresponsible and alarmist propaganda towards the coronavirus:

“I think it’s really completely inappropriate when a president tells his people that we are at war, or when the German chancellor compares the situation with the last world war.”

“No killer virus”
Healthy people should not be afraid of infection: “The fear that this is a killer virus and that many will die from it is completely exaggerated,” said Püschel.

“We have to make it clear that we don’t want to be in a glass case. We can’t protect ourselves from everything. And this virus is a comparatively low risk.” The virus is also by no means a death sentence for the elderly and sick. “Most will survive the disease there,” said Püschel.
https://rairfoundation.com/renowned-forensic-doctor-destroys-media-killer-virus-lies-nobody-has-died-of-covid-19-in-hamburg-without-previous-illness-watch/
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,157
Scrubbed from Internet: History of Gates Foundation Sterilizing Hundreds of Thousands of Young Girls in India with HPV Vaccine

Did the Gates Foundation Actually Sterilize Hundreds of Thousands of Young Girls in India?
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,157
The Average American Thinks 30 Million People Died From Coronavirus in the US
They may be “off” when it comes to the enforcement efforts, but when it comes to understanding the actual case and mortality rates, they are WAY off.
For example, when polled they said they believed that nearly 9% of the U.S. population, or 30 million people, have died from COVID-19.
Coronavirus Myths Facts Fb

In reality, at the time the source video was done, the death count was at 155,000. They also overestimated the number of cases by a factor of 20.

In Britain, people thought 5 million people had died from it when in fact fewer than 50,000 had died.

The ignorance of the real truths “are nothing short of stunning,” according to Franklin Templeton, who conducted a similar study for Franklin Templeton-Gallup.

For example, Americans believe people aged 44 and younger account for about 30% of total deaths; the actual figure is 2.7%.
By Dr. Joseph Mercola, the author of Fat for Fuel: A Revolutionary Diet to Combat Cancer, Boost Brain Power, and Increase Your Energy

From the author: The existing medical establishment is responsible for killing and permanently injuring millions of Americans, but the surging numbers of visitors to Mercola.com since I began the site in 1997 – we are now routinely among the top 10 health sites on the Internet – convinces me that you, too, are fed up with their deception. You want practical health solutions without the hype, and that’s what I offer.
References:

YouTube August 7, 2020
Wirepoints August 19, 2020
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,157
COVID-19 Fails Koch’s Postulates, Hence It Cannot Be Proven Scientifically

German scientist Robert Koch (Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch, 1843-1910) made great contributions to the field of microbiology. He is considered to be one of the founders of the field of modern bacteriology. He identified the specific causative agents of TB (tuberculosis), cholera and anthrax.

For his work on TB, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1905 in Physiology or Medicine. Koch established 4 criteria to identify the causative agent of a particular disease.
These criteria have become a gold standard for determining the existence of an infectious agent and for isolating and verifiying what is causing a disease. The criteria are a set of conditions known as Koch’s postulates.
Covid 19 Fails Koch's Postulates

They are:

  1. The microorganism must be identified in all individuals affected by the disease, but not in healthy individuals.
  2. The microorganism can be isolated from the diseased individual and grown in culture.
  3. When introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured microorganism must cause disease.
  4. The microorganism must then be re-isolated from the experimental host, and found to be identical to the original microorganism.
Firstly, the coronavirus SARS-CoV2 (allegedly causing the disease COVID-19) has not been shown to be present only in sick people, but also in the healthy ones. There are countless cases of people having this virus with mild, minor or zero symptoms.
Recently Iceland tested a relatively large percentage of its population (around 5,000 people out of 364,000) and found that 0.86% (close to 1%) of Icelanders had the coronavirus. The symptoms? Little or none:
“Importantly, approximately half of the people who tested positive for COVID-19 are non-symptomatic, according to Gudnason as reported by BuzzFeed. The other half is mostly showing “very moderate cold-like symptoms.””

Secondly, the virus has never been isolated – which must be done with proper equipment such as electron microscopes and which cannot be achieved through CT scans (as the Chinese were using) and the flawed PCR test (more on this below).
The January 24th 2020 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine entitled A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 describes how the scientists arrived at the idea of COVID-19: they took lung fluid samples and extracted RNA from them using the PCR test. It admits that the coronavirus failed Koch’s postulates:
“Further development of accurate and rapid methods to identify unknown respiratory pathogens is still needed … our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates.”

