Ok I don't believe Jesus died for my sins so I'll skip that.
I only accept what Jesus says.
Iam only asking this for the sake of intellectual consistency.
Here are 4 verses where Jesus says that He is going to die and the purpose thereof.
Mark 10:33-34
‘We are going up to Jerusalem,’ he said, ‘and the Son of Man will be delivered over to the chief priests and the teachers of the law. They will condemn him to death and will hand him over to the Gentiles,34 who will mock him and spit on him, flog him and kill him. Three days later he will rise.’
Matthew 20:28
just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.’
Matthew 26:27-28
Then he took a cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them, saying, ‘Drink from it, all of you. 28 This is my blood of the[
b]covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
Matthew 26:31-32
Then Jesus told them, ‘This very night you will all fall away on account of me, for it is written:
‘“I will strike the shepherd,
and the sheep of the flock will be scattered.”[
c]
32 But after I have risen, I will go ahead of you into Galilee.’
So what exactly is it that you accept about Jesus? Just His ethical teachings, perhaps? Because I honestly don’t understand how you can believe or hold two opposing beliefs in your mind. The opposing beliefs being: Koran says- Jesus didn’t die for any sins, someone else took His place, avows redemption through shedding of blood etc against the obviously contradictory statements in the Christian scriptures. There is no way that you can wholeheartedly believe what Islam teaches and at the same time wholeheartedly accept Christ’s statements about His mission on earth. If you told us today that your favorite color is purple and someone else, 50yrs later, comes along and tells us that you said it was beige, which account do you think we should believe?
If you argue that all the above verses are interpolations or forced into His mouth, so to speak, I ask, how and when do you determine that? If the whole text is corrupt, Muslims would as soon dispense with the whole “Muhammad is predicted in the Torah” when they appeal to Isaiah 42 and Deuteronomy 17.
This question is similar to the one I asked Col. Valerio. He said:
Creationist pseudoscience is the worlds biggest disinformation campaign and opened the door for “fake news”.
The Bible is discredited if taken literally,........I don’t have a problem with the ethical teachings of Jesus
I asked:
Since you don’t have a problem with Jesus’ ethical teachings, do you hold the appeals He makes to history/OT historicity (therefore reaffirming the authenticity of the text and it’s contents) in the same regard?
Matthew 19:3-6
In the Olivet Discourse, He brings up Noah’s flood and Lot’s escape. So, do you think He was just regaling His audience with fables? Do you think He was reading the OT scrolls too literally? Especially, in regard to man’s origins or what you call “creationist pseudoscience”, who should we believe: Col. Valerio/Darwin or Christ?