1) the story of Jacob wrestling with the man. Is said to be an angel. Google it
the name Israel as "wrestles with God" is misunderstood as it doesn't mean he fights with God (for God sake who would believe such an absurd thing) but that he struggles for God's cause. Kind of like the meaning of jihad or crusade.
2) I really can't reply to each point since they require detailed replies
But Jesus is not God. The trinitarian doctrine is a false and literal understanding of mystical themes in the new testament that developed.
John 1:1 made two seemingly contradictory statements
The Word was with God
And
The Word is God
These two statements are both correct because one refers to God's Trancendence and the other to God's Immanence.
I can fully believe that God is Immanent in the Word/Son but this is not His Trancendence.
3) just to illustrate the extent of your ignorance
The Catholic church was the one who St Augustine mentioned and followed with the trinitarian doctrine.
So even this doctrine is from Rome.
So you believe the Catholic church to be evil and pagan? Good...and so is your belief that came from it.
But I don't even know what point you are making. The whore of Babylon is actually the Jewish nation and the proof is in Jeremiah 2-3, Zechariah 5 and even Jesus said 'jerusalem Jerusalem you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you"
Again this is a topic o have dedicated a lot of time talking about on this forum
So each time a new Christian comes out from under a rock to make these arguments I really don't need to respond each time.e
It shows the extent of ignorance you faux Christians are living in to be wrong on everything all the time.
Sorry, this is wrong ^^^
Jacob did indeed wrestle with God Himself...likely the "angel of The LORD" mentioned throughout the OT (which most Biblical scholars agree is another name for Christ....and no, not Dave from Skipton). IsraEL
does mean "wrestles with God", and it means it literally. In the Bible we always take the text at literal translation, unless it's an obvious allegory or parable. No other meaning need be ascribed.
Who would believe such an absurd thing? Well, I for one. Mankind has "fought" with God since the minute Adam &Eve decided to become their own gods and disobeyed the only "Do Not" commandment God gave them when they took from the Tree of Knowledge and ate from it. I "fight" with God all the time: when He wants me to forgive and I don't feel it; or He wants me to give more of my time, talent or treasure than my selfish nature wants to; or He wants me to put Him on the throne of my life rather than myself....etc etc. Jacob just happened to PHYSICALLY wrestle with God. And if you know anything about Jacob's life as a stubborn, self-serving trickster, it's not surprising that was what it took for him to finally
submit to God and the plan He had for Jacob. While Jacob always had a true belief in Jehovah, up until that little wrestling match Jacob's OWN agenda was top priority, so actually NOTHING like the meaning of a crusader. Pre-Israel Jacob was certainly not struggling FOR God, but rather against Him. So, God got his attention in a rather unique way.
Ironically, the quote from John 1:1 is one of the strongest proofs in the Bible that explicitly confirms Jesus was God Himself, eternal and pre-incarnate, who became human to perfectly and sinlessly fulfill the law and lay his life down as the only acceptable atonement. You have just misinterpreted it:
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
(Just substitute the name Jesus for "Word", and it makes total sense: In the beginning was Jesus, and Jesus was with God, and Jesus was God.)
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
(This speaks to Jesus' participation in all creation - see also Genesis 1:26 "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness")
Continued:
14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
(This could refer to no one else but Christ, who was indeed flesh and dwelt among us. It refers not to a "concept" but to a PERSON - note the use of the personal pronoun "his". Like, that's pretty explicit - how can you interpret it any other way???)
So, actually not contradictory at all.
You keep speaking of God's transcendence and His immanence as reasons to reject the Trinity. Not sure why?? In the simplest description, God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit have always existed eternally as one. In God's amazing and mysterious plan, He knew that His precious children were going to rebel against Him and bring upon themselves eternal separation from Him. But He devised the perfect solution: He Himself (in the form of the Son) would be born into humanity and take their just punishment in their place. While Jesus was here on earth and limited in His humanity to being in one place at one time, the Father remained in his transcendent state, continuing to operate in His usual omnipresent, omnipotent, and all-knowing attributes. That's why you see Jesus always submitting to the Father during his earthly ministry...he was here to "do the will of the Father".
The Godhead Jesus left Heaven and came to earth in the form of a man for roughly 33 yrs to teach us what unconditional love, grace, and mercy look like clothed in human flesh and to mop up our sin mess once and for all....while the Godhead Father remained in Heaven effectively tending the shop and running the Universe.
LASTLY: if we're all "faux Christians", then what is a REAL Christian??? I'm honestly dying to know!