No, but there are different ways to look at the issue and she puts things into perspective. What I find ironic is that ppl call her crazy without giving any real counter-argument to her statement.
The counter-arguments are present in this thread, but they only speak sense to those who believe in objective morality.
You said this:
"I honestly don't think our society can have a conversation about sex work without unpacking the sexist biases", then you quote the most sexist piece of literature (Despentes') as an interesting perspective. To her, marriage is "employment" for women. Sex between spouses is a chore and mothers and housewives are basically no different than prostitutes in a society where prostitution is legalized and free of stigma.
Some things to infer from what she said:
1. Marriage, the institution that provides women the most protection against sexual predators, becomes completely obsolete.
2. Men allegedly don't marry women out of love. They basically see their wives as subjects having agreed to engage in a maid-wench relationship for a bargain price. Men don't love, they exploit. (sexist part nr. 1)
3. Marriage exists so that women can ensure men's comfort, as if men's investments in marriage is not to ensure women's comfort, while that is in effect what a man's duty is and the main reason why women seek a husband. Men care for their own comfort, not their wife's, since they're incapable of loving them. (sexist part nr. 2)
4. She advocates mass divorce as a catalyst to break down society. Marriage supposedly is the institution that safeguards the social order of the powers-that-be because marriage inherently damages the reputation of prostitution. She would rather have women abandon the idea to engage in monogamy based on the natural and moral order of love and reproduction, and engage in sexual liberation as long as it is socially and legally endorsed and subject to the forces of money. This she calls dignity, when she clearly
wants women to be sexual objects.
This is what I mean with ideology being the product of an individual's actions. Despentes lives like a hedonist, surrenders herself to her lusts and is slave to the constant gratifications of her basic impulses. She's been a voluntary prostitute. She's an alcoholic. She's a drug addict. She promotes pornographic accessibility in the public sphere.
She makes the perfect proxy warrior of the oligarchs, even though she presents herself as being in opposition. She's in rebellion against the natural order, the social order, the sexual order, the moral order, and it is manifest in her own identities as a lesbian, an atheist, a feminist and an anarchist. She's an agent of chaos, and one can discern nothing less from but a few phrases of her opinion on marriage and prostitution.