I was re-reading your reply and have to comment on this statement. Please take the beam out of your own eye! I'm referencing living, historic Israelitic tribes scattered around North Africa and throughout Asia while your talking about imaginary Britain/US as Mannaseh and Ephraim, Jesus visiting North America, and your insistence there will be WW#3. So xing what? Barely a single person can take this stuff seriously.
What evidence is there that the people living in and around North Africa and throughout Asia are "Israelitic" tribes please? And what makes Britain/US as Ephraim/Manasseh respectively somehow imaginary? Even within this thread, if someone were conducting a hearing on the subject, they would be hard-pressed to take your viewpoint based on the evidence put forth.
There's also the irony of someone claiming the Bible isn't a historical text, i.e. the Bible supposedly cannot be trusted, while at the same time arguing they have identified the people of the Bible using different texts and methods. It's akin to someone looking for clues as to the whereabouts of the (fictional) Lilliputians everywhere except in Gulliver's Travels.
Like I said you're obsessed like those of the Synagogue of Satan to claim your identity when the fact is as
@Kung Fu put it, the lifestyle is what's important.
It appears you've missed the point of sharing this information with others. It has absolutely nothing to do with thinking the Brits and Americans are some sort of master race or that anyone can claim to be "saved" on the basis of the color of the human they're incarnating. We absolutely will be judged on the merits of our thoughts, words and actions, and even then, it will be our Creator's graciousness bridging the gap.
The point in sharing this information is to reveal to others the depth of the prophecies which validate the Bible in a way that simply cannot be dismissed by any honest and meticulous truth-seeker.
The worshipers of YAH are interspersed genetically through the nations.
Agreed.
How are we not all possibly of the seed of Abraham?
What's specifically being discussed within this thread is the seed of Jacob/Israel, Abraham's grandson through his son Isaac.
In reality Islam is the greatest modern representative of the religion of Abraham so all good.
Abraham didn't have a religion; he just had faith in God and did as he was Commanded to do, as every
true believer should do.
In reality, there are no real "Muslims" just as there are no real "Christians" or "Jews". Islam is just another
evil organized religion, like Christianity and Talmudic Judaism, as well as all of the non-Abrahamic religions.
What we all should be doing,
IF we were true believers, is keep The Law that our Creator gave us, as we promised to do. Just as it says to do in the Koran.
Have faith man, the power of this universe will not allow wickedness to prosper forever.
Agreed. It's so awful now it's difficult to understand how so many remain asleep to all of this evil.
I'm the one regurgitating Zionist mythology?
Where'd you copy this info from, the WJW? You need a refresher on basic, up to date archaeological/ethnographic history. I recommend "The Invention of the Jewish People" by Schlomo Sand. Skip ahead in the narration if you like. The Bible is not a historical text, as the archaeological evidence and verified timeline of Egypt and Palestine don't line up.
This is the
illogical/unreasonable circular argument that's been used in the fields of archaeology and Egyptology according to David Rohl, to create the
illusion that the Bible text and the archaeological evidence don't line up:
- Egyptologists use the Bible to date the start of the 22nd Dynasty to 945 BC
- They then date Ramesses II based on that 22nd Dynasty Date
- They then find no evidence for the Exodus and Conquest in the time of Ramesses
- They therefore reject the Bible as a work of 'pious fiction'
- So the Bible is used to establish Egyptian chronology which is then used to dismiss the Bible
- This is a prime example of a circular argument!
Once these impediments in reasoning are removed, and a diligent search through the available evidence is made, amazingly everything lines up perfectly.
I'm not saying the laws of Moses didn't exist in the region but the accepted dates after the Assyrian captivity are nothing buy myth-history.
When people make these kinds of blanket statements without any evidence of any kind to back them up, they lose credibility. Please provide any evidence you may have that the ten-tribed "House of Israel" wasn't taken into captivity by the Assyrians c. 722 BC.
