Converse Launches LGBT Shoe Line Featuring Preteen ‘Drag Kid’

The Zone

Star
Joined
Mar 13, 2017
Messages
3,165
right, because someone so morally inferior to yourself cannot possibly lead a fulfilling life. ;)
LOL, a passing shot, as usual, is predictable. All those little shots you've taken in the past and what is gained? A little attention from me, that's all.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
2,024
LOL, a passing shot, as usual, is predictable. All those little shots you've taken in the past and what is gained? A little attention from me, that's all.
Once again you dish it but can’t take it.. talk about predictable lol
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
Then you should read more carefully. BTW, observation is not judging and the nonbeliever sure do seem to judge a lot themselves. The real issue here should be why are people leaving or posting less? The simple answer is we see the same groups and arguments on a daily basis. If people would step outside of their comfort zone and make it a point to converse with others beyond a click, this place would be better. But instead, we have daily battles between groups or assumed groups which have gotten us where?
Given an in depth response chooses to reply to one sentence...

I’m not sure if you are aiming this at me but I talk to plenty of people I don’t agree with cordially and sometimes even manage to find common ground with them, so again not sure you are paying as much attention as you claim to be. But you do sure seem to like stirring the pot lately for reasons unbeknownst to me.. if you don’t like how the conversations are progressing you are under no obligation to participate. Or you know, you could start your own threads and see if they catch. I don’t understand the complaining though
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2018
Messages
1,367
And you said



Pretty sure my response was accurate.

You're the only one in this thread advocating killing anyone with the belief that God or anyone can't help them. It's essentially been you're only solution. You equate them to being sub human deserving of death because that is your solution.

I'm over myself. Your turn.
I never said we should kill “anyone”, I think the government ought to execute PEDOPHILES, specifically.

You seem to like to leave out that part.

And the reason I think PEDOPHILES should be put to death is because I LOVE the hundreds of innocent children they seek to r*pe & defile.

Pedophiles are child destroying predators.

Would you prefer to see hundreds of innocent children have their lives ruined ?

Are you really willing to measure the slim chance of “fixing” a child raping predator against the lives of hundreds of INNOCENT children that would become his victim??

I wouldn’t.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
I never said we should kill “anyone”, I think the government ought to execute PEDOPHILES, specifically.

You seem to like to leave out that part.

And the reason I think PEDOPHILES should be put to death is because I LOVE the hundreds of innocent children they seek to r*pe & defile.

Pedophiles are child destroying predators.

Would you prefer to see hundreds of innocent children have their lives ruined ?

Are you really willing to measure the slim chance of “fixing” a child raping predator against the lives of hundreds of INNOCENT children that would become his victim??

I wouldn’t.
What’s wrong with chemical castration?
 

Damien50

Star
Joined
Apr 22, 2017
Messages
1,788
I never said we should kill “anyone”, I think the government ought to execute PEDOPHILES, specifically.

You seem to like to leave out that part.

And the reason I think PEDOPHILES should be put to death is because I LOVE the hundreds of innocent children they seek to r*pe & defile.

Pedophiles are child destroying predators.

Would you prefer to see hundreds of innocent children have their lives ruined ?

Are you really willing to measure the slim chance of “fixing” a child raping predator against the lives of hundreds of INNOCENT children that would become his victim??

I wouldn’t.
I didn't leave it, I quoted it specifically but I did mention how that could create a slippery slope.

We already waste tons of fiat on minority non violent drug offenders, why not round up the known pedophiles and try treating them? What do you have to lose, more tax dollars?

You just jump ahead to killing them and while I find the abuse of children abhorrent, far too often we don't try to find out why but let public opinion and feelings take hold leading to conclusions like yours.

Last year two men came out against Afrikaans Bambata accusing him of molesting them when they were children, one of the men admitted to having p***phile like thoughts after his trauma and chose to isolate himself and push others away through violence because these weren't feelings he wanted to act on. He eventually got married and remains repulsed by sex and his trauma. He could very well be a p***phile or a very traumatized individual but I don't think the only help presented to him should be death for a trauma he didn't elect to have placed upon him.

There have been murderers, rapist, thieves, etc that have been reformed and dealt with their demons and while there takes an amount of trust for these people to be released they don't all go back to prison. I think second chances are deserved and if we're going to put that decision in the hands of the government some trust is required.
 

Deadlylady

Established
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
399
I didn't leave it, I quoted it specifically but I did mention how that could create a slippery slope.

We already waste tons of fiat on minority non violent drug offenders, why not round up the known pedophiles and try treating them? What do you have to lose, more tax dollars?

You just jump ahead to killing them and while I find the abuse of children abhorrent, far too often we don't try to find out why but let public opinion and feelings take hold leading to conclusions like yours.

