The Royal Family and Brexit

[Lisa]

Why this interest in british royalty? Surely it is of relevance only to those in the uk

Part of British tourism is the royal family. When I was a teen, I got up and watched the fairytale marriage of the century...Prince Charles and Lady Diana..but then I wasn’t the only one who did that.

 

[Cintra]

So why does the rest of the world care what the uk does with its tourist attractions?

 

[Lisa]

So why does the rest of the world care what the uk does with its tourist attractions?

It is news and a current event.

 

[Cintra]

Thats not really an answer to my question.

Why are they british royals considered to be so important to the world that they are 'current events' and 'news'?

Why so much interest in what is an internal british matter, and as they are a constitutional monarchy actually have no power and no influence on the actual news and current events?

The antics of one powerless but privileged family is trivial.
Does the world see them as some kind of soap opera? And why give so much weight to something that is merely a distraction designed to part tourists from their money?

 

[saki]

 

[saki]

...funny stuff here.... from Hong Kong..... excerpts..... full at link...

And when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex tug at your heartstrings with talk about becoming “financially independent”, don’t forget they’re already filthy rich. Now, as celebrities no longer bound by palace protocol, the world is their oyster.

While the very concept of monarchy, which Mark Twain once described as “the grotesquest of all the swindles ever invented by man”, in this day and age is ridiculously outdated, the existence of Britain’s royal family in particular is like a broken pencil – pointless.They’re a complete waste of time, space and, above all, taxpayers’ hard-earned money. According to anti-royal campaign group Republic, British taxpayers lose about US$468 million a year just to keep these caterpillars of the commonwealth well fed in the garden of England.

Opinion: Megxit schmexit – no bigger waste of time, space and money than UK royal family

Yonden Lhatoo rubbishes the latest news cycle concerning the British royal family and questions the justification for maintaining a useless monarchy at the expense of taxpayers.

www.scmp.com

 

[Cintra]

...funny stuff here.... from Hong Kong..... excerpts..... full at link...

And when the Duke and Duchess of Sussex tug at your heartstrings with talk about becoming “financially independent”, don’t forget they’re already filthy rich. Now, as celebrities no longer bound by palace protocol, the world is their oyster.

While the very concept of monarchy, which Mark Twain once described as “the grotesquest of all the swindles ever invented by man”, in this day and age is ridiculously outdated, the existence of Britain’s royal family in particular is like a broken pencil – pointless.They’re a complete waste of time, space and, above all, taxpayers’ hard-earned money. According to anti-royal campaign group Republic, British taxpayers lose about US$468 million a year just to keep these caterpillars of the commonwealth well fed in the garden of England.

Opinion: Megxit schmexit – no bigger waste of time, space and money than UK royal family

Yonden Lhatoo rubbishes the latest news cycle concerning the British royal family and questions the justification for maintaining a useless monarchy at the expense of taxpayers.

www.scmp.com

Thats exactly my point.
You quote from a chinese newspaper article that quotes an american writer.

Why should either have any interest, or suppose themselves qualified to have any say, on how the british run their premier tourist attraction?

A british visitor may go to france and enjoy visiting the eiffel tower or the louvre, but they do not feel they have some kind of stake in them, or any right to tell the French how to manage them.

Why does the rest of the world feel itself entitled to tell britain how to manage their monarchy?
Why do they care?
Is it just jealousy that britain still has its royalty and other countries don't?

 

[Lisa]

Thats not really an answer to my question.

Why are they british royals considered to be so important to the world that they are 'current events' and 'news'?

Why so much interest in what is an internal british matter, and as they are a constitutional monarchy actually have no power and no influence on the actual news and current events?

The antics of one powerless but privileged family is trivial.
Does the world see them as some kind of soap opera? And why give so much weight to something that is merely a distraction designed to part tourists from their money?

I thought you meant why would I put this in news and current events.

