Cracka or how anti-white totalitarism became acceptable.

Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
2,506
I'm not black or white but I do feel uncomfortable when non-white people use 'cracker' or any alternative spelling online or other deregotry terms for likes and clapbacks. Like for some it feels good to attack the 'white man' but if they said the N-word, hell would break loose (as it should) but that doesn't mean the jibes againt white people or any other race makes it acceptable.

Anything to distract us from bigger issues..by focusing on petty issues like differences of skin colour. I also don't want people to take this the wrong way, I appreciate that it is a very complex issue but I promise you there are bigger threats out there..
I dont like any of those derogatory words but you have to understand the logical progression of things.

Why are some non whites angry and use those words. Because mostly they have been put in a shitty situation, largely because of white people who run the system, and other white people who help them administer it.

Reconciliation for past wrongs has never taken place so of course there will be pent up anger.

Refusing to reconcile, is the initial problem. Many whites today are so full of pride and anger and do not want any reconciliation, so why should they be surprised if that breeds anger towards them.
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,423
I hear you.
The decline of so-called Whites is part of the plan, but the idea that the Elites are anti-white is not correct.
They are anti-White to so-called White people. They are anti-Black to so-called Blacks. They are anti-Japanese to the Japanese.
And I could continue the list. The division is by design.
The different locations you speak of are different.
The Americas were populated with so-called Brown people.
There were people in every country in the Americas.
The whole world has been dominated by the Elite for thousands of years.
Should you be able to date who you want and live how you want? Absolutely.
I hear you too. Eventually all nations will have to succumb to the cult of diversity and the erosion of their identities, but it's clearly oriented at First World (mostly European majority) countries.

From the UN:

Replacement Migration UN.jpg
source

Before I go deeper in this discussion. Do you believe in Divine Providence?
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,423
(Demographic transition theory)
View attachment 38584
As a country progresses from being primarily agrarian to becoming industrialised and technologically advanced, its birth rates are observed to decrease as a consequence. Its birth rates begin to slow for a multitude of reasons: birth control, family plannining, working women who have less time to raise children, less people deciding to have children, etc.
Europe is highly industrialised and technologically advanced, and exhibits low birth rates. One would expect, that as third-world countries similarly become highly industrialised in the future, they will begin to show similarly lower birth rates. I don't believe, therefore, that declining fertility rates are the result of a targeted attempt by the elite to eliminate whites, but a phenomenon caused by the rise of contraception, feminism, less people deciding to have children in Europe. By contrast, Asians, Africans still highly value the traditional family unit, and are less likely to be consider family planning, or to be militant feminists.
I agree with everything you said, but it doesn't answer some questions.

Another perspective could wonder, the means are there to lower birth rates in large parts of Asia and Africa. What's keeping industrialists from industrializing the Third World and emancipating the local populations? What's keeping them from raising the standards of life in those countries to stabilize birth rates and prevent mass emigration away from those territories while simultaneously allowing migration into the industrialized First World countries? Why did they eliminate someone like Gaddafi who did raise the living standard in his country, reduced the birth rate from more than 7 to less than 3 in 30 years, and prevented a large black flight from the African continent? Why does European leadership continue to impose policies in Europe that sterilizes European fertility and compensate them by importing a mass of non-European immigrants whose birth rates tend to be much higher? Why do they keep advocating and implementing population control measures (like abortion, contraception, more career-focused than family-focused towards women, euthanasia, etc.) in western countries when European fertility is at 1.59 when we need 2.11 to be stable, yet they allow Asian and African populations to more than double in 50 years?

There are some contradictions here that cannot be explained away by the phenomenon you've brought up. They could choose policies to incentivize couples to procreate, like they're doing in Russia and Hungary, but they don't. Instead they systematically opt for replacement migration.
 

free2018

Star
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Messages
2,453
I'm sorry but systemic racism and the suppression and attack of black freedoms and the specific targeting of the black race is not a hoax or a psy op. The fact that you could deny 400 years of oppression and reduce it to such a silly meme is part of the problem.

And that ignorance is precisely why we are headed for a race/cultural war.

That refusal to address the inhumane foundations of this country and the lack of empathy is the problem.

Nothing will ever improve if we ignore the suffering and the trials and tribulations of others.

The elites dont want you to imagine yourself in the shoes of "others" they just want you frightened, and angry of those others so you remain divided.

That's literally most of what I see in these threads.
You didn't address what I said.
You just posted a bunch of strawmen and didn't really address the substance of any of my comments.
I don't want to derail Wigi's thread.
 