Last year two men came out against Afrikaans Bambata accusing him of molesting them when they were children, one of the men admitted to having p***phile like thoughts after his trauma and chose to isolate himself and push others away through violence because these weren't feelings he wanted to act on. He eventually got married and remains repulsed by sex and his trauma. He could very well be a p***phile or a very traumatized individual but I don't think the only help presented to him should be death for a trauma he didn't elect to have placed upon him.

There have been murderers, rapist, thieves, etc that have been reformed and dealt with their demons and while there takes an amount of trust for these people to be released they don't all go back to prison. I think second chances are deserved and if we're going to put that decision in the hands of the government some trust is required.
I guess you don't have kids. If anything like that happened to your kids, you would be fine that they get help instead of being killed etc?
 

Damien50

Star
Joined
Apr 22, 2017
Messages
1,788
I guess you don't have kids. If anything like that happened to your kids, you would be fine that they get help instead of being killed etc?
Both parties are going to need help. I'm not saying don't kill them but that can't be the only solution. I understand wanting to be the avenger but vengeance doesn't belong to me and a lot worse people have been allowed to live that committed crimes that have spanned generations and caused generational trauma in the name of greed, supremacy, etc.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
Now... they go to prison and get NO HELP. They serve very little time, way less then they should. And get little to no treatment depending on where they are located. They get out and usually have to register but even that is a joke.

There are so many avenues we could try to actually help this which aren’t “kill them all” I don’t understand the jump straight there. I don’t.
 

Deadlylady

Established
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
399
Now... they go to prison and get NO HELP. They serve very little time, way less then they should. And get little to no treatment depending on where they are located. They get out and usually have to register but even that is a joke.

There are so many avenues we could try to actually help this which aren’t “kill them all” I don’t understand the jump straight there. I don’t.
I don't understand you point of view because kids are too precious to take that risk. And nobody will kill them anyways. Because its against "human rights". In this day and age all rapist, murderer etc are protected. I guess they have more rights than children and women.
 

justjess

Superstar
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
11,510
We could and should mandate lifelong chemical castration. And treatment. That’s my point of view and it’s a whole hell of a lot more than we do now.

I know a guy who got 8MONTHS for forcing a five year old to give him felatio. Was released back to his 1 and 3 year old daughters unsupervised. That is unacceptable and that is where we need to start.
 

Deadlylady

Established
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
399
We could and should mandate lifelong chemical castration. And treatment. That’s my point of view and it’s a whole hell of a lot more than we do now.

I know a guy who got 8MONTHS for forcing a five year old to give him felatio. Was released back to his 1 and 3 year old daughters unsupervised. That is unacceptable and that is where we need to start.
At this point anything is better than nothing. Castration should be permanent and not temporary. They should live the consequences for once.
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2018
Messages
1,367
Only 95%? With your homophobic attititude it really should be 100% surely?
I don’t think you paid attention: I give EVERYONE the Gospel with LOVE, hoping they will believe & be saved.

I do not rant about what they do in their personal lives or lecture them on their sexual choices. I don’t even ask that kind of stuff, but they always volunteer that info & I nod and continue my Gospel presentation. The goal is to get them saved.

Yes, 95% (approximately) get furious from me just asking them if I can show them from the Bible how to be saved.

It isn’t even about me....it’s the message they hate. It is God they hate.

But like I said, I don’t avoid giving homos or drag queens the Gospel, and I treat them just like anyone else when I witness to them.

It really makes no sense for you to keep referring to me as “homophobic”, because I am not afraid of homos.

Would you appreciate it if I repeatedly called you cynophobic just because you happen to be a cat person but you were not truly afraid of dogs?

It is nonsensical.
 
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
1,269
Dude, the Christians here argue with each other and I see the opposite of you, some on the fringe come here with statistically unusual Christian beliefs and they seem to stir the pot while demanding acceptance (some are posers). The bottom line is people can believe what they want but it is those with the oddest beliefs which are the loudest in the forum or ones who protest the most. So while you may claim to be a Christian, you sound no more like one taking shots at your own faith than did the poster you put into a similar small box. It is the first time I have seen you claim to be Christian, so sorry for not knowing. Lastly, no one phase of scripture like Love thy neighbor as yourself can represent an encompassing situation or discussion. Who are these American evans that overrun the place? It is okay to list them. All I see is people constantly splitting.
I don't often mention my faith for two reasons. 1.) Ultimately, it's between myself and God and I don't feel my personal beliefs are anyone else's concern, and 2.) the influence of Catholicism on my faith is likely to just get claims of heresy thrown at me anyway, so it's pointless.

But when you're calling homosexuals a derogatory slur, you deserve to be called out, especially if you get up high on that horse because you're not embracing the Christian charity Christ calls us to live. Especially because actions like Claire's are the reason Christianity is looked down upon.
 
Top