I know that everything these days is an opportunity to bash Trump, but he had nothing to do with the deal Epstein got back in 2008. According to the lawyer of several of the women who are suing Epstein, Trump banned him from Mar-A-Lago after he assaulted a young woman there.
Yeah that was some “plea deal” eh? I’m sure it wasn’t a complete miscarriage of justice meant to protect untouchable people like the Clintons and Trump. I’m sure it’s just coincidence that Trump was accused of raping a 13 year old at Epstein’s party, a case which was only dropped after the girl allegedly received death threats. It’s also a coincidence that Trump ran a modeling/pageantry company for teenage girls, and Epstein once commented that he would run his modeling agency exactly like Trump’s (or something to that effect). Another odd coincidence is that Acosta, who signed the original miscarriage of justice aka plea deal is now labor secretary under Trump. Yeah, pure coincidence.I know that everything these days is an opportunity to bash Trump, but he had nothing to do with the deal Epstein got back in 2008. According to the lawyer of several of the women who are suing Epstein, Trump banned him from Mar-A-Lago after he assaulted a young woman there.
Trump and Epstein would have been in the same social class, and since both lived in New York and Florida, it would have been weird if there wasn't at least one picture of them together.
Conservabot brain-filter to English translation: Trump was the only one dumb enough to attempt damage control instead of pleading the fifth.
Dude... I mentioned the Clintons. I also mentioned Trump. If this blows open there will be so many more.Nevermind all the others. Just focus on Trump. The political stances by the usual suspects always bleed past objectivity. How about we see what comes out and go from there? And was there a mention of bots? Who needs them when humans act just like them after bathing in the media abyss?
You act like I would be upset if Clinton is brought down by this. I wouldn’t be, no one has damaged the Democratic Party more than he has.Nevermind all the others. Just focus on Trump. The political stances by the usual suspects always bleed past objectivity. How about we see what comes out and go from there? And was there a mention of bots? Who needs them when humans act just like them after bathing in the media abyss? And FWIW, there has been discussion in the Pedo thread on this. Some would gladly throw Trump under the bus along with several prominent dems just to get rid of him. The fact this happened so long ago now will hurt somewhat IMO. There is a need for more recent people to step forward in accusing Epstein and we could get that. It is clear he has been protected by corruption or the swamp (trigger), LOL.
What if this plays out as a pretext for Trump to attack and smear his enemies while making a power grab Q style?Look, we all know this is some kind of shiny bone suddenly cast upon us and the timing is interesting, to say the least. Most of us want any pedo to get their due but this seems unusual in that it should have been handled long ago and finally seems it will all come to a head now during a tumultuous time with a war for the mind in full effect. It is like, I want to see justice, for sure, yet not the engineered spin that may come with this. And while we are all re-caught up in this scandal and what news is to come, they have their ultimate distraction for their other projects.
It's all finally coming to a head because the plea deal imploded under scrutiny, which was inevitable after the sheer number of lawsuits it spawned. Two recent developments that appear to be major factors in the timing of this are the defamation suit filed against Dershowitz (who is likely guilty imo) and yet another of Epstein's victims going public and filing a sworn federal affidavit. Both happened just a few months ago.Look, we all know this is some kind of shiny bone suddenly cast upon us and the timing is interesting, to say the least. Most of us want any pedo to get their due but this seems unusual in that it should have been handled long ago and finally seems it will all come to a head now during a tumultuous time with a war for the mind in full effect. It is like, I want to see justice, for sure, yet not the engineered spin that may come with this. And while we are all re-caught up in this scandal and what news is to come, they have their ultimate distraction for their other projects.
Whom to believe? hmmm Probably not the daily mail and their completely unsourced claims. Just sayin.And another side of the story: Troubled woman ['Katie Johnson'] with a history of drug use who claimed that she was assaulted by Donald Trump at a Jeffrey Epstein sex party at age 13 MADE IT ALL UP
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html
Hmmm.... who to believe. As we've seen so many times before, accusations without real evidence is complete crap and not something to convict people by. Guilty until proven innocent... it's the law of the land.