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
2,506
You didn't address what I said.
You just posted a bunch of strawmen and didn't really address the substance of any of my comments.
I don't want to derail Wigi's thread.
No you pretty much called the black struggle in America a "hoax" and "manufactured"

I dont care about Floyd or BLM in a vacuum, but the righteous anger is very much legitimate and I see nothing but people trying to downplay and discredit this. Stupid memes of George Soros are insulting because you would be insinuating that black people have no minds of their own, and have no ability to fight back against a system which has destroyed their heritage, enslaved them and continued to suppress their human spirit. Unless of course some billionaire orchestrator has them controlled by his finger tips. It's the same nonsense that was said during civil rights, with the same reactionary white conservatives claiming it was a "communist plot" The exact same strategies and gameplan, the same dismissive garbage spouted again by the same group of intolerant fools who wonder why they get such a bad wrap, and why people "dont like them"

This isn't necessarily directed towards you, but a lot of the sentiment I have seen on this forum, and you by no means are anywhere near the worst of it, but I take issue with you calling George Floyd a "hoax", because even if Floyd never even existed, the injustices that have sparked these mass protests are very real.
 

free2018

Star
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Messages
2,453
I hear you too. Eventually all nations will have to succumb to the cult of diversity and the erosion of their identities, but it's clearly oriented at First World (mostly European majority) countries.

From the UN:

View attachment 38601
source

Before I go deeper in this discussion. Do you believe in Divine Providence?
I hear you.
ORDO AB CHAO. Order out of chaos. The New World Order?
It's on the US dollar bill. No one wanted to pay attention.
The erosion goes much deeper than ethnicity or phenotype.
The goal is population eradication. Humanity.
The UN is responsible for what you decry in your home country.
The "immigration" operation was ushered in by the UN.
The UN is of course furthering many Masonic agendas. The UN is the seat of the so called world
government.
The UN operations are quite extensive.

God is good, but I don't really want to speak too much about that in this thread.
God created humanity in all its' variety. Why would the Most High eliminate part of his creation based on phenotype?
 

free2018

Star
Joined
Sep 8, 2018
Messages
2,453
No you pretty much called the black struggle in America a "hoax" and "manufactured"

I dont care about Floyd or BLM in a vacuum, but the righteous anger is very much legitimate and I see nothing but people trying to downplay and discredit this. Stupid memes of George Soros are insulting because you would be insinuating that black people have no minds of their own, and have no ability to fight back against a system which has destroyed their heritage, enslaved them and continued to suppress their human spirit. Unless of course some billionaire orchestrator has them controlled by his finger tips. It's the same nonsense that was said during civil rights, with the same reactionary white conservatives claiming it was a "communist plot" The exact same strategies and gameplan, the same dismissive garbage spouted again by the same group of intolerant fools who wonder why they get such a bad wrap, and why people "dont like them"

This isn't necessarily directed towards you, but a lot of the sentiment I have seen on this forum, and you by no means are anywhere near the worst of it, but I take issue with you calling George Floyd a "hoax", because even if Floyd never even existed, the injustices that have sparked these mass protests are very real.
I already addressed Floyd in a separate thread. I will not add anything to what I previously stated.
You are just continuing wit' straw men and false equivalencies.
What you call protests, I know to be government-sponsored.
What you call police shootings, I know to be government-sponsored.
What you call riots, I know to be government-sponsored. Just take a look at the brick deliveries.
I speak as clearly and impartially as I can from a spirit of truth. Americans for example are getting ready to kill each other
due to government-sponsored events. The race war will be bad. And it is government-sponsored.
I am not here to be liked. I am here to kick the TRUTH. Not my truth. The truth.
I will finish with this. The press is run by the CIA. Operation Mockingbird.
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2017
Messages
4,423
Here comes the blackwash!


Black Jesus painting will be installed in one of UK’s oldest cathedrals

blackwash jesus.jpg

One of Britain’s oldest churches is paying tribute to the Black Lives Matter movement by installing a version of Leonardo Da Vinci’s “The Last Supper” with Jesus recast as a black prophet.

...

The New York Post
 
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
1,269
Suspected you didn't. It's not uncommon for those adopted without any knowledge of where they come from or who their biological parents are to develop problems of identity, and for those internationally adopted a lack of sense of belonging. So I understand that you see identity differently than I or most people born into their biological families and ancestral nations do.
See, that's the thing though. I don't see it as a "problem with identity". It's liberating, since I get to decide what's actually important to me.


Here comes the blackwash!


Black Jesus painting will be installed in one of UK’s oldest cathedrals

View attachment 38693

One of Britain’s oldest churches is paying tribute to the Black Lives Matter movement by installing a version of Leonardo Da Vinci’s “The Last Supper” with Jesus recast as a black prophet.

...

The New York Post
I mean, it's silly... But realistically, so is painting Christ as white.
 

Red Sky at Morning

Superstar
Joined
Mar 15, 2017
Messages
13,931
See, that's the thing though. I don't see it as a "problem with identity". It's liberating, since I get to decide what's actually important to me.




I mean, it's silly... But realistically, so is painting Christ as white.
I like the way that the series “The Chosen” portrayed Jesus.

 

Lisa

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
20,288
I think the anti white movement became acceptable because whites can’t push back on it or they’re going to be called racist and perhaps get hurt. People have families and they don’t want their kids hurt and they especially don’t want bullies to have a reason to target their kids at school. And then you have those people who were taught in schools and reinforced in college that their white privilege is wrong and they should hate themselves for being white. It’s a two pronged attack...and for what? Power? Greed?
 
Top