"Operation Legend" Launches - Sending a "surge" of federal agents to U.S. Cities... "No Choice" ???

[Thunderian]

I presented insurance as one option. It may not work out for everyone, but at least it's there.

But if it doesn’t totally replace the business that’s been destroyed, how can it be an acceptable option? Wouldn’t a better way be, as I suggested, to not destroy the business in the first place?

Your reaction to Americans losing their homes and businesses to the mob is a shrug and a “well there’s insurance,” but you have no sympathy when it’s not able to restore their lives to where they were before the “peaceful protests” came along and brightened everyone’s future by setting it on fire. Do you actually listen to yourself?

 

[Aero]

What evidence is there that they are "being arrested without cause"? Sounds like a nice steaming load of media BS

The government admitted to proactively arresting people. -yawn.

 

[Aero]

But if it doesn’t totally replace the business that’s been destroyed, how can it be an acceptable option? Wouldn’t a better way be, as I suggested, to not destroy the business in the first place?

Your reaction to Americans losing their homes and businesses to the mob is a shrug and a “well there’s insurance,” but you have no sympathy when it’s not able to restore their lives to where they were before the “peaceful protests” came along and brightened everyone’s future by setting it on fire. Do you actually listen to yourself?

People losing their freedom over nothing is a bigger injustice that some businesses burning down.

I never said I was not sympathetic. My comment for people to stop complaining was tongue in cheek.

 

[lightseeker]

The government admitted to proactively arresting people. -yawn.

Here’s the quote that hype comes from

“The Department, because we don’t have that local law enforcement support, we are having to go out and proactively arrest individuals. And we need to do that because we need to hold them accountable. This idea that they can attack federal property and law enforcement officers and go to the other side of the street and say, “you can’t touch me,” is ridiculous.” dhs secretary on Fox News

so they are arresting people for destroying property. Big whoop. Biggest crybaby revolutionaries in history

 

[lightseeker]

 

[lightseeker]

Its not a peaceful protest. Its not a riot either because riots arent funded and organized over weeks. It is political violence, just literally terrorism. I wish donald trump followed through with anything he said so that these commies would be arrested and tried as terrorists which they are, unfortunately trumps only purpose is to say what is true and obvious to everyone, and have the entire political establishment get mad at it and say noo orange man bad. Classic dialectics of the establishment

 

[Aero]

Here’s the quote that hype comes from

“The Department, because we don’t have that local law enforcement support, we are having to go out and proactively arrest individuals. And we need to do that because we need to hold them accountable. This idea that they can attack federal property and law enforcement officers and go to the other side of the street and say, “you can’t touch me,” is ridiculous.” dhs secretary on Fox News

so they are arresting people for destroying property. Big whoop. Biggest crybaby revolutionaries in history

Funny how you immediately ask me for evidence to back my claims, but when a government official talks you just accept it.

 

[Aero]

But you called him one..

I would think that thinking people would care that people’s businesses were torched and wrecked and be concerned for those people and their livelihoods...their employees..seems normal to me.

Why would you bring up insurance over don’t do it in the first place? it was totally preventable..no one has the right to wreck someone else’s business.

Do you think I hurt his feelings? My bad if so.

I agree nobody has the right to torch a business. But the fact that businesses got torched doesn't justify the government breaking the law.

Haven't you heard two wrongs don't make a right?

 

[lightseeker]

Funny how you immediately ask me for evidence to back my claims, but when a government official talks you just accept it.

You didn’t give evidence you just said a phrase. So I looked up where that came from. And there was another half to the quote

 

[Aero]

You didn’t give evidence you just said a phrase. So I looked up where that came from. And there was another half to the quote

That's a deflection if I ever saw one.

Put simply you haven't asked for one bit of evidence that anyone the feds are rounding up is actually guilty.

 

[lightseeker]

That's a deflection if I ever saw one.

Put simply you haven't asked for one bit of evidence that anyone the feds are rounding up is actually guilty.

Yeah I did. That's literally what i asked for lol I was curious if it existed. You said some portion of a quote and went "yawn"
snidley. Why do we have to rehash something that happened 30 seconds ago

 

[Lisa]

Do you think I hurt his feelings? My bad if so.