This means that COVID-19 cannot be prove scientifically. Which raises the very important question: is it a made-up virus?
Are RNA Samples and a Genetic Sequence Proof of a New Coronavirus?
David Crowe doesn’t believe there is even sufficient evidence to justify calling this a new virus, let alone a pandemic.
In his paper Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory, he writes:
“The world is suffering from a massive delusion based on the belief that a test for RNA is a test for a deadly new virus … If the virus exists, then it should be possible to purify viral particles. From these particles RNA can be extracted and should match the RNA used in this test.
“Until this is done it is possible that the RNA comes from another source, which could be the cells of the patient, bacteria, fungi, etc. There might be an association with elevated levels of this RNA and illness, but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus. Without purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted that an RNA test is proof that a virus is present.
“Definitions of important diseases are surprisingly loose, perhaps embarrassingly so. A couple of symptoms, maybe contact with a previous patient, and a test of unknown accuracy, is all you often need. While the definition of SARS, an earlier coronavirus panic, was self-limiting, the definition of the new coronavirus disease is open-ended, allowing the imaginary epidemic to grow.
“Putting aside the existence of the virus, if the coronavirus test has a problem with false positives (as all biological tests do) then testing an uninfected population will produce only false-positive tests, and the definition of the disease will allow the epidemic to go on forever.
“This strange new disease, officially named COVID-19, has none of its own symptoms. Fever and cough, previously blamed on uncountable viruses and bacteria, as well as environmental contaminants, are most common, as well as abnormal lung images, despite those being found in healthy people.”


He concludes:
“The coronavirus panic is just that, an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test, that has never been connected to a virus. And which won’t be connected to a virus unless the virus is purified. Furthermore, even if the test can detect a novel virus the presence of a virus is not proof that it is the cause of the severe symptoms that some people who test positive experience (but not all who test positive).
“Finally, even if the test can detect a virus, and it is dangerous, we do not know what the rate of false positives is. And even a 1% false positive rate could produce 100,000 false positive results just in a city the size of Wuhan and could mean that a significant fraction of the positive test results being found are false positives.
“The use of powerful drugs because doctors are convinced that they have a particularly potent virus on their hands, especially in older people, with pre-existing health conditions, is likely to lead to many deaths. As with SARS.
“There is very little science happening. There is a rush to explain everything that is happening in a way that does not question the viral paradigm, does not question the meaningfulness of test results, and that promotes the use of untested antiviral drugs.”

Yes, anti-viral drugs (which do a lot of damage to your body), and, more to the point, mandatory vaccinations.

Fake Tests for a Fake Pandemic?
Insiders and whistleblowers such as the one in the article Insider Exposes COVID-19 Coronavirus Scam have revealed how there are coronavirus test kits being distributed which don’t even test for the specific SARS-CoV2 strain! They just test for generic coronavirus (coronavirus is defined as the “common cold” in medical encyclopedias) which of course will produce more false positive (as the NWO agenda dictates).

Meanwhile, the Medical Industry relies on the PCR test which I have exposed in other articles as wholly inadequate. The PCR Test is a surrogate test since it doesn’t actually isolate the virus. The founder of the PCR test Kary Mullins has admitted that you can’t use PCR “to prove infectious etiology or to diagnose an infectious disease.”

Besides, you can manipulate the results PCR will yield by choosing how many cycles (amplifications) to run. For some diseases, if you lower the number of cycles to 35, it can make everyone appear negative, while if you increase them to above 35, it can make everyone appear positive.

We All Have Viruses, All The Time, as Part of our Virome and Immune System
The human body is composed of 6 trillion cells, 60 trillion bacteria and 380 trillion viruses. Just as we have a microbiome of friendly bacteria which forms the basis of our immune system and 2nd brain in our gut, so too do we have a virome (a collection and community of viruses) which play a role in our healing.
Through the ascendency of germ theory over host theory/terrain theory, the mainstream paradigm now teaches that viruses are “bad guys”, infectious agents “out there”, who can invade the body – thus reinforcing the need for Big Pharma drugs and vaccines.

Viruses come from exosomes or tiny particles our bodies produce. They are not infectious agents. The exosome theory states that if cells are poisoned, they produce viruses (secretions) to clean up the toxins.
This is what the plant kingdom does; when a tree has a beetle infestation, it makes a hormonal secretion to tell other trees to defend themselves.
Thus, Operation Coronavirus is not only a fake pandemic, but also a colossal and unprecedented worldwide psy op, based on exploiting our ignorance over the true nature of viruses. What a scam!
By Makia Freeman, Guest writer (excerpts), HumansAreFree.com
 

illuminatimess

Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
667
COVID-19 Fails Koch’s Postulates, Hence It Cannot Be Proven Scientifically

German scientist Robert Koch (Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch, 1843-1910) made great contributions to the field of microbiology. He is considered to be one of the founders of the field of modern bacteriology. He identified the specific causative agents of TB (tuberculosis), cholera and anthrax.