The Assyrians themselves fled with the "House of Israel" before the Babylonians to what is today Germany, where the Assyrians settled. According to a
legend recorded in the 12th-century
Deeds of the Treveri, the city of Trier, considered to be the oldest city in Germany, was founded by an
eponymous, otherwise-unrecorded prince of
Assyria named
Trebeta, placing the city's
founding legend independent of and centuries before
ancient Rome's. A medieval inscription on the façade of the Red House in Trier market stated:
ante romam treviris stetit annis mille trecentis.
perstet et æterna pace frvatvr. amen.
Trebeta's parents were said to have been
Ninus, a legendary "King of Assyria" invented by the
ancient Greeks, and an unknown mother who was Ninus's wife before
Semiramis. Semiramis took control of the kingdom upon his father's death and Trebeta was forced into exile, wandering Europe before settling at Trier. His body was said to have been cremated on Petrisberg.
It's no wonder the English language is considered to be a Germanic root language given the amount of time the "House of Israel" spent with the Assyrians.
On the subject of languages, the closest language on the planet today to Hebrew is Welsh, which is yet another clue of where the "ten-lost tribes of Israel" migrated after leaving Assyria.
Mythical Judaism begins with Ezra/Nehemiah, who in their legend led a group of supposed returned Israelites in Palestine. Again the timeline of these Jewish tales don't line up with Babylonian records. The Cyrus Decree never existed, no would there be any logic in it existing. Ezra very well may have been a Persian, Zoroastrian administrator. Look it up. Either way their chronicles and their Talmudic scripture only go back as far as 200-300 BC.
The conspiracy which became Talmudic Judaism began in Babylon, where the two-tribed "House of Judah" was taken into captivity by Nebuchadnezzar's army c 604-588 BC., as attested to by both Jeremiah (
11:9) and Ezekiel (
22:25). The Babylonian Talmud thus dates back to c 550 BC, and is extra-biblical and thus
NOT Scripture. It seems you are confusing dates with when the Greek Septuagint of the Old Covenant was completed.
So yes, your OT Bible is the Jewish Tanakh.
The Old Covenant is
NOT "Jewish", despite all of the Zionist programming that people do regurgitate (as you just did). It is Hebrew, which is why it was written in Hebrew, the language of the Hebrews. The Israelites were Hebrews,
NOT "Jews", a name that was later applied to the "House of Judah", before it was co-opted by the Idumean-Edomite and Ashkenazi converts to Talmudic Judaism that took over Talmudic Judaism.
The overwhelming majority of the 12 tribes of Israel were the 10-tribed "House of Israel" which not only retained the name Israel, but were
NEVER referred to as "Jews" in Scripture, which would be akin to calling all Americans "Californians" or all British people "Scots".
The Ethiopian Falasha have no account of the minor prophets or Ezra and the Maccabees etc., showing a later group who reworked the literature. It's worth noting some of the narration within the Bible was held sacred by groups in the entire region.
Understood, but what exactly does that prove?
We can't believe a word of what we're told about when the Hebrew language went extinct, DNA results of the ancient inhabitants, dates of when Abraham or Moses lived, when the "Bible" was written- any of it. We're dealing with a racist, murdering force that will do anything to preserve their power. Be careful of including their version of history in a search for the truth.
If someone actually believes that our all-powerful God has allowed puny humans to corrupt His Message to mankind, which includes His Law, then they have no hope of finding the truth.
We can absolutely date the Bible, and can match it up to Egyptian chronology as well. And the research into the origins of our modern alphabet is another fascinating subject that confirms the Bible narrative and leads straight from Hebrew through the Israelite Phoenicians to modern-day English.
What people need to do is to learn to stop confusing the Scriptures, both the Bible and the Koran, with the organized religions that use and abuse our Creator's name and His message for their own monetary gain and temporary worldly power. The two have absolutely nothing in common, as anyone who studies those two texts, and compares them to what the religions teach and do, can confirm for themselves.
Peace be upon you.