I agree nobody has the right to torch a business. But the fact that businesses got torched doesn't justify the government breaking the law.

Haven't you heard two wrongs don't make a right?

No, lol! But you did call him a bleeding heart because he cares that people lost their livelihoods..you don’t seem to care so what do you think that makes you?

The businesses getting torched means the gov absolutely must stand up to that and stop it. If they don’t and they didn’t ..then yes, if the pres is gonna send troops to do that then it’s all good. The onus was on the local then state governments to do that...and not only did they refuse..they encouraged it. Which honestly they should all lose their jobs and be charged with inciting a riot in their cities.

Not stopping a wrong is more wrong.

 

[Aero]

Yeah I did. That's literally what i asked for lol I was curious if it existed. You said some portion of a quote and went "yawn"
snidley. Why do we have to rehash something that happened 30 seconds ago

You might be misreading my last post. The question is about whether or not each individual protestor is guilty or not. Not if the the government is guilty.

We have already established the government is guilty by their own admission.

 

[Thunderian]

This insurrection will put Trump back in the White House. People may have been OK with a drooling Biden instead of Trump, but there is no way a majority of people are going to put up with this low-grade terrorism for much longer, and the Democratic Party has offered nothing in the way of a solution. They won’t even admit that the rioters are doing anything wrong.

Nadler called violence in Portland a myth. Read this Twitter thread from Mike Balsamo, who spent last weekend inside the Portland courthouse as it was being attacked by rioters.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287606651491516420

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1287606653110517760

And some guy is whining that a cop hit him? Man up, you pussy. If you love America, you should have been inside that courthouse where the real threat was.

 

[lightseeker]

You might be misreading my last post. The question is about whether or not each individual protestor is guilty or not. Not if the the government is guilty.

We have already established the government is guilty by their own admission.

If the individual protestor is guilty of a crime, then it is ok to arrest them. I asked what evidence you had for the claim that they are being arrested for no reason. You said the words "proactive arrests". I found where that came from, a quote followed with the persons arrested had been destroying property and were not being arrested by the local police for political reasons. Are we on the same page with the sequence of events here?

 

[Aero]

No, lol! But you did call him a bleeding heart because he cares that people lost their livelihoods..you don’t seem to care so what do you think that makes you?

The businesses getting torched means the gov absolutely must stand up to that and stop it. If they don’t and they didn’t ..then yes, if the pres is gonna send troops to do that then it’s all good. The onus was on the local then state governments to do that...and not only did they refuse..they encouraged it. Which honestly they should all lose their jobs and be charged with inciting a riot in their cities.

Not stopping a wrong is more wrong.

By the standards of VC not caring about people fits me right in.

Nobody advocated to do nothing about violent protests. We are just saying not to go full Nazi over it.

 

[Aero]

If the individual protestor is guilty of a crime, then it is ok to arrest them. I asked what evidence you had for the claim that they are being arrested for no reason. You said the words "proactive arrests". I found where that came from, a quote followed with the persons arrested had been destroying property and were not being arrested by the local police for political reasons. Are we on the same page with the sequence of events here?

Apparently not since you got some tricky standards for evidence.

Cop says someone is guilty and your like Yes Sir officer sir. The reality is the law doesn't work like that. Unless someone is admitting to a crime words are not evidence

 

[Lisa]

This insurrection will put Trump back in the White House.

That’s exactly it! The dems are blinded by their hatred of trump for winning in 2016 and they can’t see that people don’t really like this or want to live with this violence every day.

I kinda have to wonder though what parents of the college aged kids think about their children doing this? If they are on the left they probably are encouraging but if they are on the right they must be horrified..I would be.

 

[Lisa]

By the standards of VC not caring about people fits me right in.

Nobody advocated to do nothing about violent protests. We are just saying not to go full Nazi over it.

The dem leaders in those cities are doing nothing about it. Which is why trump feels he must do something.

 

[Thunderian]

The pro-riot faction would have slightly more credibility if they weren’t always forced to lie and backpedal to make their case. You’d think it would bother them a little more.

There are no secret police out arresting innocents. There are properly badged and identified officers of the law serving warrants on and arresting known criminals. There is zero evidence otherwise, and some of the people here might want to examine why they believe such a thing.