For his work on TB, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1905 in Physiology or Medicine. Koch established 4 criteria to identify the causative agent of a particular disease.
These criteria have become a gold standard for determining the existence of an infectious agent and for isolating and verifiying what is causing a disease. The criteria are a set of conditions known as Koch’s postulates.
Covid 19 Fails Koch's Postulates's Postulates

They are:

  1. The microorganism must be identified in all individuals affected by the disease, but not in healthy individuals.
  2. The microorganism can be isolated from the diseased individual and grown in culture.
  3. When introduced into a healthy individual, the cultured microorganism must cause disease.
  4. The microorganism must then be re-isolated from the experimental host, and found to be identical to the original microorganism.
Firstly, the coronavirus SARS-CoV2 (allegedly causing the disease COVID-19) has not been shown to be present only in sick people, but also in the healthy ones. There are countless cases of people having this virus with mild, minor or zero symptoms.
Recently Iceland tested a relatively large percentage of its population (around 5,000 people out of 364,000) and found that 0.86% (close to 1%) of Icelanders had the coronavirus. The symptoms? Little or none:
“Importantly, approximately half of the people who tested positive for COVID-19 are non-symptomatic, according to Gudnason as reported by BuzzFeed. The other half is mostly showing “very moderate cold-like symptoms.””

Secondly, the virus has never been isolated – which must be done with proper equipment such as electron microscopes and which cannot be achieved through CT scans (as the Chinese were using) and the flawed PCR test (more on this below).
The January 24th 2020 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine entitled A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019 describes how the scientists arrived at the idea of COVID-19: they took lung fluid samples and extracted RNA from them using the PCR test. It admits that the coronavirus failed Koch’s postulates:
“Further development of accurate and rapid methods to identify unknown respiratory pathogens is still needed … our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates.”

This means that COVID-19 cannot be prove scientifically. Which raises the very important question: is it a made-up virus?
Are RNA Samples and a Genetic Sequence Proof of a New Coronavirus?
David Crowe doesn’t believe there is even sufficient evidence to justify calling this a new virus, let alone a pandemic.
In his paper Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory, he writes:
“The world is suffering from a massive delusion based on the belief that a test for RNA is a test for a deadly new virus … If the virus exists, then it should be possible to purify viral particles. From these particles RNA can be extracted and should match the RNA used in this test.
“Until this is done it is possible that the RNA comes from another source, which could be the cells of the patient, bacteria, fungi, etc. There might be an association with elevated levels of this RNA and illness, but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus. Without purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted that an RNA test is proof that a virus is present.
“Definitions of important diseases are surprisingly loose, perhaps embarrassingly so. A couple of symptoms, maybe contact with a previous patient, and a test of unknown accuracy, is all you often need. While the definition of SARS, an earlier coronavirus panic, was self-limiting, the definition of the new coronavirus disease is open-ended, allowing the imaginary epidemic to grow.
“Putting aside the existence of the virus, if the coronavirus test has a problem with false positives (as all biological tests do) then testing an uninfected population will produce only false-positive tests, and the definition of the disease will allow the epidemic to go on forever.
“This strange new disease, officially named COVID-19, has none of its own symptoms. Fever and cough, previously blamed on uncountable viruses and bacteria, as well as environmental contaminants, are most common, as well as abnormal lung images, despite those being found in healthy people.”


He concludes:
“The coronavirus panic is just that, an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test, that has never been connected to a virus. And which won’t be connected to a virus unless the virus is purified. Furthermore, even if the test can detect a novel virus the presence of a virus is not proof that it is the cause of the severe symptoms that some people who test positive experience (but not all who test positive).
“Finally, even if the test can detect a virus, and it is dangerous, we do not know what the rate of false positives is. And even a 1% false positive rate could produce 100,000 false positive results just in a city the size of Wuhan and could mean that a significant fraction of the positive test results being found are false positives.
“The use of powerful drugs because doctors are convinced that they have a particularly potent virus on their hands, especially in older people, with pre-existing health conditions, is likely to lead to many deaths. As with SARS.
“There is very little science happening. There is a rush to explain everything that is happening in a way that does not question the viral paradigm, does not question the meaningfulness of test results, and that promotes the use of untested antiviral drugs.”

Yes, anti-viral drugs (which do a lot of damage to your body), and, more to the point, mandatory vaccinations.

Fake Tests for a Fake Pandemic?
Insiders and whistleblowers such as the one in the article Insider Exposes COVID-19 Coronavirus Scam have revealed how there are coronavirus test kits being distributed which don’t even test for the specific SARS-CoV2 strain! They just test for generic coronavirus (coronavirus is defined as the “common cold” in medical encyclopedias) which of course will produce more false positive (as the NWO agenda dictates).

Meanwhile, the Medical Industry relies on the PCR test which I have exposed in other articles as wholly inadequate. The PCR Test is a surrogate test since it doesn’t actually isolate the virus. The founder of the PCR test Kary Mullins has admitted that you can’t use PCR “to prove infectious etiology or to diagnose an infectious disease.”