Why are they so important to the world? That I don’t really know...guess good pr? Being a popular tourist attraction? Or maybe the wedding of the century captured our imaginations/love of romance where the beautiful woman gets the prince and they live happily ever after...until they don’t. Maybe it’s because of Diana who was the most famous woman in the world at that time..and it seems the queen of hearts like she wanted to be?

It would be a big deal if the queen and her family went from being a monarch to just some rich people...all those century’s of tradition gone..poof! That I think is news.

I went to Buckingham palace and I’m sure that’s a stop on anyone’s London itinerary...who knows what tourist money Britain could lose without the royal family? I’m sure people will still visit the palace whether she’s there or not. I couldn’t buy their china though...man that was expensive stuff!

 

[Lisa]

View attachment 30739

I like lat me out! Lol!

 

[Cintra]

I thought you meant why would I put this in news and current events.

Why are they so important to the world? That I don’t really know...guess good pr? Being a popular tourist attraction? Or maybe the wedding of the century captured our imaginations/love of romance where the beautiful woman gets the prince and they live happily ever after...until they don’t. Maybe it’s because of Diana who was the most famous woman in the world at that time..and it seems the queen of hearts like she wanted to be?

It would be a big deal if the queen and her family went from being a monarch to just some rich people...all those century’s of tradition gone..poof! That I think is news.

I went to Buckingham palace and I’m sure that’s a stop on anyone’s London itinerary...who knows what tourist money Britain could lose without the royal family? I’m sure people will still visit the palace whether she’s there or not. I couldn’t buy their china though...man that was expensive stuff!

Thank you for your reply.
Apparently the queen keeps her cornflakes in a tupperware container to keep them fresh. So maybe she doesn't use the china either.

 

[Lisa]

Thank you for your reply.
Apparently the queen keeps her cornflakes in a tupperware container to keep them fresh. So maybe she doesn't use the china either.

You’re welcome

I’ve never heard of a china cornflakes container, haha, but if there were one, I’m sure she’d have it!

 

[Cintra]

And if she doesn't get it she will execute you in a road tunnel.

 

[Lisa]

And if she doesn't get it she will execute you in a road tunnel.

That’s the theory anyway. I’m not sure that’s really what happened..but then again I’m not sure that wasn’t what happened...the world will probably never know unless Harry does know and that’s one of the things he’s threatening to talk about if he doesn’t get his way?

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's 'threat of a no-holds barred interview': Couple's confidante Tom Bradby says they could go public if they don't get their way over Megxit - amid fears they would brand royal household 'sexist and racist'

Meghan and Harry's 'threat of a no-holds barred interview'

Confidante of Harry and Meghan Tom Bradby has warned that if the Royal couple are left feeling hard done by, they may give a 'no-holds barred' interview which could further damage the monarchy.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Cintra]

No holds barred means 'kate was nasty' 'his mother didnt like me' 'the press harassed us'
Not 'look! Ill rip off my human mask and suck your brain with my lizard tongue'

 

[Lisa]

No holds barred means 'kate was nasty' 'his mother didnt like me' 'the press harassed us'
Not 'look! Ill rip off my human mask and suck your brain with my lizard tongue'

That’s a little dramatic don’t ya think? You follow Icke then?

 

[Cintra]

Lol.

No I think he is a mkulta disinformation agent programmed to discredit conspiracy theories through ridiculous and unbelievable claims.

 

[Lisa]

Lol.

No I think he is a mkulta disinformation agent programmed to discredit conspiracy theories through ridiculous and unbelievable claims.

So you do or you don’t believe the lizard tongue thing?

 

[Cintra]

No, not unless I see proof.

I used the idea in my post as a comic exaggeration of what 'no holds barred' could mean.

 

[Lisa]

No, not unless I see proof.

I wonder why you brought it up then?

 

[Cintra]

I used the idea in my post as a comic exaggeration of what 'no holds barred' could mean.

Do you follow icke and subscribe to the royal lizard bloodline theory?