We know the exact deal that Manafort worked out, and none of it has to do with Trump.You have no idea what those cooperation deals have or have not vested out yet. Manafort case had nothing to do with trump, the cooperation agreement he struck for reduced jail time though is a different story since he specifically has to cooperate with the collusion investigation and it wouldn’t have been offered if he had nothing relevant.
You won’t know what mueller has until he has an ironclad case. Again, see previous racqueteering investigations.
And what of trumps lawyer implicating him directly in felonies under oath? Completely separate but not exactly nothing.
Wanna trade citizenship? I don’t like Trudeau but I dislike him a lot less than the monster that runs my country, and you’re higher than me 5 years ago in a cheap motel on Trump so it’s a win win.
Did you miss section 8? What else would mueller value cooperation with? There’s no reason to offer a plea to someone already found guilty and when your winning unless they can offer you something valuable.
I just posted a link. Manafort know lots of people, including Tony Podesta and Greg Craig, former White House counsel to Obama. Both Podesta's and Craig's law firms are being investigated right now. If Mueller doesn't come up with something on Trump, he may satisfy the mob's bloodlust by going after some juicy Democrat targets, and they are much, much dirtier than Trump is alleged to be.Ok I will ask again... what other kind of cooperation could Manafort have offered that would have enticed mueller to give a plea deal when Manafort was already convicted and headed to a lengthy prison term and 99% likely to lose on his remaining charges as well?
I guess we will see, soon enough.I just posted a link. Manafort know lots of people, including Tony Podesta and Greg Craig, former White House counsel to Obama. Both Podesta's and Craig's law firms are being investigated right now. If Mueller doesn't come up with something on Trump, he may satisfy the mob's bloodlust by going after some juicy Democrat targets, and they are much, much dirtier than Trump is alleged to be.
I meant to respond to this and forgot to. The alleged felony is a campaign finance violation. The amount of the alleged violation is less than the amount Obama was fined a few years ago for doing the exact same thing. It's not nothing, but it's about as close to it as you can be.And what of trumps lawyer implicating him directly in felonies under oath? Completely separate but not exactly nothing.
It isn’t nearly the same as the Obama case, it’s a candidate using campaign funds to cover up an affair to influence the election.I meant to respond to this and forgot to. The alleged felony is a campaign finance violation. The amount of the violation is less than the amount Obama was fined a few years ago for doing the exact same thing. It's not nothing, but it's about as close to it as you can be.
There are people who have always said that Mueller has been working for Trump this whole time, and that this has been cover for an investigation of people tied to the Democratic machine. I never bought it, but I am now having second thoughts.I guess we will see, soon enough.
Still, it's not considered a big deal.It isn’t nearly the same as the Obama case, it’s a candidate using campaign funds to cover up an affair to influence the election.
Hey you could be right, I’ve always said Trump’s election was a coup, and if Mueller targets a bunch of Democrats prior to the elections it will be more proof that the elite wanted Him all along.There are people who have always said that Mueller has been working for Trump this whole time, and that this has been cover for an investigation of people tied to the Democratic machine. I never bought it, but I am now having second thoughts.
Look at it this way: We have no evidence of Russian collusion, but we are now sure that the Department of Justice was working against Trump even before his election, in conjunction with the Obama White House and the Clintons. That's a fact. And Trump hasn't said anything against Manafort, like he did with Cohen. He appears to have no problem at all with Manafort's deal.
And there's this:
Nunes: Democrats, Journalists Will Be ‘Frightened’ By Declassified Trump-Russia Documents
It looks like all classified material relating to the investigation will be made public right before the midterms. This will include documentation that supported the FISA warrants that were used to spy on Trump. It's a certain thing that this will make people in the Democratic party look very bad, as the "evidence" that was used to justify the warrants was solely the so-called Steele dossier. The Steele dossier was cooked up by a British spy, using Russian sources, all paid for by the FBI and the DNC. Talk about colluding with foreigners to influence the election.
Could it possibly have anything to do with all the illegal things they've been doing?Hey you could be right, I’ve always said Trump’s election was a coup, and if Mueller targets a bunch of Democrats prior to the elections it will be more proof that the elite wanted Him all along.
It could. Corporate Democrats are and always will be corrupt, it wouldn’t be hard for a soon to be dictator like Trump to use legitimate grievances against his enemies to seize absolute power.Could it possibly have anything to do with all the illegal things they've been doing?
The narrative is that Trump, with no evidence, is to be considered guilty and the Mueller commission totally justified, but if the Democrats actually do something wrong and are investigated for it, it's a conspiracy.Could it possibly have anything to do with all the illegal things they've been doing?
The narrative is that Trump, with no evidence, is to be considered guilty and the Mueller commission totally justified, but if the Democrats actually do something wrong and are investigated for it, it's a conspiracy.
See why more and more people are taking criticism of Trump less and less seriously?