Besides, you can manipulate the results PCR will yield by choosing how many cycles (amplifications) to run. For some diseases, if you lower the number of cycles to 35, it can make everyone appear negative, while if you increase them to above 35, it can make everyone appear positive.

We All Have Viruses, All The Time, as Part of our Virome and Immune System
The human body is composed of 6 trillion cells, 60 trillion bacteria and 380 trillion viruses. Just as we have a microbiome of friendly bacteria which forms the basis of our immune system and 2nd brain in our gut, so too do we have a virome (a collection and community of viruses) which play a role in our healing.
Through the ascendency of germ theory over host theory/terrain theory, the mainstream paradigm now teaches that viruses are “bad guys”, infectious agents “out there”, who can invade the body – thus reinforcing the need for Big Pharma drugs and vaccines.

Viruses come from exosomes or tiny particles our bodies produce. They are not infectious agents. The exosome theory states that if cells are poisoned, they produce viruses (secretions) to clean up the toxins.
This is what the plant kingdom does; when a tree has a beetle infestation, it makes a hormonal secretion to tell other trees to defend themselves.
Thus, Operation Coronavirus is not only a fake pandemic, but also a colossal and unprecedented worldwide psy op, based on exploiting our ignorance over the true nature of viruses. What a scam!
By Makia Freeman, Guest writer (excerpts), HumansAreFree.com
Didn’t Mullins himself say that the PCR test indicates basically nothing?
 

Helioform

Star
Joined
Oct 2, 2017
Messages
3,195
Another "fact-check" article on Bill Gates from USA Today. If you want a very good example of shitty "journalism" there you have it. They don't even refute anything they just say "there is no evidence for that claim" even though you can easily check for yourself. LOL Anyone knows if USA Today receives funding from Gates?

 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,157
Didn’t Mullins himself say that the PCR test indicates basically nothing?
No, I believe he was against the PCR being used as a diagnostic test as it was never intended to be one. It was meant for research purposes.
Two very worthwhile articles.
Coronavirus: The Truth about PCR Test Kit from the Inventor and Other Experts


Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?
 

illuminatimess

Veteran
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
667
No, I believe he was against the PCR being used as a diagnostic test as it was never intended to be one. It was meant for research purposes.
Two very worthwhile articles.
Coronavirus: The Truth about PCR Test Kit from the Inventor and Other Experts


Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?
Thanks. But what’s the use of it then?
 

Frank Badfinger

Superstar
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
16,157
Thanks. But what’s the use of it then?
The reason is that the intended use of the PCR was, and still is, to apply it as a manufacturing technique, being able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times, and not as a diagnostic tool to detect viruses.

---------------------------------
From the Coronavirus: The Truth about PCR Test Kit from the Inventor and Other Experts Article

On the other hand, from an article also by Celia Farber, David Crowe, “a Canadian researcher with a degree in biology and mathematics and host of “The Infectious Myth” podcast, also the president of the think-tank Rethinking AIDS, also clearly explained the problems with the PCR based coronavirus testing, “revealing a world of unimaginable complexity, as well as trickery”:

“The first thing to know is that the test is not binary. In fact, I don’t think there are any tests for infectious disease that are positive or negative. What they do is they take some kind of a continuum and they arbitrarily say this point is the difference between positive and negative.”

He continued:

“PCR is really a manufacturing technique. You start with one molecule. You start with a small amount of DNA and on each cycle the amount doubles, which doesn’t sound like that much, but if you, if you double 30 times, you get approximately a billion times more material than you started with. So as a manufacturing technique, it’s great. What they do is they attach a fluorescent molecule to the RNA as they produce it. You shine a light at one wavelength, and you get a response, you get light sent back at a different wavelength. So, they measure the amount of light that comes back and that’s their surrogate for how much DNA there is. I’m using the word DNA. There’s a step in RT- PCR test which is where you convert the RNA to DNA. So, the PCR test is actually not using the viral RNA. It’s using DNA, but it’s like the complimentary RNA. So logically it’s the same thing, but it can be confusing. Like why am I suddenly talking about DNA? Basically, there’s a certain number of cycles.”

Regarding Kary Mullis’ intention for the PCR, this is what he said:

“I’m sad that he isn’t here to defend his manufacturing technique. Kary did not invent a test. He invented a very powerful manufacturing technique that is being abused. What are the best applications for PCR? Not medical diagnostics. He knew that and he always said that.”


He went on to say:


“I don’t think they understand what they’re doing; I think it’s out of control. They don’t know how to end this. This is what I think what happened: They have built a pandemic machine over many years and, and as you know, there was a pandemic exercise not long before this whole thing started.”
 
Last edited:
Top