I didn't change a thing.
I used the same source you did, and cited Gill's Exposition on the verse (which is linked,), as well as the interlinear.
This is from the commentary below Isaiah 6:1...
We cannot determine from the phrase used whether the vision was seen before or after Uzziah's death. I saw also; rather, then it was that I saw (comp. Exodus 16:6). The Lord. Not "Jehovah," as in vers. 3 and 5, but "Adonay," for greater reverence. Sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up. The imagery is, of course, taken from the practice of earthly kings...
It does seem to say the opposite.. but the speaker should be taken into consideration, of course.
I don't know if you understood what I said earlier so I might just be wasting my time with this but again let me explain.
THE LORD=ADONAI=GOD
When it says Yahweh then Jews don't say the name of God instead they replace that with Adonai typically.
That doesn't mean the word Adonai is not used on it's own merit.
In either of these cases Adonai refers to GOD.
In the case of Psalm 110, the word used for the messiah was 'adoni'. So it is translated or read as ADONAI (ie God) says to Adoni (my lord) 'sit at my right hand' etc.
in the same link
http://biblehub.com/psalms/110-1.htm
My Lord.--Heb., adoni, an address of honour to those more noble than the speaker, or superior in rank: to a father, Genesis 31:35; to a brother, Numbers 12:11; a royal consort, 1Kings 1:17-18; to a prince, 1Kings 3:17; with addition of the royal title, "my Lord, O king," 2Samuel 14:19.
My argument is that Jesus referred to Psalm 110 as proof of his title ie 'lord' ie ADONI (as above). Therefore it is theologically dishonest for christians to later alter words and letters so that 'lord' becomes THE LORD as if to imply he is God. Even if you do believe this due to other aspects of your belief, the term 'lord' should always be without capitals as it was in Psalm 110 ie 'my lord'.
But it also serves as another evidence that Jesus as adoni is not Adonai. christians have often said that Jesus was a servant in the flesh and God in spirit for example and even this is a contradition of the claim that Jesus was fully God in the flesh.
I know this stuff is difficult for you guys to take but none of this is based on islam btw. I'm perfectly capable of understanding the NT on it's own merit without the use of islamic scripture.
No matter how 'hard' you remain on this issue just remember my version of truth is better rounded and it is based on understanding not a single other christian out there has given you. No i am not saying this out of a bloated sense of importance. It is just my understanding.
John 1:1 as i said many many many times was a balance of the Logical truth AND the mystical truth
The WORD WAS WITH God
The WORD IS God
If you could understand how God is both Trancendent and Immanent then you could understand this.
Then you could think of God's Immanence and you could directly experience His presence all around you. Then you could ask yourself 'is God in the air, in the wall, sky, floor?' etc. The logical answer to that is obviously no. YET the mystical reality is yes He is.
Rather than see a contradiction you can easily see how both are true from different perspectives..and that is in accordance with the way our brain is divided ie left and right hemisphere.
Once you have grasped this you could appreciate that the jewish nation in the time of Jesus was spiritually lost (due to the many false shepherds in that time) and hence they were lacking the mystical/spiritual aspect of religion and hence lacking God in their hearts. Hence 'uncircumcised in their heart'.
So Jesus came and made mystical statements in order to challenge thier perception. Many understood but many failed. Those who were failed were the extreme logical minded literalist types ie the sadducee sect.
So christianity was perfect in it's time and balanced.
it is only later ie in the roman era of christianity that this spiritual/mystical presence was lost and they got bogged down into theological disagreements and each time they added to the original belief until you had the trinitatrian doctrine laid out in literal terms.
YET i have also shared info on this forum pertaining to the IMMANENCE of the Trinity so ironically the doctrine deep down affirms the truth YET the christians are unwilling to accept that but instead demand that Jesus is literally, logically fully God and do not treat it as a mystical statement referring to the Immanence of God.
Also as above, if most christians on here are protestant and reject catholicism, then why are they so keen to believe in the trinity when that is also from the same culture ie rome? I have also devled deeper on this topic by highlighting the absurd practices existing in the time of King Henry the 8th and the Tudor era in general alongside Martin Luther.
Finally just try to understand the point i'm making. Jesus was the Logos/Word made flesh, i have no issue with that. HOWEVER the Logos is the underlying principle holding the entire universe/all things in creation together ie it is in everything. Think about how vast the physical universe is and how it's existed for 14billion years. IF the logos is indeed 'fully God' in the most literal sense, then by extention the entire universe is, since the universe is the Word in manifestation which preceded the Word made flesh ie Jesus the messiah.
For from him and through him and for him are all things.
I have also from time to time talked about Philo, the jewish philosopher who first introduced the Logos to Jewish thought.
Therefore the ideas pertaining to logos should be explored ie.
Stoic philosophy began with Zeno of Citium c. 300 BC, in which the logos was the active reason pervading and animating the Universe
think this one through.
They called the logos providence, nature, god, and the soul of the universe, which is composed of many seminal logoi that are contained in the universal logos.
Philo of Alexandria, a 1st-century-ad Jewish philosopher, taught that the logos was the intermediary between God and the cosmos, being both the agent of creation and the agent through which the human mind can apprehend and comprehend God.
next time you think of 'The Word/Logos/son' will you think only of Jesus or will you consider the living presence of the Logos everywhere and inside you? ie the macrocosm and microcosm and then consider the fact that the Father reveals Himself through the Logos hence God is Immanent everywhere and inside you too.
How could being aware of this, change you?
Matthew 6
For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. 22The eye is the lamp of the body. If your vision is clear, your whole body will be full of light. 23But if your vision is poor, your whole body will be full of darkness.
Luke 11:35
Be careful, then, that the light within you is not darkness.