Well I would have to say that I agree with almost everything you are saying here except to make Leftism a wholly white thing. I agree strongly that there are plenty of White Liberals who are pushing garbage to minorities, essentially enslaving them to the State in hopes of selling them their victim hood for votes. However there are PLENTY of Minorities who are completely and totally diluted by these philosophies and therefore push this upon their own Race.
You as a Black Man stating the things you have on this thread, are a tiny minority of Black People, who by and large 100% sell out to Leftism and the Democratic Platform. In fact for the most part if you were to stand up on a street corner as a Black Man and start speaking about how utterly Racist, and Godless the Left is and in any way Champion for a Conservative ideology, there is an extremely high chance that you would be shouted down and called all sorts of terrible things, like Uncle Tom and the like by your own Race.
Candace Owens is a perfect example of this, she is someone who left Leftism and became an outspoken Black Women for the Conservatives and she is constantly harassed, called an Uncle Tom, a sell out, and all sorts of other horrible things, simply for not bowing down to the Leftists Agendas. Pretty sure we will have someone chime in here and say she was bought off or some other nonsense to denounce her simply because she rejected being associated with Leftist ideologies.
I also agree that Leftism is the party that is Godless, personally I dont understand how anyone can align themselves with the Leftist worldview and still consider themselves a Christian or a Muslim. The basics of these Religions are wholly Anti-Left, especially in the Moral Arena. I would agree with you in what you said when you were speaking of how one can claim to be affiliated with some sort of Religion but they clearly can not believe what the texts of these Religions state and still support Leftist ideologies.
When it comes to Economic Policies I also can not comprehend the Leftists positions, they continually make these Faux Arguments that they are against the Government, however they are completely and totally pushing for a Economic System that increases the Governments size and scope and invades into all individuals personal freedom. Leftism essentially states that your individual freedom is beneath the collectives needs, and when I say collectives needs, what that really means is the STATES control. That to me is just insanity.
I want the least amount of Government interference in my life period. Less taxes (in fact I believe the IRS and FED need to be abolished, taxation is theft) less regulations on the Free Market ( Capitalism is the only system that has pulled people by the literal billions out of Poverty. As opposed to Socialism/Communism which has only thrown billions into Poverty), less restriction on movement ect ect ect. The Government is here to protect the Freedoms given by God to me, to defend the Country if war comes, and ensure the Nation remains Sovereign, aka its own Country that looks after the best interest of its citizens as opposed to the World or other Nations.
I can not believe we are on a site that is all about the NWO ect and we still have people pushing Anti-Religion, and Socialism/Communism when that is literally the agenda of the NWO. They want a Communist State, that is Pro-Lucifer, which is literally the opposite of a Capitalist Sovereign Nation where the individual overpowers the Collective and values God and Morality...
People are brainwashed and the Left is doing great in moving everyone, especially the younger generation right towards the Agendas of the NWO...
I want to follow up on two things.
Thomas Sowell and theocracy.
I like The International Jew more than Thomas Sowell.
I've never seen Thomas Sowell even mention Zionism, much less go into the territory The International Jew went. That book predicted the future- in many, many ways. The rise of the domination of technology, for example.
As far as theocracy
this is from theocracy's wikipedia article:
"China
Further information: Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors and Chinese emperor
Similar to the Roman Emperor, the Chinese sovereign was historically held to be the Son of Heaven. However, from the first historical Emperor on, this was largely ceremonial and tradition quickly established it as a posthumous dignity, like the Roman institution. The situation before Qin Shi Huang Di is less clear.
The Shang dynasty essentially functioned as a theocracy, declaring the ruling family the sons of heaven and calling the chief sky god Shangdi after a word for their deceased ancestors."
How is that a nightmare? The emperor proclaims himself to be the son of heaven, the embodiment of divine authority?
How is that any different than George Bush claiming he talked to God?
The president is a role model. There was a Dominican dictator named Trujillo. He had a ton of medals and little kids would stick bits on tin (or some material like that) on their chest in imitation of him.
The president is like a celebrity (although their position is more serious).
Whether we like it or not, people imitate such people. People are influenced by such people.
The leader of a nation
should mention God. All the heads of state have to bow to God as even is written in the Bible. The Bible says that.
Whether you consider the Quran or the Bible the highest authority, the "Enlightenment" is not in the same category.
The Republicans believe in the "Enlightenment". I do not care about the "Enlightenment".
I have an excellent book by Ann Coulter called Demonic. I really love how she criticizes the French Revolution in the book and teaches her readers about the French Revolution.
And of course I'm with her on the French Revolution. However, Ann Coulter praises the US revolution. Even when I first learned about George Washington, I didn't agree.
You know and I know that the Freemasons were behind the US revolution. And I figure you know they were behind the "Enlightenment".
If you look at all the Satanic stuff going on in society- the "Enlightenment" served to prepare the way for a lot of it. It paved the way for society's institutions to be turned Satanic.
If you want the society to be turned Satanic, implement liberalism and "Enlightenment" principles.
When we follow principles from the "Enlightenment," it's like listening to a talking snake.