In the video you posted, the presenter questions and is critical as to why the list of changes needed to "save the environment" is aimed mainly at society and not going after large corporations, who are the largest polluters. As he said "It's just a drop in the bucket."
Again, this is because its not about the environment, it's about control of the masses. The wording in the Guardian story mirrors UN Agenda 2030 initiatives that were based on globalist think tank jargon created decades ago. All fear based propaganda meant to further the NWO and the culling of the masses.
View attachment 28147
"The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
-Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations
"The emerging 'environmentalization' of our civilization
and the need for vigorous action in the interest of the entire global
community will inevitably have multiple political consequences.
Perhaps the most important of them will be a gradual change
in the status of the United Nations. Inevitably, it must
assume some aspects of a world government."
- Mikhail Gorbachev,
State of the World Forum
"A keen and anxious awareness is evolving to suggest that
fundamental changes will have to take place in the world order
and its power structures, in the distribution of wealth and income.
Perhaps only a new and enlightened humanism
can permit mankind to negotiate this transition."
- Club of Rome,
Mankind at the Turning Point
"We are on the verge of a global transformation.
All we need is the right major crisis..."
- David Rockefeller,
Club of Rome executive member
"A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society
at the present North American material standard of living
would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard
of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible."
- United Nations,
Global Biodiversity Assessment
"...the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence
more than 500 million but less than one billion."
-Club of Rome,
Goals for Mankind